That depends on your definition of African, and I certainly wouldn't call myself an African.
You suggested that apologists for imperialism should die, after suggesting I was one such apologist, and then complained about my less than flattering characterisation of you.
The thrust of your argument is that somehow in this magical fairyland uncolonised Africa that the African tribes were just on the cusp of a major vaccination programme when Livingstone got lost and thus that in the Naughties, Tens, and Twenties there would have been a comparable scheme of mass vaccination (accompanied by a mass building of Western hospitals), which would have produced a similar explosion of the African population.
I'm pointing out that that is a fantasy and therefore that the African population would be much lower.
Wait, when did I say this? That's a pretty big claim. I just wish people would stop apologizing for the mass murder, land theft and brutality that is Empire (regardless of who does it).
Population growth did not require European overseers to happen.
'In the century between 1900 and 2000, Thailand went from a country with around
10,000,000 citizens to having over 60 million people living there.'
'Ethiopia (Abyssinia in 1900) grew from an estimated 4 million people in 1900 to
90 million today, a growth of 22.5 times and the largest one we could find'
You'll note, neither of those nations were colonized.