There are many threads about more succesful French colonization of North America. But what about opposite scenario-no French presence north of Carribean? Maybe France conquers parts of Brazil ITTL , thus is more interested in South America and ignores Canada completly (or simply France is weaker/poorer). So beside England only Dutch and Swedes estabilished (short lived, like IOTL) colonies on N. America's eastern coast.
I guess English colonization goes smoother-not only French are absent-their OTL Native allies are also weakened without French support.
But conflict of interest between Colonies and Metropoly would propably arise earlier, Britain would want profits for metropoly from taxes and trade and colonists don't need British protection against France. Benefits from self-government should be obvious for settlers.
So earlier USA?