native treatment

I don't think there was a unique way to treat native for one European country : New France colonization was much more peaceful compared to the rest of colonial North America (in no small part due to the quite reduced French settlement outside St. Lawrence's valley, but also from royal politics on the matter) and definitely were natives were considered best (up to virtual integration) but Lower Louisiana was much more managed on Caribbean lines and Natchez Revolt's causes and consequences were vastly different from what happened in Canada.
And of course, both had little to do directly with French colonisations practices in Africa and Asia (which, themselves, differed greatly on several matters, as well than between French Algeria, Senegal or Madagscar) which could be either particularly brutal (I'm thinking to late colonial Camerun especially, altough wars in Algeria were too) without going full genocide as with Hereros, or relatively smooth transition from pre-colonial cadres.

Long story short, I think it would be maybe better to focus on one macro-region (or continent) and on one specific period, because it was much more multi-faceted than that.
 
Who treated the natives better of all the european countries that colonized?

Well define "better" least Genocidical?, less exploitative? less Rape? less Cultural destruction? less Slaves? Because depending on what metric you want to use the answer Change, Portugal was the least genocidal of the bunch(not by much mind you), but they started the slave trade in america, The french were pretty good in Mainland america, but horrible in the Caribbean and Africa, England was Genocidical to the point is not Funny, the Spanish were more exploitative and with tendencies to rape or at least maintain harems of non-European women,

Maybe the Danish?, then again the Colonial Danish empire don´t amount to much.
 
Top