i was reading through another forum earlier today and people were discussing the terminology of elizabeth II in canada, and then it sorta devoled into one person saying had elizabeth the first had children then our current monarch would be on the scottish throne solely not the english
course i realised it was a load of twaddle, but it got my thinking on if lizzy had had a child, then would there ever have being a union between england and scotland, or would the events that lead up to our current monarchy ( james I, the civil war, the catholicism of james II and glorious revolution, the hanovarian dynasty, etc) still have taken place, but in some other shape or form and if not, woudl cotland and england/whales/ireland, be completly seperate to the modern day under alternate monarchies?
just wanted peoples thoughts on whether some form of union wouldve taken place, or if the scottish and english still be glaring at each other over "the wall"