You're back here again?
<pulls himself up from the ground> Sigh, yes
What's this your 1,000,000,000th TL?
Give or take
You need to make a promise
Sigh, If I don't complete this, I won't make another timeline outside of Shared Worlds
Now that that's in order, don't f**k this up
I probably will

Just in case you didn't read the original, the POD is that Dwight D. Eisenhower doesn't run for re-election, the official POD is August 15, 1955 (the day he announces), but the changes don't really start until 1956. Also, instead of just caring about what's happening in the U.S alone, I'll put a lot of focus on foreign policy (for once).
 
Update1: 1956 primaries
The world was shocked when president Dwight D. Eisenhower announced that he would not be running for re-election. Eisenhower endorsed his vice-president Richard Nixon to be the Republican nominee. There was really no challenge to Nixon outside of favorite sons and he easily gained the nomination.

MH75KtFJ41639PvtkGerpmGymDKhvQfGI-r1ssOXdw6p3Lvm-TXYSQrspCSbq0e3LW39CdNGTv7pGmXutiPCQVIbmfltDwugJ2g4sVjxn_nL4hcQ-cuUrBVkZiGCqyq-UII4oHyn


On the Democratic side Minnesota senator Hubert Humphrey looked like the best possible candidate. His support for Civil Rights made him popular in the northeast. While the fact that he hailed from the midwest helped him in midwestern states. His primary opponents were Adlai Stevenson and Estes Kenaver. Humphrey attacked Stevenson, who was the previous nominee that he was a stale, old, candidate of the past. This eliminated Humphrey's main opponent in the midwest. Kenever suffered from the fact that there wasn’t that many southern primaries, so he couldn’t get his possible southern supporters to really effect the primary election.

83QY9r0lzmGx9dEz4NbUUcycdOfQVByeaGLLaNL086cwxC-UUKUfD5sDTbQEWvSIvkOy381EvtoiP473aladFBMZf72Aq0XEK24h9wP8g2q7M00hsYMDlIFR9mu_W-6B_bOg3HIO

---------------------------------------------------
Sorry, couldn't resist doing this redux. I've been thinking about this since I stopped the original and I couldn't find a better time to redux. EDIT: Sorry, meant to say that Hubert Humphrey was a senator
 
Last edited:
Update 2: Election Buildup
No responses? Oh, well I guess I'll just have to impress you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


After both nominations had been wrapped up a new candidate emerged. Storm Thurmond. Thurmond had been a staunch segregationist and disliked the nomination of Hubert Humphrey. Thurmond announced that he would run as a Dixiecrat. The same party Thurmond ran under in 1948. Humphrey payed no mind to the Dixiecrats. While many were afraid of a hung electoral college Humphrey knew that any votes he lost in the south could be replaced by votes in the midwest and northeast. Richard Nixon tried to appeal to southerners by nominating John S. Cooper of Kentucky as his running mate. Humphrey chose charismatic young senator John F. Kennedy to be his running mate. Thurmond selected segregationist John S. Battle as his running mate. Many were preparing for an exciting election night.




 
Update 3: 1956 presiental election
The election was always going to be a close one. Humphrey attacked Nixon on his record, while Nixon attacked Humphrey's lack of experience, Thurmond attacked both of them for “not respecting the South’s interests”. The campaign was a battle. But in the end a winner was declared.

12XHTLr3YnFXHe8vNdTjCDz45F7hpq2AvRmkXmVQ-jxXgEBilhHOp4sBsNhztU2wEOzjy547WuoxnIJ15_cVllrsI7Hj50v-LjgWQKaerxEnY-1fYmepMhQi7zTTW8QUk1lM2u5N


O-_hJHGa1q6DdPpFAO4uuuq2uWksKBygyAFhcdol-pK0YX1d2EuMlB79nmkpRZnNZ6Bc4hslfxV37ZW2KgtfbO2TZwmdkKFeTN5ool3CjQ7YAJcqnaXXppGIrsLUTTDrEAdrUT_P


Hubert H. Humphrey/ John F. Kennedy

Richard M. Nixon/ John S Cooper

James Strom Thurmond/ John S. Battle



“We are now happy to announce that Hubert Horatio Humphrey is now the 35th president of the United States of America” -Walter Cronkite
 
Update 4: 1958 midterms
Update today
In other news here's the update
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


During the first year of the Humphrey administration a recession began, many Republicans blamed the bad economy on Humphery and the Democrats, therefore giving them a boost in the midterms.



After his disastrous loss to Hubert Humphrey Richard Nixon returned to his home state of California. He knew that his career was not over. He announced that he was going to run for governor of California. He immediately became the frontrunner. He was more qualified than his opponent and had more name recognition. His numbers dipped after his opponent, Pat Brown claimed that Nixon had betrayed California to become vice-president, but Nixon could not be stopped.

IazdXB4_86uZOLFRzxgXLAG8y_UYC87Be7rSdm7zbw-FjdFHb1aPO6wgDMlVdsJl5E8LGFl2FMHYWpl0IFKIeLNOTAGd-2ElxjDWeUhZ2jZOutiltqw4-mrDSAWTIEQfN1O0wd7_


Alaska would have its first gubernatorial election in 1958. Republican John Butrovich Jr. used the recession to attack the Democrats. Butrovich campaigned hard. Running all over the state for support. Butrovich’s opponent, opponent also campaigned hard, but he just couldn’t shake the rescission off. The election was close, but in the end Butrovich won.

u3D_NqGjsTSny6poxsxrw0KSWS1tCf1pEAFvMQCrSZid4rB2f-vP93zvEEf2WNcY1IxQ0zA98piSUxJU0SBcAbyZkTZbsHJHj4Onpr4URVOVYy_Or6b6VVuPVpczA92gWkkUjk37


Even though Egan lost the governor’s race he eventually came back and ran for senator in 1960. Afterwards he ran an unsuccessful presidential campaign in 1972.



The Republicans hadn’t held the lead in the house since 1952. In 1958 the Republicans had an advantage because of the recession. The Republicans managed to gain a lead because of this. A notable freshman was T.R.M Howard, a African-American civil rights leader from Illinois’s first district.

rYud7Uk7kBEgcAK6eBMynzyqX5pLp76kb2S5ne7I0GdpZKp6c6EmAJc7Y1ZZzeIQDPQ9ewbJd_3OHtCe2RosgY51ZnCnPcW1LpZMrhxAMA3U_WGHk-GQ-QaHp0CqmSNKMGDA040P


In the senate Republicans continued their winning streak. They managed to gain 3 seats to tie the senate. For the Democrats, they only had one freshman who wasn’t from a new state, Thomas J. Dodd of Connecticut. The Democrats only had a lead because of Kennedy’s tie-breaking vote. The end results did not look good for the Democrats. Many were expecting a Humphrey loss in the 1960 election.

jkUodrtDgZC7_fZffb9LC7pPemlfow8EqqlLNY3tKP0xGrvAeJRhDFfYO9p6aTb2x_X63s3eq9NsSkaSTjNEUYlGEZqcScJVrK_REXsxAWKcNobKRcXBwyjNJHB94N-IMCIlVqje
 
Update 5: The Humphery Adminatriation
“Under my administration, the words ‘Liberty and Justice for all’ and ‘All men are created equal’ will ring the loudest.” -From Hubert Humphrey's inauguration address



Hubert Humphrey's administration began on a happy note. He had overcome a serious challenger in Richard Nixon. As his presidency began Humphrey began to try to push Civil Rights through Congress. He passed the Civil RIghts Act of 1957. The act would ban literacy tests which were not only used to disenfranchise blacks, but other minorities and poor whites. It also banned discrimination in public places, banned state discrimination, banned discrimination of schools, added a bipartisan group called the United States Commission on Civil Rights to defend civil rights, abolished the poll tax, and banned any federally funded agencies from discrimination, if they did not obey they would lose their federal funding. Humphrey's push for civil rights legislation helped insure that the Democrats would have the African-American vote in future elections.





While the Civil Rights act of 1957 was important for the Humphrey administration, the recession of 1958 hit the administration hard. The Democrats no longer looked like the party that would save the economy. The Democrats suffered big losses in midterm elections and it made the Humphrey administration worried about the next election.



Humphrey's administration became the one to start the space race. On October 4th 1957 the Soviet Union attempted to launch a satellite into space, named Sputnik 1. However, the satellite exploded on launch. After their failures the Soviet Union used a satellite that they had been working on called object D (Sputnik 3 in OTL). They renamed it Lenin 1, because it was to be launched on Lenin’s birthday, and launched it on April 20, 1958. The launch was successful and attracted the attention of the Humphrey administration. Humphrey decided that it was time to create a space program, or else he’d look weak compared to the Soviets. Humphery set up the National Space Exploration Agency (NSEA) as a reaction to this. Humphrey put former Under Secretary of State for Harry Truman James E. Webb as head of NSEA.

Q2hiUuOOgVr6sOucqguDCjeSHNPnl4WbONbV854Tfy6K7ama4AtogsOGF_W8xTtzsblx1Cd8GGgDDHXNPCaATJVK1qF4x7NY2WUueFYziNB5CZF4DtWSuUYo00xTZciN2F2bMF3A


Under the Humphrey administration he appointed the first ever woman to the Supreme Court, Florence Ellinwood Allen. Allen had been a judge in the United States Court of Appeals since 1934. Her nomination marked a great moment for women’s rights in the United States. She was confirmed by the senate on March 21st 1957. Jeannette Rankin, the first women to ever serve in the House of Representatives said:

“Today is a great day for women everywhere. We can tell our little girls in this country that they can do anything if the put their mind to it! They can be a member of the Supreme Court, of the Senate, of the House, heck, they can be president! Thank you Hubert Humphrey for finally breaking the glass ceiling that has hung above our heads for so long! Thank you Florence Ellinwood Allen for showing the world that women can do anything!”

kkY_olSSdeGxKKFKMXwEppoRvgEkzuPm3LK79WKeUAAOQOqApCpuVDHMf2_c0k73qLez9jlNnoJah5L8jLXth31P7bAwoJ5VvW_UPUwA_IvNageb_J9VofLI2kPuQJAgrvnbNGv0


vS6a9-6sD5mh_b3nsm0kYEBHozIJRUcaXfsVZMpzb4eI4_Gf4Ve-kQzJ84jJqxRzDH6YplMF94Ux1YRbhm3xISk_J0CabkdHx3cfkg-J3J2KDrI52DeyRteFV0eZARKENu65Ax0k


Other Hubert Humphrey Supreme court nominations:

William J. Brennan Jr. (1957)
Peter Woodbury (1959)
 
Cuba
At some points during the Cuban Revolution it looked like the rebels could win. However, on July 29th Batista’s army started the Battle of Las Mercedes. With U.S support Batista’s army wiped out Castro’s army. In late August of ‘58 Batista’s army killed Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, Raul Castro, and several other revolutionaries. The war would be over by the end of 1958 and would be a big victory for opposers of Communism.

jVacykwlZjxx5wwoOLlP8rGcODTtSxnzEbN2bAxJi_ejI7fRsPawSJ88pnJ_rjXa_kxcT7zNdO9sAKVTVp2bk6Ejkk99Hp_FWqgmTE_DRyxaol8SBDSvy-m50Kyn6Qd1tJ9-sNWc


After the success of Batista’s army, president Humphrey told him to begin to hold free and fair elections or else they would lose an ally. Batista did, not just because of the U.S but he expected his Progressive Action Party to win because of the win in the war.

8ccAzMbMpWrrZ0zo6D8mFbMiL6Q2L-WCBuPq2nhXpmFxqpY2C2rRC6lS88-V70FZeuLSOmIcngD4SDIk_n1lBpSz_H6z3AQSGyKOh7a2YUa8vWcceU1-mG71YIWsK8w4_D_KPWgR


While the loss of the Progressives was unexpected, it was not unexplainable. People were tired of the Batista administration. While the win in the war and the return to free elections were important, many could see that both of these things had the U.S behind them. People were tired of being the U.S's puppet and voted for a change.
 

dcharles

Banned
The world was shocked when president Dwight D. Eisenhower announced that he would not be running for re-election. Eisenhower endorsed his vice-president Richard Nixon to be the Republican nominee. There was really no challenge to Nixon outside of favorite sons and he easily gained the nomination.

MH75KtFJ41639PvtkGerpmGymDKhvQfGI-r1ssOXdw6p3Lvm-TXYSQrspCSbq0e3LW39CdNGTv7pGmXutiPCQVIbmfltDwugJ2g4sVjxn_nL4hcQ-cuUrBVkZiGCqyq-UII4oHyn


On the Democratic side Minnesota senator Hubert Humphrey looked like the best possible candidate. His support for Civil Rights made him popular in the northeast. While the fact that he hailed from the midwest helped him in midwestern states. His primary opponents were Adlai Stevenson and Estes Kenaver. Humphrey attacked Stevenson, who was the previous nominee that he was a stale, old, candidate of the past. This eliminated Humphrey's main opponent in the midwest. Kenever suffered from the fact that there wasn’t that many southern primaries, so he couldn’t get his possible southern supporters to really effect the primary election.

83QY9r0lzmGx9dEz4NbUUcycdOfQVByeaGLLaNL086cwxC-UUKUfD5sDTbQEWvSIvkOy381EvtoiP473aladFBMZf72Aq0XEK24h9wP8g2q7M00hsYMDlIFR9mu_W-6B_bOg3HIO

---------------------------------------------------
Sorry, couldn't resist doing this redux. I've been thinking about this since I stopped the original and I couldn't find a better time to redux. EDIT: Sorry, meant to say that Hubert Humphrey was a senator


Outspoken on civil rights wasn't really a selling point for a Democrat in 1956. Humphrey was perceived of as aggressively liberal back then--no taint of Vietnam, being LBJ's bitch, or the rest of the 1960s, just the glow of the 1948 convention speech--and primaries weren't that important. think Jesse Jackson in 88, Jerry Brown in 1992 or Howard Dean in 2004. The party bosses ultimately made the decision with the advice of the primary voters. The voters didn't decide. Out of this bunch, it would be Kefauver or Stevenson. And I don't really understand why it wouldn't still be Stevenson--the party bosses really liked him. He got nominated twice IOTL. But Kefauver was a Southern liberal who was as supportive of Civil Rights as a Senator from Tennessee could be back then. If it wasn't Stevenson for whatever reason, it would be Kefauver.
 
Outspoken on civil rights wasn't really a selling point for a Democrat in 1956. Humphrey was perceived of as aggressively liberal back then--no taint of Vietnam, being LBJ's bitch, or the rest of the 1960s, just the glow of the 1948 convention speech--and primaries weren't that important. think Jesse Jackson in 88, Jerry Brown in 1992 or Howard Dean in 2004. The party bosses ultimately made the decision with the advice of the primary voters. The voters didn't decide. Out of this bunch, it would be Kefauver or Stevenson. And I don't really understand why it wouldn't still be Stevenson--the party bosses really liked him. He got nominated twice IOTL. But Kefauver was a Southern liberal who was as supportive of Civil Rights as a Senator from Tennessee could be back then. If it wasn't Stevenson for whatever reason, it would be Kefauver.
Stevenson only gained the nomination because everybody knew he would lose to Eisenhower again in 1956. Humphrey was helped at the convention by the endorsement of House Majority leader John William McCormack. Who was quite like Humphrey with his support of Civil Rights and anti-Communism. Plus he had so easily won in the primaries it would be really difficult for Kefauver to take the nomination.
 

dcharles

Banned
Stevenson only gained the nomination because everybody knew he would lose to Eisenhower again in 1956. Humphrey was helped at the convention by the endorsement of House Majority leader John William McCormack.

Rayburn is the leader of the Democrats in the House. He and Johnson are the most powerful Democrats around and Johnson is at the near peak of his powers.

Who was quite like Humphrey with his support of Civil Rights and anti-Communism. Plus he had so easily won in the primaries it would be really difficult for Kefauver to take the nomination.

The primaries weren't very important. They just weren't--which is why so few states had them. Kefauver won 12 of 15 primaries in 1956 and was denied the nomination. He beat Truman (the friggin POTUS) in NH for God's sakes. What the party bosses wanted was what was important, and they wouldn't have wanted Humphrey. Never, no matter how many primaries he won. The Southern Democrats were far too powerful at this time. The only reason Kennedy got it in '60 was his lukewarm support of civil rights. In '56, they're even more powerful. I mean, one reason Stevenson was given the nom was bc he was less of an advocate for civil rights than was Kefauver. Less. Humphrey was more of an advocate.

I'm sorry, but a Humphrey nomination in 1956 is implausible, virtually ASB territory. It took twelve years of him cozying up to the establishment for his to be in a position to get it in '68.

Master of the Senate, by Robert Caro, has a masterful (see what I did there?) treatment of the politics of this era. I can't recommend it highly enough.
 
Rayburn is the leader of the Democrats in the House. He and Johnson are the most powerful Democrats around and Johnson is at the near peak of his powers.



The primaries weren't very important. They just weren't--which is why so few states had them. Kefauver won 12 of 15 primaries in 1956 and was denied the nomination. He beat Truman (the friggin POTUS) in NH for God's sakes. What the party bosses wanted was what was important, and they wouldn't have wanted Humphrey. Never, no matter how many primaries he won. The Southern Democrats were far too powerful at this time. The only reason Kennedy got it in '60 was his lukewarm support of civil rights. In '56, they're even more powerful. I mean, one reason Stevenson was given the nom was bc he was less of an advocate for civil rights than was Kefauver. Less. Humphrey was more of an advocate.

I'm sorry, but a Humphrey nomination in 1956 is implausible, virtually ASB territory. It took twelve years of him cozying up to the establishment for his to be in a position to get it in '68.

Master of the Senate, by Robert Caro, has a masterful (see what I did there?) treatment of the politics of this era. I can't recommend it highly enough.
Some party leaders (especially Johnson) could see that if Humphrey won and had civil rights legislation passed they would have a majority of the African-American vote and the northeastern vote, while also having southern support for a few more years. (Even in 1970 no Republican ran for governor of Alabama). If he lost they could say that they knew that Humphrey would lose to Nixon and were just trying to try something different (like Smith in '28).
 

dcharles

Banned
Some party leaders (especially Johnson) could see that if Humphrey won and had civil rights legislation passed they would have a majority of the African-American vote and the northeastern vote, while also having southern support for a few more years. (Even in 1970 no Republican ran for governor of Alabama). If he lost they could say that they knew that Humphrey would lose to Nixon and were just trying to try something different (like Smith in '28).

Ok, so first Humphrey gets the nomination because he wins the non-Southern primaries, which weren't very important to begin with. Then he gets the nomination because Johnson, who had a burning ambition to be president, would have instead wanted Humphrey, a man he barely respected, to have it instead? And Johnson, who famously said after he curbstomped the CRA and the VRA into law, that the "Democratic Party has lost the South for a generation," would instead think that Humphrey, a man of such weak will that he used to let Johnson kick him in the shins, would manage to get civil rights passed? And that it would allow the party to keep the South--even though it split the party in the very election you're referring to?

Yep.
 
Top