Hi All,
I am interested in the boards opinion on the plausibility and possible effects of a neutral Italy in WW1. I understand that both sides were heavily lobbying Italy, but the majority of the population and even the parliament were against intervening. If we take the POD as King Emmanuel refusing to entertain any intervention on either side then I think that will be enough to prevent the Treaty of London. It was conducted in secret and I believe would not have gone ahead without the King's support. Perhaps his motive may be his refusal to compound their already dishonourable stance of not backing their alliance partners with outright betraying them. Although he could argue it was only a defensive alliance, by declaring war on his former allies he loses the moral high ground.
So if we accept the premise what happens in the greater war? Will Italy seek to avenge its defeat at Adowa and invade Abysinnia during the war? Could they win? The powers (Britain-France) capable of intervening would also be loathe to provoke a potential enemy. If they can win, how does this affect the fascist movement post war?
Kind regards