No GNW (or “Peter goes South”)

Great update. I'm looking forward to more. :)

One thing that might strain future Swedo-Russian relations are the serfs. OTL, some Russian serfs were espaping to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth int he 17th century due to the slightly better conditions there.

Karl XI tried to get serfdom abolished in Estonia and Livonia,but the motion was defeated in the parliament of both Duchies - he abolished it by decree in Ingria and Kexholm (not that there were many sefs in either province, but still). However, the reduction of noble held land in Estonia and Livonia meant a de facto if not de jure abolishment of serfdom - the Swedish crown freed the serfs it got from seized land, reintroduced the moving week (giving the serfs the right to choose another landlord and move from their current to their new one during one week of the year) and abolished the Estonian and Livonian nobility's right to "hand and neck", ie being police, prosecutor, judge and executioner all in one on their own estate, putting the legal rights in the hands of the Swedish governors and in theory (practise was something else entirely, as we all know) gave the Estonian and Livonian serfs equal rights before the law.

Estonian and Livonian nobility quickly had to improve their treatment of their serfs, in essence making them tenants, since otherwise they would all move to crown estates where they were treated better.

Some of the serfs and working force Peter moves to Ingria will pick up on the difference in treatment of their social class across the border and might escape, and Peter and/or the Russian nobility that "owns" these serfs will be wanting them back. I'm sure Karl XII will be happy to return most of them in the interest of good relations, but sooner or later there will be some case where Sweden refuses - perhaps because the serf has joined a Swedish garrison regiment and sworn an oath to the Swedish king and is in theory a Swedish subject now.

Karl might also do a shake-up of the government system of Estonia and Livonia - the nobility that would side with an outsider probably tried during the siege of Riga and can have their estates and title of nobility revoked, which might persuade the others in the parliaments to support a change where Karl XII can rule by decree as he can in Sweden, or at least a formal abolishment of serfdom.

Regardless, with the increased trade, there is bound to be new wealth created in Russia and with it some social change. Many of the goods Russia sell (tar, hemp, lumber) are "cash crops" made by the serfs, and there were historically small trade empires created by serfs who either bought their freedom or just hired others to deliver their due (usually day labour) to their landlords. With the earlier increased trade, there are bound to be more and earlier serf trade companies, and through them information will spread.

It will be interesting to see if this becomes a factor ITTL. :)
Valuable thought. .

AFAIK, in OTL Russia the serfs had been trying to escape in all directions: the PLC, Don, Sich, Ottoman Empire. The problem (for them) was that for most of them it was a long way to go with a very good chance to be intercepted, especially if they were trying to flee with the families and at least some movable property. With the Don government, IIRC, eventually came to an arrangement regarding their return (breaking the old tradition “there is no return from the Don”): as soon as status of the Cossacks of Don had been changed from the marginally tolerated bandits to the privileged servants of the crown (and the birder moved further to the South) their attitudes changed leaving the openings in the hosts of the border areas, etc.

Escaping into the PLC was easier: peasants in the Belorussian and Ukrainian areas used a similar language and were mostly Orthodox. Not the case with the Finns and Estonians. Of course, escapes would not be fully prevented but they would be difficult, especially if there is a lot of the low level trade is happening across the border and these peasants are not interested in strained relations with the Russian authorities.

Now, regarding the potential Russian-Swedish official issue on that account, well, most probably there would be an agreement attending to most of the cases so this should not be a major issue and in the situation you described an escaping serf simply would not be permitted to join a garrison: such a person would be easily identified by inability to communicate in German, Swedish, Finnish or Estonian. 😜 But surely handling such cases would be considered and properly documented: people of that period had been very good when it was coming to the bureaucracy.

As far as the rich serfs are involved, there were, indeed the very rich serfs engaged in a trade but you are slightly off regarding their relations with the owners. They were not doing “the daily work” (barschina) but going on “obrok”: agreed upon cash payments and perhaps some additional services (if the owner lived in his estate and a serf was operating in a city then perhaps some purchases or even contacts with the bureaucracy). They could not become members of the merchant guilds unless liberated by their owner (for payment or some valuable service) but other than that there was no restrictions to their activities. In the late XVIII - early XIX Count Sheremetev, one of the richest people in Russia (who scandalized CII by asking permission to marry his former serf, a star of his domestic theater, it took a while but eventually they did get married), considered it a some kind of amusement to have serfs-millionaries (probably simply very rich): he was not restricting their commercial activities but refused to accept pay off money. One of them got his freedom for being in a right time in a right place with a right stuff. He brough a barrel of oysters as a present to his master when the count, who was giving a banquet to his friends, found that he run out of oysters. Upon seeing the serf in a parlor he made him an offer: oysters ASAP for freedom, the serf immediately returned with a barrel on which his emancipation document had been signed.

But the less affluent owners would accept cash more eagerly because the Russian nobility was “systematically” short of it. So these emancipated serfs will join the merchant guilds and you know what would be their first desire? To get permission to own the serfs. CII bumped into that problem during the work of her Commission: the merchants asked for this right because they considered serfs more reliable than the salaried employees. This was XVIII Russia with its attitudes.
 
It would be a thing of beauty @von Adler if that manages to spread across the border into Russia in stead. Gradual emancipation of the serfs and the increase of literacy would be a game changer this early in Russian history. But it might be a little ASB.
Well, at least certain things simply may not happen because the Russian serfdom your are talking about is mostly a byproduct of Peter’s activities and CII’s usurpation of the throne. Neither had to happen in the OTL form so the whole thing may end up being what it was.
 
Valuable thought. .

AFAIK, in OTL Russia the serfs had been trying to escape in all directions: the PLC, Don, Sich, Ottoman Empire. The problem (for them) was that for most of them it was a long way to go with a very good chance to be intercepted, especially if they were trying to flee with the families and at least some movable property. With the Don government, IIRC, eventually came to an arrangement regarding their return (breaking the old tradition “there is no return from the Don”): as soon as status of the Cossacks of Don had been changed from the marginally tolerated bandits to the privileged servants of the crown (and the birder moved further to the South) their attitudes changed leaving the openings in the hosts of the border areas, etc.

Escaping into the PLC was easier: peasants in the Belorussian and Ukrainian areas used a similar language and were mostly Orthodox. Not the case with the Finns and Estonians. Of course, escapes would not be fully prevented but they would be difficult, especially if there is a lot of the low level trade is happening across the border and these peasants are not interested in strained relations with the Russian authorities.

Now, regarding the potential Russian-Swedish official issue on that account, well, most probably there would be an agreement attending to most of the cases so this should not be a major issue and in the situation you described an escaping serf simply would not be permitted to join a garrison: such a person would be easily identified by inability to communicate in German, Swedish, Finnish or Estonian. 😜 But surely handling such cases would be considered and properly documented: people of that period had been very good when it was coming to the bureaucracy.

As far as the rich serfs are involved, there were, indeed the very rich serfs engaged in a trade but you are slightly off regarding their relations with the owners. They were not doing “the daily work” (barschina) but going on “obrok”: agreed upon cash payments and perhaps some additional services (if the owner lived in his estate and a serf was operating in a city then perhaps some purchases or even contacts with the bureaucracy). They could not become members of the merchant guilds unless liberated by their owner (for payment or some valuable service) but other than that there was no restrictions to their activities. In the late XVIII - early XIX Count Sheremetev, one of the richest people in Russia (who scandalized CII by asking permission to marry his former serf, a star of his domestic theater, it took a while but eventually they did get married), considered it a some kind of amusement to have serfs-millionaries (probably simply very rich): he was not restricting their commercial activities but refused to accept pay off money. One of them got his freedom for being in a right time in a right place with a right stuff. He brough a barrel of oysters as a present to his master when the count, who was giving a banquet to his friends, found that he run out of oysters. Upon seeing the serf in a parlor he made him an offer: oysters ASAP for freedom, the serf immediately returned with a barrel on which his emancipation document had been signed.

But the less affluent owners would accept cash more eagerly because the Russian nobility was “systematically” short of it. So these emancipated serfs will join the merchant guilds and you know what would be their first desire? To get permission to own the serfs. CII bumped into that problem during the work of her Commission: the merchants asked for this right because they considered serfs more reliable than the salaried employees. This was XVIII Russia with its attitudes.

The difference is that ITTL, Sweden is a "spit" away, probably at Systerbäck/Sestra) and Narva, or even closer (depending whether Peter got all of Ingria or just a part of it) and that the friendly relations between Russia and Sweden are going to see far more Russian "merchant serfs" travelling to Reval, Viborg and Riga, or even Stockholm to trade. There were also a decent amount of Far Karelian Russian serfs, who spoke Karelian dialects of Finnish and at times even Swedish that would become "påsaryssar" (bag Russians) or "kontryssar" (backpack Russians) wandering traders who with backpacks of canvas or birch bark would travel extensive distances on foot to trade their surplus and exotic goods (such as silk handkerchiefs or silk headscarves that were immensely popular luxury goods among the rural peasants in Sweden and Finland) they acquired from Archangelsk or S:t Petersburg - OTL this trade happened in the late 18th century to the late 19th century, but I see it as likely that it would start earlier with the lack of devastation of war and friendly relations between Russia and Sweden.

Another factor is the Swedish (including Finland) peasant shipping - using galeases, yachts and other small ships, peasants usually co-owned ships between farms, and would send one of their own (and a few sons or farm hands) with a ship to sell their common surplus and if opportunity arose buy and sell other goods, usually sailing during Spring, Summer and Autumn and returning for winter. If Peter is undercutting other tolls (ITTL Swedish ones) to steer trade to S:t Petersburg, Karl might respond with cutting some tolls as well, and ease up some of the mercantilistic policies. OTL Swedish peasants north of Åland were not allowed to trade with foreign ports until 1741, but I could see Sweden easing those laws much earlier (they had been weakened already during the 30 years' war to increase toll income) and Swedish peasants starting to trade for some goods in S:t Petersburg. There are going to be Dutch and English/British merchants there wanting tar and lumber and there are bound to be some of the silk road goods finding its way up the Russian rivers to S:t Petersburg - OTL a group of Armenian merchants came to Stockholm with a load of raw silk to sell in the 1680s.

Sweden does not need to pay tolls in Öresund since 1645 (OTL this was re-introduced in the peace of 1720) so Swedish peasant sailers and other other merchants bringing their "cash crops" (often salted butter, tar, lumber, charcoal, wool, rape seed oil and in some cases flax or hemp) to sell in S:t Petersburg and buying Russian goods to sail with it to Göteborg or Hamburg where it can be re-sold to Dutch, English/British or North German (they still do a lot of sailing and trading, even if the days of the Hansa are gone) and avoid the Danish tolls should be a very profitable trade for all sides (except the Danes) until Russia has built up its own merchant fleet - which might never become large enough to completely replace this trade.

I find it possible that both Karl and Peter, who were intelligent reformers not too bound by their times (Karl never got much of a chance to enact his many ideas OTL) might find that less mercantilism and more trade is actually mutually profitable and quietly abolish much of the trade restrictions - part as a trade war to try to steer trade, part as finding through their trade "dispute" and dismantling mercantilist policies that it actually improves trade and thus their incomes from tolls.
 
Putting house in order (cont. 3)
19. Putting house in order (cont. 3)

19.6. Reorganization as a full time occupation

[A side notice serving to dispel certain illusions expressed in the earlier posts. 😉

Important thing to keep in mind is that Peter is doing the things his id doing in this TL not because he turned overnight into some kind of the XXI century “progressive” with the notions about human (and, specifically, women) rights, democratic institutions, universal literacy, animals rights, climate change and a long list of other things that were simply unknown in Russia of that period. In OTL quite a few of the terrible things he did (like strengthening serfdom) had been a toxic combination of the ideology (“westernization” at all costs) and extreme inefficiency. For example, extremely inefficiently conducted GNW required the “numbers”. So Peter made a life long military service starting from the ranks mandatory for all male nobles. Obviously, this was negatively impacting their abilities to manage the estates effectively (and hit their incomes) so as a bonus serfdom was turned almost to the slavery, so that they could squeeze the peasants harder, which, together with other Peter’s activities, resulted in a loss of the state income (the peasants had been fleeing and dying or simply incapable to pay the taxes), etc.

In this TL he does not have to do things in a rush, suffer the same huge losses and face the same problems. He also has a time to think and come to the conclusion that a slightly lower number of the better prepared military cadres is going to produce a better results than a mob of the raw recruits hastily brought to the front and the officers without any proper education. The nobles attending to their estates may manage them better even without their serfs being turned into the slaves and the greater output means that the state is getting the greater income on the custom dues and various indirect taxes. The same goes for the expenses related to the military schools and even a care about the retiring soldiers (besides filling the gaps with some employment areas, the government is getting a loyal military cast). ]


Besides the tactical and hardware level issues, the LNW produced a food for the thoughts on the “operational” level:
1. It became clear that the two-battalion infantry regiment of approximately 1,200 is too weak to operate as a reasonably independent unit.
2. It became clear that the “tactics of columns and shooting lines” would benefit from creation of the special troops with the greater training in the aimed fire and perhaps even creation of the special grenadier units out of the especially strong soldiers with the additional training in bayonet charges. The grenades should be gone.
3. It became clear that even with the better treatment of the recruits in the “recruitment depots”, their preparedness by the time of joining the fighting units is inadequate, especially in the areas requiring specific skills.
4. Cavalry, with its new aggressive tactics, was reasonably OK for the tasks it faced during the LNW but against the Tatars and Ottomans there would be a need not only in a heavy (cuirassiers and dragoons) cavalry but also in the light regular cavalry with a possibility of strengthening it with the irregulars: Cossacks of the Don, Kalmuks and “Russian” Tatars (from the Volga area).
5. There is a need for the “regular” organization of the field artillery into the standard batteries and higher level units with the addition of field engineers troops.
6. There is a need for having a standard organization above the regimental level: ad hoc divisions proved to be either too big or too small and their components lacked necessary coordination.
7. Related to the previous item, there was an obvious need for a division level staff filled with the officers competent in the logistics, capable of making the maps, etc.
8. To say that organization of the supplies could be improved would be a gross understatement. 😢
9. At least some consideration should be given to the fate of the old soldiers, invalids, etc.
10. As a mid-/long-term benefit, the military/naval schools of various types and levels must be created.

19.7 Simple part: the carrots

As a carrot of his own, Peter (inspired by the Order of the Sword) came with an idea of the whole system of the military and civic state awards of various levels applicable to everybody down to a rank soldier.

So far, Russia had only one award, Order of St. Andrew (with or without the diamonds).

Now, Peter added:
1. Order of Saint Alexander Nevsky “for those who had served their country with honor, mostly through political or military service”. In a hierarchy it was immediately below St. Andrew. [1]


1640547573950.jpeg


2. The Order of Saint Vladimir. The order had four degrees and was awarded for continuous civil and military service. For the military service it had the swords.
1640547905072.jpeg

The 4th, lowest, degree (cross with a ribbon ) could be awarded only for the military bravery and was always coming with the swords. In a hierarchy it was below St. Alexander.
1640548053938.jpeg

3. Last but not least at all, was the ultimate military carrot, Order of St. George [2], the highest military decoration of Russia. It had 4 classes and could be awarded exclusively for the wartime performance. The 1st class was reserved exclusively for the army commanders winning a battle or the whole campaign and the lower levels for the outstanding bravery and achievements. The lowest class, the greater stress on the personal bravery so a person carrying the 4th class cross practically had “here comes a hero” stamped on his forehead. Unlike, St. Vladimir, those who were getting the higher degrees had to wear the lower class(es) awards.
1640548609387.jpeg

An extra carrot was for the ranks. While the award itself was only for the officers, the soldiers and non-coms got their own 4 classes of the “sign of the military order” awarded exclusively for the outstanding bravery (and excluding its bearer from a physical punishment). [3]

To make this carrot even more tempting, the first awards had been postponed until the next war [4].

19.8. The hard part

Quite a few things had been done within the next few years.

Military issues:

1. The infantry regiments got the 3rd field battalion with the 4th (reserve battalion) staying in a site of the regiment’s permanent placement, handling all types of property and being used for training the new soldiers for this specific regiment.
2. The field artillery was organized in the batteries, 8 guns each (4 cannons and 4 unicorns) with the light batteries having 6 ponders and 1/4 poud and heavy 12 pounders and 1/2 poud, correspondingly. 2 batteries formed an artillery company and 2 of those (light and heavy) plus engineering company - an artillery brigade with 32 guns.
3. A standard infantry division division included 6 regiments, 2 jagers and 4 line [5], organized in 3 brigades, and and artillery brigade.
4. Cavalry division, light or heavy, had 4 - 6 regiments. There were still some problems with the light ones. The “uhlan” regiments had been formed out of the “extra” Ukrainian Cossacks from land militia (lance was a traditional Cossack weapon) and various types of the volunteers, the mounted jagers out of the best dragoon regiments and a couple of the hussar [6] regiments was formed out of the Wallachians, Serbs, Arnauts and Hungarians fleeing to Russia.
5. An issue of the competent staff officers still was more or less hanging in the air simply because there were not enough of those.
6. Commissariat service for the acting army was established with the expectation that it was going to follow the army (at a respectable distance) communicating with the authorities in the rear and with the (un)lucky population on the theater of war. In the worst case scenario this was providing the clearly defined scapegoats.
7. The arrangements had been made with the Cossacks of Don (whom Peter trusted more than the Ukrainian ones) to provide, in the case of war, few “hundreds” to be assigned to the infantry divisions for the scouting and for a separate corps to act with the main Russian army.
8. It was expected that in the case of war the Kalmuks are going to attack the Nogai Horde.
9. The first navigation school was created in Moscow [7] and so was the first Cadet Corps.

Nobility:
1. Distinction between the hereditary land (“votchina”) and the land granted for service (“pomestie”) was eliminated: all land owned by a noble was his unconditionally. This was a big bonus, at least theoretically.
2. The nobles did not have to attend a life long mandatory military service and were given an option of retirement after the 10 years of service.
3. The nobles could not be sentenced to the bodily punishment (beating by a knout, whipping). Of course, this did not apply to the flogging during the education process, this was a necessary part of the education. When in the service, a noble could not be beaten by his superior (which did not apply to Peter’s “personal rights” to punish his entourage 😜).
4. They may not serve at all but a family, in which not a single man served (in the military or civic administration) within two generations, was deprived of its noble status (but not of its property including the serfs), including the right to attend military schools for nobility and entering military service as an officer; at least in theory, they could be conscripted into the army as the rank soldiers and, in practice, they would not be exempt from paying the individual taxes and freedom from a physical punishment would be revoked. They could enter the civic service at the lowest level or a military one as a soldier and return the family status by raising to the lieutenant rank or its civic equivalent by the Table of the Ranks (options: being wounded in the action, receiving soldier’s St. George of the 1st class, which mans all lower classes as well, etc.).
5. Their rights toward the serfs were slightly regulated. They could not execute them, they could not sell them without the families, they could not demand more than 4 days per week of work for the estate owner.


Soldiers:
1. Had to serve 25 years unless completely incapacitated. In both cases he becomes a free man with status of a peasant (but can’t be turned into a serf).
2. After 10 years of service were allowed to have family and live in their own homes within military settlement.
3. After 15 years they could be moved into the reserve battalions to train the recruits.
4. After 25 years they may be left in a service with the options of being moved from the active service to some other duties, being sent to the garrison units, joining police force, being employed for performing the menial duties in the military and civic institutions, military schools, warehouses, etc.
5. The first shelter for the invalids was created in Izmailovo after the old wooden palace of Tsar Alexey started falling apart and its inhabitant, Tsaritsa Praskovia, had to be relocated to a better place: two wings had been added to the Pokrov Cathedral (below) and the invalids could keep maintaining the existing orchards and hot houses, which had been providing Peter with his favorite fruits [9].
6. The soldiers’ children had right to get education in the state-sponsored military schools (not those for the nobles) providing cadres for the future non-com professionals, from the scribes to the artillerymen.
7. A rank soldier could be promoted for bravery (soldier’s cross of St. George was a must) into the low officer rank and from this point to be treated as any other officer with a chance of getting a personal nobility (rank of a captain or St. George 4th class or St. Vladimir 4th class) or even a hereditary nobility (colonel or St.G/St.V of 4th and 3rd classes).


1640554331726.jpeg


Basically, Peter was creating a loyal military caste completely separated from the serfs while somewhat diminishing dependance of the central power from the landowners class.
___________
[1] In OTL Peter was planning its creation but died and it was officially created by CI.
[2] Actually, introduced by CII.
[3] In OTL introduced only in 1807 but would it take a genius to figure out things like that even without Nappy with his Legion of Honor? 😉
[4] Don’t underestimate importance of this “carrot”: the main reason why Potemkin was given an army command in the second Ottoman war of CII was because he wanted St. George 1st class and this was the only way for him to get it. I don’t think that CII was dumb enough that he is patently unqualified for the army command and he did not …er… “disappoint” her in managing almost to screw the siege of Ochakov and then proceeding with almost screwing the war (even he was not capable of wrestling the defeat out of the jaws of victory). 😉
[5] Terminology may be confusing taking into an account that the “line” infantry should be fighting mostly in the columns but this is nothing comparing to the terminological confusion of the Napoleonic army. Jomini argued that a huge column at Waterloo was a byproduct of a misunderstanding: Napoleon ordered a standard divisional column (“division” being two platoons) and the recipients decided that he wanted the whole (real) division in a single column.
[6] Not the heavy Polish hussars who fought their last serious battle in Kliszow, but the Hungarian style light cavalry.
[7] As in OTL
[8] But, if convinced of a crime, their status could be revoked so…
[9] Of course, this was done much later.
 
Last edited:
2. It became clear that the “tactics of columns and shooting lines” would benefit from creation of the special troops with the greater training in the aimed fire and perhaps even creation of the special grenadier units out of the especially strong soldiers with the additional training in bayonet charges. The grenades should be gone.
Considering that Sweden actively used grenades during this era, which worked fine as the infantry battalion was commanded to fire its last salvo within throwing distance and the whole battalion then charged with pike, sword and bayonet, the experience should perhaps be that grenades should be used, and later experience against the Ottomans showing that they are ineffective when not fighting in the Swedish style.

While other powers usually had a grenadier company in each regiment (and Sweden had too for the German garrison regiments), the indelta regiments instead had a certain number of grenadiers per company that were usually deployed on the flank of the battalion and as bodyguards for the battalion commander.

OTL, the Swedish 1693 and 1701 regulation for the infantry said that the grenadier should fire his musket with the last salvo (30 paces away from the enemy, ~27 meters), then throw his musket on his back and light and throw his grenade as the battalion charged.

OTL I think Russia introduced grenadiers 1704. I think it would be realistic for Peter to introduce them (they're western, after all) after seeing their successful use by the Swedes, and then abolish them, or at least their grenades, when they prove ineffective against the Ottomans.
 
Considering that Sweden actively used grenades during this era, which worked fine as the infantry battalion was commanded to fire its last salvo within throwing distance and the whole battalion then charged with pike, sword and bayonet, the experience should perhaps be that grenades should be used, and later experience against the Ottomans showing that they are ineffective when not fighting in the Swedish style.

While other powers usually had a grenadier company in each regiment (and Sweden had too for the German garrison regiments), the indelta regiments instead had a certain number of grenadiers per company that were usually deployed on the flank of the battalion and as bodyguards for the battalion commander.

OTL, the Swedish 1693 and 1701 regulation for the infantry said that the grenadier should fire his musket with the last salvo (30 paces away from the enemy, ~27 meters), then throw his musket on his back and light and throw his grenade as the battalion charged.

OTL I think Russia introduced grenadiers 1704. I think it would be realistic for Peter to introduce them (they're western, after all) after seeing their successful use by the Swedes, and then abolish them, or at least their grenades, when they prove ineffective against the Ottomans.
But in this TL the Russian tactics is different both from the Swedish and their own OTL tactics. The Swedes did attack in the linear formations but here the Russians are using the real battalion columns (so there are not too much “flanks”) and their tactics is much more simple and straightforward: march very fast toward the enemy, fire (the first two ranks) at the point blank range and charge with the bayonets. The grenadiers are valuable as the strongest/best quality soldiers and can be used either as a reserve for the final blow or to lead the charge. As you may notice, there are no pikes either.


The fundamental thing to keep in mind is that in this TL Peter is not trying to emulate the Swedes or anybody else. He is getting convinced that it will take too long to drill his soldiers up to the same degree of perfection and is looking for a simple but efficient model pretty much the same way as the French did during the revolution (it was obvious that the Austrians and Prussians will always be better drilled). Actually, with the certain adjustment this was what really happened in the OTL: tactical decisions used by Rumyantsev, Suvorov, etc. against the Ottomans were considered by the contemporaries as simplistic (and, by this reason, winning).
 
Last edited:
Well, at least certain things simply may not happen because the Russian serfdom your are talking about is mostly a byproduct of Peter’s activities and CII’s usurpation of the throne. Neither had to happen in the OTL form so the whole thing may end up being what it was.
Interesting, I did not know. Your update below also clarified a lot.

. The soldiers’ children had right to get education in the state-sponsored military schools (not those for the nobles) providing cadres for the future non-com professionals, from the scribes to the artillerymen.
Did this happen OTL? Cause that sounds like it could be a great way to push more literacy. Though we're not talking about millions of children yet
 
Interesting, I did not know. Your update below also clarified a lot.


Did this happen OTL? Cause that sounds like it could be a great way to push more literacy. Though we're not talking about millions of children yet
Cantonists underage sons of conscripts in the Russian Empire. From 1721 on they were educated in special "canton schools". for future military service (the schools were called garrison schools in the 18th century).

“Cantonist schools were established by the 1721 decree of Tsar Peter the Great that stipulated that every regiment was required to maintain a school for 50 boys. Their enrollment was increased in 1732, and the term was set from the age of 7 to 15. The curriculum included grammar and arithmetic, and those with a corresponding aptitude were taught artillery, fortification, music and singing, scrivenery, equine veterinary science, or mechanics. Those lacking in any talent were taught carpentry, blacksmithing, shoemaking and other trades useful to the military. The ablest ones were taught for additional 3 years, until the age of 18. All entered military service at the completion of their studies. The decree of 1758 required all male children of the military personnel to be taught in the cantonist schools. In 1798 a military "asylum-orphanage" was established in St Petersburg, and all regimental schools were renamed after it, the total enrollment reaching 16,400.” During the reign of NI the number reached 36,000. In a reality, part regarding “all” ended up being full of the exemptions.

Sons of the officers, civilian officials and clergy had a priority in being admitted by they rarely applied and majority of the students had been legitimate and illegitimate sons of the soldiers. The additional categories: sons of the poor Finns, Gipsies, Jews, orphans and sons of the Polish nobles who could not prove their noble status.

Peter founded the 1st school of that type in 1701 without special provisions regarding social background and it was providing military, naval and civic specialists.
 
Last edited:
Cool! So what butterfly can we realistically have flap so we could multiply that? How about each arsenal, gun foundry and even iron works etc having to do the same as they needed better labourers? If I recall correctly OTL these already had a lot of people working for them (you must have told me @alexmilman) but they lacked efficiency. If Peter’s army works way more efficient past reform, we might have a Peter that loves efficency in more areas, including those of logistics and supply?
 
Cool! So what butterfly can we realistically have flap so we could multiply that? How about each arsenal, gun foundry and even iron works etc having to do the same as they needed better labourers? If I recall correctly OTL these already had a lot of people working for them (you must have told me @alexmilman) but they lacked efficiency. If Peter’s army works way more efficient past reform, we might have a Peter that loves efficency in more areas, including those of logistics and supply?
Let’s not get overly enthusiastic and stick to a reality. 😉

To start with, even if Peter wanted something of the kind, there were simply not enough people to provide a formal education on the extended scale. As for the better workers, usually they were learning their skills at their workplaces and, judging by the volume of Russian iron production, there were no problems with the efficiency all the way to the Age of Steam, which is far away.
The same goes for the army’s efficiency: it was not based upon the soldiers’s literacy and the main purpose of the cantonists was to fill the gaps in the areas unrelated directly to the fighting (scribes, engineers. etc.). Nobody bothered to teach the soldiers. I’m not even sure that literacy of the peasants was considered a good thing at that time.
 
The enemies
[I have to apologize: by whatever reason the chapter was posted before I finished it and then most of it just disappeared leaving me with a need to restore whatever I could by memory. This was really annoying and I lost some of the information. 😢 I really hate when the software decides that it knows better.]


20. The enemies and what to do about them

20.1. The enemies

On paper, the Ottoman Empire had (or at least supposedly could raise) a huge army, well beyond one of any of its potential enemies. But both the real numbers and quality of these troops were a completely different issue.

The Janissary had been steadily turning into the artisans-traders corporation. The old system of recruiting them exclusively from the child slaves was abandoned and since the time of Murad III anybody could join and most of those joining never really served did not get salary but were getting the privileges. The “ortas”, which should had 800 - 1,000, usually had only 200 - 300: out of 50,000 on paper only 20,000 had been on the active service (getting salary). There was no uniform weaponry and, starting from mid-XVIII, everybody was buying it at his expense. Most of the Janissary had the flintlocks of the old models without the bayonets. Training was limited to just getting the basic individual skills with the firearms and swords but there was no training in the formations.
1640634911208.png

To add the numbers the Sultans allowed to their regional officials and pretty much anybody with the money to get a patent for hiring the armed bands (foot and cavalry) for 6 months with the further 2 months prolongations. These troops did not have any training whatsoever and no uniformity in the terms of the weapons. Usually, each of them had been looking as a walking arsenal. Additionally, there were small groups of the religious fanatics who swore to fight exclusively with the swords. f





Cavalry. With a failure of timar system the best Ottoman cavalry troops had been steadily shrinking in numbers and even these numbers were misleading: their armed bands (which they could not maintain anymore) turned into the camp followers used for building fortifications and other similar functions. Having 2,000 of them per 1,000 warriors was quite common.
1640636755426.jpeg

As a result of the discrepancy between the paper numbers (for which government was paying), the real numbers of the fighters and the numbers of the salaried noncombatants, a true fighting force could be few times smaller than declared.


The artillery was a true “beauty” because the Ottomans mostly stuck with the enormous guns firing the stone balls of 20-70kg and, in general, their calibers were all over the place. The field artillery had been transported by the oxen and in a battle it was routinely placed in a static near the camp. “Their carriages are so bad and the crews are so inept that not only can’t they aim to the enemy but even to move them. As a result, they just keep firing at the same place causing minimal damages”. Of course, these huge guns had a ling range but this was more than offset by the slow rate of fire and absence of the precision. There were also some tiny guns firing the shots of 100-200grams also causing a minimal damage. The gun below was casted in the late XVIII and it was still firing the 50kg stone balls.
1640637156438.jpeg



The army was handicapped by the huge numbers of non-combatants, very big baggage train and the problems related to the need to move the monstrous cannons along the imperfect roads.

The battle tactics did make some sense against the opponents using the linear tactics. The infantry was facing enemy from behind the field fortifications and then could rush out of them in a huge mob-style column. If the enemy’s line broken, the cavalry would attack trying to encircle and exterminate the small groups of enemy’s soldiers.


Now, the last but not least, there were the Crimeans. Numbers regarding their numbers are all over the place but it seems that by this time the able-bodied Tatar population of the Khanate was in the range of 240-250,000. Which means that the host sizes of 200-400,000 are rather on a fantastic side. It looks like that a raiding force led by the Khan personally may amount up to 80,000 and by Kalga-Sultan (his son) up to 60,000. Out of that number only 1-2,000 of the Khan’s Guards (infantry) would have the firearms. The raid could be joined by 1-2,000 Ottoman infantry garrisoning Kaffa.

The ordinary raiders would have the bows and, optimistically, the swords or just the sharpened sticks with horse bone tied to them. Their battle worthiness was quite low because fighting the battles was not a purpose of their raids and because it looks like their bows were pretty much useless against the properly led regular troops.
 
Last edited:
The enemies and what to do about them
20.2 And what to do about them..

None of the above was a big secret: the Ottomans already fought this way against the Austrians and Poles. The problem was to find a simple remedy that can be implemented reasonably fast and would not involve the fantastic requirements like turning the Russian army into a perfect replica of the Austrian troops [1]. Of course, Peter’s first impulse was to do exactly that emphasizing a firepower and generally defensive posture. This approach was actually working, with tge various degrees of success, since 1572 when it provided the Tsardom’s victory in the battle of Molodi. It even worked, to some degree, during the second Perekop campaign of Vasily Golitsyn (even if the whole campaign ended with a fiasco). But OTOH, it definitely did not work at the Konotop.

The main task was to figure out the solution allowing to operate easily both offensively and defensively with a minimal risk of having the broken formations and with taking a maximum advantage pf a much better field artillery. A proposed answer was in the combination of already adopted battalion columns and their ability to rearrange themselves into the regimental and even divisional squares [2] with the field artillery at the front and corner. These squares could form two or three lines with a cavalry on the flanks and at the rear.

There are two basic scenarios:

Scenario 1. The formation would have to approach the Ottomans hiding behind the firticications in a fast step holding its fire and disregarding the losses until getting into a range of the effective grapeshot. While the artillery is dealing with the Ottomans, the infantry charges with the bayonets.

Scenario 2. The Ottomans are charging from their position trying to break the Russian squares. To start with, the artillery is firing at them at a point blank range. The gaps in the first line of the squares allows a second line to charge at the points where the 1st line seems to be endangered. The Ottoman cavalry riding in small groups between the squares is decimated by the fire and then counter-attacked by the Russian cavalry. The Crimeans are usually reluctant to attack the orderly infantry formations but if they do, they should be easily repelled [4].

Modifications are possible but the principle should stay: the regimental squares are big enough to act as the independent parts of a battle order and if enemy’s numeric advantage is too big, the divisional squares should be used.

Then comes the critical issue of the logistics which so far undermined both Golitsyn’s campaigns [5]. One thing is more or less obvious, transportation by the rivers must be used to the maximum extent and then Azov flotilla may provide a reasonably safe supply line to the peninsula’s coast along which all important Crimean and Ottoman towns are located.

The Cossacks of the Sich are going to start raiding the coast using their boats eventually being helped by the Russian rowing vessels.

The Kalmuks and Cossack of Don have to attack the Nogais and force them to relocate to the South of Kuban.

For a meaningful naval opposition the Ottomans would have to bring the ships from the Med because now they don”t have any significant naval force on the Black Sea.


The main goal of the war is going to be squeezing the Ottomans out of the Northern coast of the Black Sea from the Dniester to the Kuban River.

________________
[1] The Swedish experience was great but so far only the Germans had been successfully fighting the Ottomans.
[2] Which did not have to be the perfect squares: their front could be longer than the flanks.
[3] Which were not expected to be big due to the enemy’s training deficiencies.
[4] They are there exclusively for the loot, not for the suicidal heroics.
[5] On this subject Prince Vasily could provide an exhaustive information: his new assignments are much closer to his spheres of competence and he does not look for the military command.
 
Не забывайте про Молдавию. Дмитрий Кантемир в те годы в Стамбуле но, вероятно уже имеет связи с русскими. Его брат Антиох стал молдавским деспотом в 1705
 
Не забывайте про Молдавию. Дмитрий Кантемир в те годы в Стамбуле но, вероятно уже имеет связи с русскими. Его брат Антиох стал молдавским деспотом в 1705
English forum so no Russian without translation
 
Не забывайте про Молдавию. Дмитрий Кантемир в те годы в Стамбуле но, вероятно уже имеет связи с русскими. Его брат Антиох стал молдавским деспотом в 1705
Don't forget about Moldavia. Dmitrie Cantemir is residing at Stambul as of the time period, but probably has already contacted Russians (Note by me: A certain Mr. Tolstoy was at diplomatic mission there in the time period). His brother Antioch became a Despot/hospodar of Moldavia in 1705.

Translated:)
 
Great tl , i would be really nice if there was more maps , also will there be diferences in the colonization of siberia ? a more effective colonization of it would really benefit russia in the long term .
 
Seems like Swedes TTL also invented this award earlier than OTL, because when it's not a contemporary of Catherine's crosses you're using, it dates from 1748 OTL.
I know and this is in the comments: unlike practical steam engine, machine guns and other technological anachronisms popular in the genre, there is absolutely nothing preventing earlier appearance of these awards. 😜
 
Great tl , i would be really nice if there was more maps , also will there be diferences in the colonization of siberia ? a more effective colonization of it would really benefit russia in the long term .
Even more maps? I thought that I’m overdoing them. Anyway, sometimes it is difficult to find a map without a “wrong” dates, borders or names on it. 😢 But I’ll try.
Colonization of Siberia is a complicated subject which requires an additional research and a clear definition of what is “Siberia”: actually, it ends well before the Pacific. But making substantial changes means wars with the Dzungars and China.
OTOH, an earlier discovery of the Siberian gold is definitely tempting. 😉
 
Last edited:
Top