You need to reread history as you've written complete BS and show a source for Reagan saying something along those lines because according to the documents released from that time period there is NOTHING but a complete neutrality from Reagan and not wanting war at all;
This from the Wall Street Journal about declassified discussions released in 2012
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303816504577313852502105454
Two sources, one of them from George Washington university that also has a similar Reagan quote. But whatever, i guess a major research university is a BS source.
As i said, I can get more sources for you if you want. This topic is pretty thoroughly well analyzed in the US and UK.
You can squawk all you want about Reagan being neutral, but the historical records say otherwise
As to your source, the word "Almost" features in pretty much every line. The Reagan led government ultimately CHOSE to support the UK, that is evidenced in your own source (and the fact that they unofficially offered the UK an amphibious carrier, USS Iwo Jima, is a matter of record). So what is your point? Your own source lays out clearly that in the end the US chose to back the UK, at least tacitly. If your argument was secretary of sate Haig supported the Argentina claim, then sure, but Haig wasn't the one who was ultimately calling the shots was he? Reagan was and the US ultimately backed Britain, but politically and materially, regardless of "what might have been" this is what is recorded as what
actually happened, and if you are confusing the two then you need to seriously do more research.