New Royal Navy in the 70s (take 2)

You'd really want to keep helicopters (well except for rescue copter) off the carrier to maximise aircraft numbers and improve operations tempo. Is there anyway to get a seperate helicopter carrier for ASW purposes (ie HMS Hermes gets that role)?
 
Improved Victorious basically, an equivelant of the Clemenceau. Also they don't need a large aircraft like the Hawkeye for AEW there are other ways to solve that problem. I chose to modify surplus S2 trackers by fitting them with the radar from the Nimrod. It worked well enough with the AEW Sea King apart from the fact that its range was limited due to the Sea Kings max altitude so it should work OK. You could also possibly modify a small Business Jet such as the Hawker Siddeley 125. You'd need to strengthen the Airframe and landing gear, add a hook and design a folding wing. Expensive but it should work.

What about just using the Hawker Siddeley P.139B for AEW?
 
Actually I'd keep Albion & Bulwark for that, they've already been converted to Helicopter carriers. Hermes I'd try to sell or mothball. She's a good reasonably new ship but too small for Nato service as a fixed wing carrier. She might do as a replacement for the French Arromanches. It's a shame the Netherlands and Canada had opted out of the carrier business by then.

Anyway up north I'd still want some organic anti-submarine cover on the Alt-Invincibles. Thats the Northern Fleet submarines backyard. I'd want at least 6 helicopters on board. As I said earlier I'd choose Westland Lynx for the carriers to save space but I can't see the RN doing that.
 
Yes I agree that you'd want to swamp any possible ASW contact with as many helo's as possible. But helicopters and fixed wings don't really mix well on the limited deck space of a carrier. Albion & Bulwark sound like good choices. How many Sea Kings could you operate off there?
 
As Commando Carriers they had an airgroup of 16 Wessex. I suppose at a pinch you could park some Sea Kings on a container ship and have the carrier's C.I.C take operational command of them while they're in the air.
 
Last edited:
What aircraft would this 35,000t carrier have? It's too small to properly use the FAA aircraft of the 70s.
 
I read ages ago that the radar coverage of the E1B wasn't enough to enable a deck F8 interception of an incoming target, there wasn't enough time between detection and interception. As a result the USN developed the E2 which had a much greater detection distance to increase the time available for deck interceptions.

Just as a matter of interest the Sea King AEW2's radar footprint at 10,000' is a donut from about 25 miles minimum to 75 miles maximum at low level. The Sea King really only covers the low level gaps of a ship's radar, it has no high level radar coverage ability.
 
What aircraft would this 35,000t carrier have? It's too small to properly use the FAA aircraft of the 70s.

The problem here is the fighters, like the old Victorious and Hermes they can cope with Buccaneers but not Phantoms. Sea Vixans may soldier on for a while but badly need replacing and theres no money to develop a new Carrier Fighter. In my opinion the most likely result is to follow the French and opt for the F8 Crusader despite the RNs preference for twin engined designs. The eventual replacement for both aircraft is likely to be either the F/A 18 or Rafale.
 
The problem here is the fighters, like the old Victorious and Hermes they can cope with Buccaneers but not Phantoms. Sea Vixans may soldier on for a while but badly need replacing and theres no money to develop a new Carrier Fighter. In my opinion the most likely result is to follow the French and opt for the F8 Crusader despite the RNs preference for twin engined designs. The eventual replacement for both aircraft is likely to be either the F/A 18 or Rafale.

What about developing the Vickers Type 583?
71069267759648296133.jpg
 

Archibald

Banned
What about developing the Vickers Type 583?
71069267759648296133.jpg

"theres no money to develop a new Carrier Fighter" maybe ? ;)

as for the Hornet, circa 1988 France seriously considered it as an interim type between the Crusaders and Rafale. Much like the Rafale, they were too heavy; partially filled tanks and a couple of AAMs, not much.
 
There actually was an AEW Tracker - the E-1B Tracer that was the true forerunner to to the Hawkeye.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_E-1_Tracer

Much like any other Trackers it can be outfitted with turboprops for better performance.
It would be an E-1C Turbotracer !

But like the Gannet it's radar is becoming obsolete, and the UFO on its back dosn't help storage. Put an up to date radar in the belly of a rebuilt tracker and you get a quite reasonable AEW aircraft. Turboprops would definately be included in the rebuild if for no other reason than to avoid having to have Avgas on board.
 
What about developing the Vickers Type 583?
71069267759648296133.jpg

That bird looks strangely familiar, are you suggesting a Sea Tornado? The swing wings would certainly help with low speed lift to get her on and off the deck. I suppose if you build all Tornados as carrier capable it would give the RN a source of reinforcements and spread the cost.
 
That bird looks strangely familiar, are you suggesting a Sea Tornado? The swing wings would certainly help with low speed lift to get her on and off the deck. I suppose if you build all Tornados as carrier capable it would give the RN a source of reinforcements and spread the cost.

The Vickers Type 583 would become part of the Anglo-French Variable Geometry project that ultimately evolved into the Panavia Tornado.
 
I slapped up a quick TL ages ago within a big thread about wanking Britain's military within OTL budgets. I might drag it out and dust it off, and add in a few things I've learned since.
 
But like the Gannet it's radar is becoming obsolete, and the UFO on its back dosn't help storage. Put an up to date radar in the belly of a rebuilt tracker and you get a quite reasonable AEW aircraft. Turboprops would definately be included in the rebuild if for no other reason than to avoid having to have Avgas on board.

The radar in the Tracer is not obsolete, it just fails to meet the requirements that the USN had set out in their tactical concept. The radar itself is considerably better than the AN/APS20 in the Gannet AEW3, especially tracking low level targets through clutter.
 
Top