I don't think there was a unique way to treat native for one European country : New France colonization was much more peaceful compared to the rest of colonial North America (in no small part due to the quite reduced French settlement outside St. Lawrence's valley, but also from royal politics on the matter) and definitely were natives were considered best (up to virtual integration) but Lower Louisiana was much more managed on Caribbean lines and
Natchez Revolt's causes and consequences were vastly different from what happened in Canada.
And of course, both had little to do directly with French colonisations practices in Africa and Asia (which, themselves, differed greatly on several matters, as well than between French Algeria, Senegal or Madagscar) which could be either particularly brutal (I'm thinking to late colonial Camerun especially, altough wars in Algeria were too) without going full genocide as with Hereros, or relatively smooth transition from pre-colonial cadres.
Long story short, I think it would be maybe better to focus on one macro-region (or continent) and on one specific period, because it was much more multi-faceted than that.