Naziwank

It's not important that they're under the Nazis' thumb, its important that they have gone all isolationist and out of the picture. I am trying find a reason of why Canada doesn't matter.

I still would like to know if having a puppet UK, where they put Edward VIII back on the throne, but he's the Nazi's puppet; or the US changes the regime to be another US puppet like the rest of the hemisphere sounds less ASB; as a way to 'deal' with Canada.
 
To echo what's already been said:

There is no bloody way that Canada would EVER acknowledge ANY sort of Nazi overlordship, no matter how indirect. Any Governor-General sent by any sort of British collaborationist government would probably be arrested upon arriving on Canadian soil (unless this evil sod somehow came to power, which itself is ASB).

The USA certainly wouldn't agree to any kind of German presence in the Western Hemisphere, especially across its northern border...
 
There is no bloody way that Canada would ever acknowledge any sort of Nazi overlordship, no matter how indirect. Any Governor-General sent by any sort of British collaborationist government would probably be arrested upon arriving on Canadian soil.

The USA certainly wouldn't agree to any kind of German presence in the Western Hemisphere, especially across its northern border...

Okay. I'm trying to get Canada not to matter. That is my goal. They're not really under the Nazis in my scenario anyway, the guy who says 'approved' to everything parliament does was sent by different people is really all that's different.

The US is isolationist, is it unreasonable to say that Canada becomes a parliamentary republic (meaning that the only thing different is there's a president instead of a governor general), and follows the same lines of the US (not get involved in the German-Commonwealth Cold War), stick to its own hemisphere? Canada and the US agreed to a separate peace with Germany?
 
Last edited:
Okay. I'm trying to get Canada not to matter. That is my goal. They're not really under the Nazis in my scenario anyway, the guy who says 'approved' to everything parliament does was sent by different people is really all that's different.

The US is isolationist, is it unreasonable to say that Canada becomes a parliamentary republic (meaning that the only thing different is there's a president instead of a governor general), and follows the same lines of the US (not get involved in the German-Commonwealth Cold War)?

Well, if the US is isolationist and the New Empire is autocratic, yes, I'd see it likely that they go isolationist. Can't really take on the Nazis by themselves. Of course, given the events abroad, the US is likely to arm itself to the teeth, and is only likely to be isolationist to the extent of "We don't intend to get involved in the old world, touching you is likely to give us cooties, but lay one finger on the Americas, North or South, and we will tear your effing arms off."


Bruce
 
Well, if the US is isolationist and the New Empire is autocratic, yes, I'd see it likely that they go isolationist. Can't really take on the Nazis by themselves. Of course, given the events abroad, the US is likely to arm itself to the teeth, and is only likely to be isolationist to the extent of "We don't intend to get involved in the old world, touching you is likely to give us cooties, but lay one finger on the Americas, North or South, and we will tear your effing arms off."


Bruce

So perhaps this: the US and Canada agree to a separate peace then British government-in-exile and Commonwealth. Canada becomes a republic and is out of the picture. US and the Canadian Republic partner to essentially maintain a cadre of puppets running Latin America, thus other then the Caribbean and the corporate state in Guyana, we have taken care of America.

BTW, New Empire has to be autocratic, to maintain power (think South Africa, for the exact same reason), with the hope of one day recovering Britain.
 
Top