informationfan
Banned
Are you saying you can't understand the simplest point or that you can understand so you try and change the subject?
steve... tsts, you have the problem of wankism... i just tried to help you
if you learn how unimportant "your" nation is today, you maybe start to be less problematic?
we even agree about the russian army in another plot, but you still repeat your silly "everything is about balance-of-power" (right) but ignore the facts (that ecerything is about balance-of-power!
you can add some numbers... look at the development in numbers for greatbritain and german kaiserreich... from 1872-1914
now explain why the germans can change anything about the confrontation by NOT building a fleet.
Germany and great britain in the early 20th century means war. early or late... maybe you do not know what certain british politicans said in 1906 about invasion in germany? (i like the idea, they try to land and later on they need to beg for the return of their army
you should just accept that some things are not for moral positions (defend belgium) but for ecomic decisions, made 10 or 20 years before.
it is still hope
and - i do not change the subject
the subject is that you fail that economic motivation was the biggest movement in the 19th and 20th century... hitler, for example NEEDED the war with poland, cause otherwise germany had been bankrupted... it was since early 1939... even with the money they found in slowakia...
so i suggest you really calm down and look deeper in such things
thank you