you were responding to a statement in which the original writer was referring to Muslims in general, not Arabs. And Arabs as a whole are rather less homogenous than Germans.
To quote the writer in question:
"It triggers a wave of popular anger in the Middle East that topples any regime seen as too close to Washington.The government of Qatar—gone. The government of Kuwait—gone. Above all, the government of Saudi Arabia—gone"...
He doesn't mention any non-Arab regimes.
We saw Arab Spring riots throughout most of the Arab countries so the idea of unrest and revolutions concentrated among Arab countries is not
inherently bigoted. Saying they would be inspired to do so by Osama Bin Laden in a time of peace(and for many, prosperity) might be bigoted(and impossible given the weaker presence of communication tech at the time), but it is contrary to recently demonstrated reality to claim that the idea of widespread movements among Arabs is inherently bigoted.
And their is an issue that they are effectively homogeneous and very passionate about- resentment of American and Israeli behavior in the Middle East.(Notwithstanding some gratitude from Gulf states for driving Saddam out of Kuwait and recent gratitude from Libyans for the American intervention.)
Hm? All you have to do to change your nationality is move... perhaps you means ethnicity? And a world religion will include a much more varied cast of characters than any single nationality...indeed, I don't really get the logic of your statement.
All you have to do to change your religion is stop believing in it. The followers of a religious faith have at least key tenants in common(not withstanding oddities like the supposedly Christian Mormons or supposedly Muslim Druze)... people of a given nation don't have anything in common, culturally(unless it's an overwhelmingly homogeneous one like North Korea)
Seriously, what would Bin Laden do differently, other than be a mean prick to America et al?
And how much fun would that be when the country is no longer selling oil to its former main consumers?
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-...di-arabia-monarchy-killing-of-christians.html
Aside from a shall we say "hawkish" foreign policy, they claim they'd commit genocide against Christians in Saudi Arabia. I'd also expect them to treat the Shiites worse(outright purging them would not be shocking). They'd have an economic policy of nationalization and probably hostile to consumerism. They'd do everything possible to cut off Saudi Arabia from Western culture, up to and including cutting off the internet(like Iran is trying presently). The economy would be far poorer and less stable, but also more egalitarian.
On the upside they'd stop and probably undo the Saudi's horrid commercialization of Mecca, and they'd be less racist towards immigrants of Sunni faith perhaps even treating them like humans or even as equals rather then the serf-like treatment they currently suffer.