Non-Parallellism in TL-191

Status
Not open for further replies.
This rarely gets mentioned :

Featherston's Over Open Sights gets published only after his ascent to power and isn't as pervasive among his own supporters as OTL's Mein Kampf. Maybe it's because it would be less believable to copy OTL, since Featherston's homeland shares the same language with its arch enemy. And unlike a certain choleric Austrian painter, Featherston is pretty much self-taught and not from a very wealthy background.
 
Honestly, just because of the last name. I figure more Russians came to the US than OTL, and this guy was one of them, and ended up in a very different role.

Seems like a bit too much heavy thinking. Not to mention the fact that they're vastly different ages.

This rarely gets mentioned :

Featherston's Over Open Sights gets published only after his ascent to power and isn't as pervasive among his own supporters as OTL's Mein Kampf. Maybe it's because it would be less believable to copy OTL, since Featherston's homeland shares the same language with its arch enemy. And unlike a certain choleric Austrian painter, Featherston is pretty much self-taught and not from a very wealthy background.

Which certain Austrian painter came from a very wealthy background? Certainly not the son of a civil servant of the empire who had been born into a peasant family and died a failed farmer?
 
Well from the snippets he reads out loud Over Open Sights was more a thinly-disguised rant towards blacks rather then a call for revenge and fascism.
 
Well from the snippets he reads out loud Over Open Sights was more a thinly-disguised rant towards blacks rather then a call for revenge and fascism.

He also rails massively against the Confederate Establishment, almost all of the vitriol being aimed at the War Department.
 
Well from the snippets he reads out loud Over Open Sights was more a thinly-disguised rant towards blacks rather then a call for revenge and fascism.

Given that most of the speeches he gave were obviously anti-black rants I don't see why he would choose to thinly disguise it in his book.
 
Last edited:
Featherston is not a Hitler-copy, just another dictator that did a infamous industrial genocide. His rise is significantly different.

His rage, unlike Hitler's shouts, was cold and deadly.
 
Well Over Open Sights read like it was scoffed at but you had to buy the thing. The poorer people liked it as it sounded like them.
 
Featherston actually cared for the rights of soldiers while Hitler only liked them as canon fodder and refused to meet with wounded soldiers. Also, while Featherston was opposed by the Confederate aristocracy who he hated as well, Hitler received heavy financial support from the German elite and partial support or at least neutrality from much of the German aristocracy. Wilhelm II eldest son the crown prince and one of Wilhelm's other sons August Wilhelm both supported the Nazis for a while.
 
Featherston hung out at the front line and fired personal weapons at the enemy. As far as I know, Hitler occasionally went near the front in an armored train, but usually kept his participation in the war to his various fuehrer-headquarters.
 
Also, Featherston's rank while he was in the Army was Sergenat, while Hitler only got promoted to Corporal.

Technically, Hitler was a gefreiter, which is something like a senior private.

Another Featherston-Hitler compare-and-contrast -- Featherston was a professional soldier who joined the military in peacetime and was part pf a prestigious regular army unit, whereas Hitler was a wartime volunteer who was placed in a reserve division created well after the war had started.
 
Technically, Hitler was a gefreiter, which is something like a senior private.

Another Featherston-Hitler compare-and-contrast -- Featherston was a professional soldier who joined the military in peacetime and was part pf a prestigious regular army unit, whereas Hitler was a wartime volunteer who was placed in a reserve division created well after the war had started.

Did Featherston won any nedals? If so, then what was it and if not, then I guess Hitler may have an edge over his ATL counterpart in terms of military life.
 
Did Featherston won any nedals? If so, then what was it and if not, then I guess Hitler may have an edge over his ATL counterpart in terms of military life.

Nobody's going to give the man who indirectly contributed to the death of Jeb Stuart's grandson any medal.

And Hitler certainly did have it better, getting to fight his war at regimental HQ while Featherston could see his enemies over open sights.
 
The Leader

Reaching out to the masses

Hitler: hated using the radio (didn't even start using it until after he became chancellor), preferred using theatrical oratory in front of a live audience; gradually drifted out of public view as the war went on and used his propaganda chief as his mouthpiece.

Featherston: starts out using live oratory; starts using radio later in his career but was equally comfortable using audiences late into the war; never abandoned personally doing broadcasts and public appearances even in the last year of the war.

Work ethic

Hitler: absolutely hated desk work; had a lazy sleep/work schedule revolving around things he was interested in, including watching movies and having long mealtimes.

Featherston disliked desk work but did it anyway out of sense of duty and power-keeping; often slept and ate as an afterthought.

Personality

Hitler: disliked people who talked just as much as he did; couldn't stand people who told the truth as they saw it and not as he did; was a screamer; was a vegetarian who hated smoking and drank very rarely.

Featherston: liked yes-men but also appreciated subordinates who wouldn't bullshit him; enjoyed his red-meat, Cubans and whiskey and in his younger days would get shit-faced; rarely screamed.

Between this, and all the other Hitler/Featherston comparisons that've just been listed, I just have to comment: isn't it funny how the fictional genocidal racist dictator was, at the end of the day, more respectable and humanistic (at least, as far as genocidal racist dictators can be; you know what I mean); while his real-life counterpart was the more miserable, impossible-to-be-around, uptight irredeemable waste of a human life who more closely resembled a pure evil, one-dimensional comic book-style villain? Truth is stranger than fiction.
 
Featherston hung out at the front line and fired personal weapons at the enemy. As far as I know, Hitler occasionally went near the front in an armored train, but usually kept his participation in the war to his various fuehrer-headquarters.

Not to mention that Hitler never actually saw the Front and tended to leave the war in his hands when he was too far to adequately lead but too distrusting of his own generals to let them do their thing. Featherston by contrast trusted his generals rather more and as a result they seem on the whole to have trusted him more, also. Featherston also recognized that PTSD existed, the Nazi regime of OTL did not, and treated it as cowardice and worthy of being shot (which the USSR also did).
 
Technically, Hitler was a gefreiter, which is something like a senior private.

Another Featherston-Hitler compare-and-contrast -- Featherston was a professional soldier who joined the military in peacetime and was part pf a prestigious regular army unit, whereas Hitler was a wartime volunteer who was placed in a reserve division created well after the war had started.

An even more obvious one-Featherston was a CS citizen descended from someone attached to a lower rung of the traditional structure, but still traditional. Hitler was an illegal immigrant who served in the Bavarian Army for dislike of the regime he grew up in and due to his Pan-Germanic ideology and did not become a German citizen until the 1930s.
 
Between this, and all the other Hitler/Featherston comparisons that've just been listed, I just have to comment: isn't it funny how the fictional genocidal racist dictator was, at the end of the day, more respectable and humanistic (at least, as far as genocidal racist dictators can be; you know what I mean); while his real-life counterpart was the more miserable, impossible-to-be-around, uptight irredeemable waste of a human life who more closely resembled a pure evil, one-dimensional comic book-style villain? Truth is stranger than fiction.

Yeah. I really can't picture Hitler patching up a soldier's wound in the middle of a battlefield.
 
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Between this, and all the other Hitler/Featherston comparisons that've just been listed, I just have to comment: isn't it funny how the fictional genocidal racist dictator was, at the end of the day, more respectable and humanistic (at least, as far as genocidal racist dictators can be; you know what I mean); while his real-life counterpart was the more miserable, impossible-to-be-around, uptight irredeemable waste of a human life who more closely resembled a pure evil, one-dimensional comic book-style villain? Truth is stranger than fiction.

OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So true. . .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top