Deleted member 1487
However, even if there were very little tank development in the following years, the general motorization of societies (esp. in America) would still lead all armies to use more and more motor vehicles for their logistics, transport...probably also self-propelled artillery and an emphasis on pioneers and engineers.
Edit: I didn't quote the section where you talked about tanks. Otherwise you're probably right.
The idea just forming in my head is a doctrine which promises victory to those able to concentrate their troops and mobile artillery fastest to achieve key breakthrough and who are able to repair infrastructure fast enough in order to keep the engines running. Air Forces will, as in OTL, play still a key role in all plans for future wars.
I wouldn't say that. Motorization was desired pre-war, which the war only reinforced. Tanks were also recognized to be a crucial new weapon, even by the Germans, but all sides recognized that engines and drive trains were not developed enough; for the Germans it wasn't enough to bother building them in numbers during the war, but post war, after the inevitable cuts to balance the budget, will see focus on developing the concept, especially because it requires fewer soldiers on the battlefield, which means fewer casualties in future wars.