Nobunaga’s Ambition Realized: Dawn of a New Rising Sun

That is true considering how the southern regions' maritime focus are something the government of Japan ittl are focused on too, and their influence alongside Kansai would be the main cultural heart of Japan ittl. Kanto's dialects would be seen as backwards and the 'stereotypical farmer's accent', and I see them being the main 'counter culture' of Japan. They'd probably be conservatives and practice shinto and buddhism.
It's still not stopping other major Western clans like the Mōri from using the restoration of imperial powers as a pretext to overthrow the Oda chancellery though.

That said, the Shimazu domain is scary fat, that - in fact - it can lend a credible amount of resources for an internal power struggle and even outright conflict with the chancellery government. In this case, it's going to be a conflict to take over or seize the government or the domains and organs in question as opposed to overthrowing it, however, which - I speculate - can happen way earlier before someone actually conceptualises the return of the power to the empero-

Oh, wait. The emperor can also call the Sangi-shu himself! That's one step that can make the entire process way faster (and hopefully more peaceful) than it could have been, since he already has a legitimate forum to promulgate his potential edict to confiscate a part or even the entirety of the Oda domains! Talk about the confiscator becoming the confiscated!

That said - while the Chancellery may already have transcended the Oda clan itself as the latter increasingly breaks into cadet branches and wanes vis-a-vis to the crystalising and formally clan-impartial central government - it's still a formidable power to confront though, especially when it's united and motivated against a well-defined enemy.
 
Last edited:
Oh, wait. The emperor can also call the Sangi-shu himself! That's one step that can make the entire process way faster (and hopefully more peaceful) than it could have been, since he already has a legitimate forum to promulgate his potential edict to confiscate a part or even the entirety of the Oda domains! Talk about the confiscator becoming the confiscated!

That said - while the Chancellery may already have transcended the Oda clan itself as the latter increasingly breaks into cadet branches and wanes vis-a-vis to the crystalising and formally clan-impartial central government - it's still a formidable power to confront though, especially when it's united and motivated against a well-defined enemy.
I'd think that even tho the Emperor (with a bunch of allies) could probably wrest power back to their own hands, the Nobunagas would be much harder to depose fully than the Tokugawas of otl because the Nobunagas' power comes from their control over the colonies just as much as it comes from the Kansai and the south. I think internal squabbles in the Nobunaga faction that leads to one subfaction allying with the Kanto nobles and giving the emperor more powers (and maaaybe a lower house if the ppl get lucky, it'd probably be for the merchants just as much tho) would be likely.
 
Yes, Chacha of OTL married Emperor Go-Yozei.
Yeah that's what I thought, thanks for that.

With that marriage being a thing, it should keep the Oda clan stay in power, at least for awhile longer than the Tokugawa OLT and with the Oda clan their allies mainly focusing on maritime trading and being more open with other nations, we probably won't see them being deposed for awhile until one of their envious rivals attempts to do something not smart like what happened with Furuwatari War.
 
Japanese Christianity is really undergoing important changes for its eventual divorce from the Roman Church, although I have to wonder when Japan may eventually start colonising the island of Karafuto, and considering it's not yet time for Russia to expand in that region, they might still have a chance of occupying the whole island.
 
Chapter 74: The Nguyen-Trinh War and the Siamese Intervention

Chapter 74: The Nguyen-Trinh War and the Siamese Intervention

Since the late 16th century, the nominally united Dai Viet kingdom was divided between the Trinh and Nguyen families in the north and south respectively. Their role in Vietnamese politics began when Nguyen Kim and Trinh Kiem backed Le Trang Tong against the Mac dynasty that had recently usurped the throne, starting a struggle between the Later Le and Mac dynasties that lasted for decades until the latter was driven to Cao Da province in the far north in 1592. The two bloodlines developed a rivalry over the course of the century as they began to be established in their respective regions. During this time, the Trinh family established themselves as the puppet masters of the Le rulers. The near-complete defeat of the Mac dynasty ended any sense of unity as Trinh Tung tightened his grip on court affairs, leading to Nguyen Hoang adopting the princely title of Vuong and effectively declaring independence from Hanoi in 1600. The Nguyen lords in the south also began friendly relations with European merchants, particularly the Portuguese, and were producing their own bronze cannons from 1615 onwards. Finally, Nguyen Phuc Nguyen refused to pay taxes to Hanoi in 1620 and after a demand by Trinh Trang to submit fell on deaf ears, conflict broke out in 1627.

The first years of the war saw a continuous stalemate, with the Nguyen defenses and their bounty of advanced gunpowder weaponry and Portuguese advisors unable to be broken by the more numerous Trinh forces. However, an ever-changing web of alliances would alter the situation. Siam, an external foe of the Nguyen lords, began closer relations with the Spanish and Portuguese amidst rising Spanish-Japanese tensions, loosening Portuguese commitments to the Nguyen lords. The resulting Iberian-Japanese War would permanently weaken Portuguese presence in Southeast Asia, further weakening Portuguese ties with the family. Furthermore, the Trinh lords would take advantage of inter-European rivalries and turn to the ascendant Dutch for military aid. These changing circumstances would reflect upon the Battle of the Gianh River in 1643 when a Trinh army of 10,000, armed with the latest European cannons and arquebuses, broke through the Nguyen-constructed fortifications with the help of 5 VOC warships led by Pieter Baeck [1]. Although the land forces initially couldn’t break through the second and final wall, a successful Dutch victory at sea against a fleet of Nguyen junks enabled the 222-strong crew to make an amphibious assault from behind, forcing the encircled Nguyen army to retreat. This victory was followed by a successful siege of the Nguyen capital in 1646, forcing Nguyen Phuc Lan to flee further south with his supporters and relatives. The struggle between the two sides would continue but it was clear that the Trinh family had the momentum.​

Gianh_River.jpg


Gianh River in the modern day​

It was at this low point when the Nguyen lords would swallow their pride and ask for assistance from a historical rival, Siam. By this time, Siam had taken advantage of the Viet infighting and once again made Cambodia its tributary while also defeating a Myanman attempt to wrest Lan Na from Siamese subjugation in 1637 [2]. Despite its success, however, the kingdom watched the Trinh momentum with alarm as a fully reunited Dai Viet under the rule of one family would no doubt pose a threat, particularly in retaining control over Cambodia and the Mekong Delta. Therefore, Prasat Thong was all too eager to intervene in the civil war and ensure the survival of a Nguyen-controlled south. At the capital of Ayutthaya, a large army was quickly gathered to be commanded in the field by the crown prince Chaofa Chai and his uncle Si Suthammaracha. They would be joined en route to southern Dai Viet by allied Cambodian troops. Combined, the Siamese intervention in the Trinh-Nguyen conflict involved 18,000 men.

With Siam jumping into the conflict, Trinh Trang knew he would have to muster a great army against the pro-Nguyen coalition. As the lord by now exceeded 70 years in age, he would have his son Trinh Tac lead any military campaign in the south. He himself would send his representatives into Cambodia and the lands of the Champa, hoping to trigger rebellion behind the backs of his enemy. The Trinh lord would also send an envoy to the VOC asking them for more assistance specifically against the Siamese. Before any of these other plans would come to fruition, however, the Trinh and Nguyen armies with their various allies would clash at Vijaya in 1649. The Nguyen-Siamese coalition army numbered 30,000 while the Trinh army numbered 25,000. Although the former held the numerical advantage, it was unbalanced in terms of skill. The Nguyen portion of the army, numbering around 12,000, had a disproportionate number of raw recruits due to heavy losses in the recent Trinh offensive while the Cambodians were the least well-equipped in terms of technological progress. By contrast, the Siamese had years of modernization and had many experienced men, most notably 2,000 samurai cavalry drawn from Kirishitan exiles and the retinue of the Honjo clan. The Nguyen forces formed the center while the Siamese composed the wings, the cavalry positioned on the right, and the Cambodian levies served as the reserves. Compared to their diverse foe, the Trinh army was relatively homogenous, equipped with many Dutch arquebuses and cannons with elephants in the middle of the army. Elephants were in the Trinh army as well, albeit more in the back.​

1685997562014.png


Red=Cambodian, Salmon=Siamese, Blue=Nguyen, Brown=Trinh​

Understanding that the soft spot of the coalition army was its center, Trinh Tac aimed his artillery inwards, disproportionately shelling the Nguyen center. This was followed by a charge from the center and almost immediately the Nguyen center began to be pushed back. The Siamese infantry on the left confronted the Trinh offensive only for the Trinh right to counter-charge, creating a stalemate. However, the cavalry-heavy left, fronted by the samurai cavalry contingent, was mopping up the Trinh left, only to be temporarily halted by the Trinh elephants. Nguyen artilleryfire, however, broke the elephants and they stampeded off the battlefield, throwing the Trinh ranks into disorder. Pressed on all sides, Trinh Tac ordered a retreat but not before suffering heavy losses. The battle ended in a clear Nguyen-Siamese victory with the Cambodian reserves not even having been deployed.

The victory at Vijaya completely changed the balance of power in Dai Viet, with the Nguyen lords backed by Siam beginning to recapture their lost lands. However, Trinh Trang’s machinations from afar began to kick in. 7 Dutch warships sailed near the bay of Ayutthaya and attempted a blockade, although the Siamese royal fleet were able to drive them out. Dutch ships would periodically harass the Siamese coastlines over the next few years without much material success while somewhat keeping the realm on their toes. The stirring within Cambodia aided by the activities of Trinh agents would prove to be a much more serious affair for the Siamese-Nguyen war effort. At the time, its ruler Ramathipadi I was controversially a Muslim in the Buddhist-majority kingdom, going by the name Ibrahim. This created much resentment among the populace and so were receptive to the Trinh-backed rebellion of Ang Non, a son of the late Outey and a Buddhist. The eruption of the rebellion and its initial success forced Siam to divert attention towards cracking down on Ang Non and his Trinh-backed supporters, halting the Nguyen reversal in southern Dai Viet. However, it wasn’t enough for Trinh forces to once again overwhelm enemy troops and Trinh Trang began to accept that a total victory was probably impossible. In 1652, after a quarter century of conflict, the Trinh and Nguyen lords finally agreed on peace, the latter recognizing the Le emperor in Hanoi once again while retaining autonomy through control of a reduced part of southern Dai Viet.

As for the Cambodian rebellion, Prasat Thong would resolve the situation by forcing Ibrahim off his throne, replacing him with Ang Non’s younger brother Ang So, crowned as Barom Reachea V of Cambodia in 1653. This reversed the momentum of Ang Non’s rebellion and it would conclude in 1655 with his death. Barom Reachea V’s new court in Oudong, unlike that of his predecessors, would see unprecedented levels of Siamese intrusion into Cambodian politics and encroachment upon the kingdom’s sovereignty. This fact, along with a weakened Nguyen realm, expanded Siamese political power in Indochina and increased the tripolarity of the region between them, the Myanma, and the Trinh lords.

[1]: The battle was a Nguyen victory IOTL.

[2]: Lan Na was never retaken by the Myanma in 1622.​
 
Last edited:
Hmm Vietnam being weaker than otl and the Thais being stronger would defo change things. Would we get a direct annexation of Cambodia into Siam?
 
The Ming must be worried, Japan, Korea, and Siam are all expanding.
On one hand I can see why the Ming would be concerned, but considering that the Ming were largely isolationist at this point, I think it would largely be left to circumstance whether the Chinese act or not.

Personally I'd like to see China go through a period of being split into multiple states due to a weak dynasty and foreign actors.
 
Last edited:
On one hand I can see why the Ming would be concerned, but considering that the Ming were largely isolationist at this point. I think it would largely be left to circumstance whether the Chinese act or not.

Personally I'd like to see China go through a period of being split into multiple states due to a weak dynasty and foreign actors.
The empire, long divided, must unite; long united, must divide. Thus it has ever been.

The Ming may have avoided the costly and expensive imjin war, but Japan is much stronger and wealthier because of it. The Ming have triumphed over the Jin but The Joseon and Yuan are growing stronger because of it. The empire may have opened itself to all trade in Macau but the western powers will profit and expand there destabilizing influence because of it. The Empire may have gotten some good emperors recently but the corruption that caused the Famines, plague, civil unrest, and court intrigue are still there and ready to bubble back up one a weaker emperor raised during the good times takes to the throne.
 
Last edited:
The Ming must be worried, Japan, Korea, and Siam are all expanding.
And they're not exactly as "barbaric" to boot, with two of them even being Confucian. Japan even had a completely sovereign huangdi counterpart in the form of its mikado, even if it's theoretical due to being definitively puppeted by the chancellor's government.
The Empire may have gotten some good emperors recently but the corruption that caused the Famines, plague, civil unrest, and court intrigue are still there and ready to bubble back up one a weaker emperors raised during the good times take to the throne.
I wonder if they will ever stop being so bloody-minded about the idea of dynastic change and other forms of power struggles.

The question now is: how far will Macau and its appointed mandarins will permit the budding western studies within the city and its surrounding environs go? That will satisfy a large part of the question whether the Ming court will finally adopt some crucial innovations like double-entry bookkeeping and fractional-reserve banking once and for all.
 
Last edited:
And they're not exactly as "barbaric" to boot,
I always assumed the the Qing pushed the Barbarian message harder then there predecessor to make themselfs look better
with two of them even being Confucian.
I know Korea is Confucian but what is the other one? Japan and the Yuan should be guided by a plethora of ideology’s and religions, and Siam is Buddhist.
Japan even had a completely sovereign huangdi counterpart in the form of its mikado, even if it's theoretical due to being definitively puppeted by the chancellor's government.
Actually The imperial household probably has more power under the Chancellors the they had under the shogunates, I have seen example’s of Imperial political actions that the tokugawa would never have allowed.
I wonder if they will ever stop being so bloody-minded about the idea of dynastic change and other forms of power struggles.
while Chinese civil wars can get interesting (bloody) all places have fights for power. I bet the Roman Empire would have preferred the mandate dynasty cycle that China had then the system they had
The question now is: how far will Macau and its appointed mandarins will permit the budding western studies within the city and its surrounding environs go? That will satisfy a large part of the question whether the Ming court will finally adopt some crucial innovations like double-entry bookkeeping and fractional-reserve banking once and for all.
Conservative Confucianists will probably push back hard.
 
Last edited:
I know Korea is Confucian but what is the other one? Japan and the Yuan should be guided by a plethora of ideology’s and religions, and Siam is Buddhist.
I had Japan in mind with this; well, they must still have concerned themselves with its ideas even if it's not the ideology itself of the state.
while Chinese civil wars can get interesting (bloody) all places have fights for power. I bet the Roman Empire would have preferred the mandate dynasty cycle that China had then the system they had
It's owing to their bureaucrats' ability to embezzle so much resources and purge their opponents with much more expedient schemes that their centralised imperial government enable them. The outsiders that lose out from that arrangement — not necessarily land-holders — then form cults and salt gangs that didn't have much in way in legal standing but tended to be wildly popular when people get really pissed off.

In a country with as big an economic activity and tax income as China — either of the two trying to get the mandate of heaven for themselves tended to build ridiculously big and opposing power bases that make for much more destructive wars.

For some reason, the succeeding imperial governments stuck with their Confucian classics and rent-seeking behaviour that they always regressed into a superstitious understanding of the mandate of heaven, failing to advance their political sciences in the process.

Perhaps, China is just that big that you'll get rich faster by becoming a bureaucrat than being an ever-frowned-upon merchant.
Conservative Confucianists will probably push back hard.
Were most of the Qing Mandarins IOTL really are that snobbish and ignorant in regards to the circulating western literature in Macau?
 
Were most of the Qing Mandarins IOTL really are that snobbish and ignorant in regards to the circulating western literature in Macau?
I suppose they desperately wanted to keep up legitimacy thur strong Confucianist credentials as a foreign dynasty and avoid the fate of the Yuan. The Ming will not have to deal with be a hundred Han Chinese secret societies and triads trying to sabotage and rebel rouse against then from the get go should they try to in-act western influenced reforms.
 
I wonder if they will ever stop being so bloody-minded about the idea of dynastic change and other forms of power struggles.
Until China as a concept dies they'll never stop thinking like that: China, unlike Rome always had a political aspect to it (the it'll always reunite bit) unlike how the Europeans just claiming the cultural aspect of it all when they claim to be the descendants of Rome. China being reunited every few hundred years meant that doing everything to reunite the disparate lands of the empire is something that must be done.
The Ming may have avoided the costly and expensive imjin war, but Japan is much stronger and wealthier because of it. The Ming have triumphed over the Jin but The Joseon and Yuan are growing stronger because of it. The empire may have opened itself to all trade in Macau but the western powers will profit and expand there destabilizing influence because of it. The Empire may have gotten some good emperors recently but the corruption that caused the Famines, plague, civil unrest, and court intrigue are still there and ready to bubble back up one a weaker emperor raised during the good times takes to the throne.
Yeah a bad emperor or two would make things spiral out of control quickly, considering that the main problems in the empire still haven't been rooted out.

The Yuan probably wouldn't be marching against the Chinese: the Russians would be a problem especially if the Cossacks and the such move against the Mongolians.
Perhaps, China is just that big that you'll get rich faster by becoming a bureaucrat than being an ever-frowned-upon merchant.
Considering that rice agriculture meant that you needed a lot more hands on deck but that you could make more calories it makes sense that being the guy who took taxes meant that you'd be making more money in general, and it also meant that the sciences were retarded because you could just find another dude to do stuff for you. Being a merchant didn't make a lot of sense unless you were in the South, where arable land was concentrated in the valleys and you're basically forced to leave as there isn't enough space when populations grow.
 
That probably won’t happen but Cambodia is closer to a protectorate now than just a simple tributary or vassal for sure.
hmm I meant in the long term like in the 19th century, but yeah this makes sense, considering how cambodia had a distinct culture and their own empires for centuries before thailand even existed.
 
Top