alternatehistory.com

Deciding not to risk heavy losses* in an attempted invasion of Britain as to not tarnish the victory against France** and suspecting an invasion of Britain is what the "jewish lapdog" Roosevelt needs to bring his country at war with Germany, Hitler decides to go south to foil this "obvious plot of the judeo-capitalist warmongrels".
How would the British respond to just having the Blitz instead? Which would target only military objectives, like airports, warships and factories.
IOTL, the BoB was considered an allied victory, what would be British moral without it? How would the forces that IOTL fought over Britain far over Egypt?
German objective would be the isolation and eventually the capture of Malta, move into Egypt and then, into the middle-east.
The belief is that with the loss of Malta, Suez (and if needed, all the way to Kuwait), the middle-east oilfields seized or destroyed, Churchill´s hold on power would be broken and Britain would as a result settle for negociations. Italian invasion of Greece would most probably be butterflied away.




* Not just of German soldiers but British civilians trying to resist the invasion, since Hitler classified Britons as aryans.

** Goebbels have his hand in that decision, after all, he wasn´t in the Minister of Propaganda for nothing.
Top