Could Napoleon attempt to subvert its most hated rival by inciting revolt not just in Ireland, but Scotland as well? Also at this point are there any radical movements in England that may be fed guns as well?
Last edited:
What if Bonnie Prince Charlie had had a legitimate child with Louise of Stolberg-Gedern?
3. Make an alliance with the House of Savoy, the legitimate successors to the Stuarts. This could work well if Napoléon uses the Jacobites as a smokescreen to invade Ireland (play up Nationalism and Catholicism against the British, like the 1797 attempt?).
Charles Edward Augustus Maximilian Stuart, Baron Korff, Count Roehenstart (c. May 1784 – 28 October 1854) was the natural son of Prince Ferdinand of Rohan (1738–1813), Roman Catholic Archbishop of Cambrai, by Charlotte Stuart, Duchess of Albany, herself the natural but legitimised daughter of Charles Edward Stuart, "The Young Pretender" or "Bonnie Prince Charlie".[1] Roehenstart was later a passive Jacobite claimant to the British throne.
The name of "Roehenstart" given to him in infancy combined the names of both of his parents, Rohan and Stuart, while failing to proclaim their identity, which at the time would have been a cause for scandal.[1]
In order to lay a claim of his own to the British throne, Roehenstart maintained consistently that his grandfather Prince Charles Edward had married his grandmother, Clementina Walkinshaw, and also that his mother the Duchess of Albany had married a Swedish nobleman named Maximilian Roehenstart. The first is unlikely, although not an impossibility, but it lacks evidence; nothing has come to light to support the second claim, and there is no Swedish noble family named Roehenstart. On the contrary, Charlotte's relationship with Rohan is well evidenced.[12]
Although he laid claim to the Jacobite succession, Roehenstart made no practical attempt to regain the throne of his Stuart ancestors. He did seek to maintain links with leading Scots and at the time of his death was returning from a visit to the Duke of Atholl at Blair Castle in Perthshire.[13]
Uh no. He didn't. It's a common myth. The so-called "jewels" were a Garter Collar and the Great Georgehe left the crown jewels that his grandfather James II had taken to George III - tacitly designating George as the "true prince".
They were not willed to George IV, since by the time of the Congress of Vienna, George asked the papal secretary, Consalvi, about the effects of the "late called duke of York" and was told that he [Consalvi] had no idea beyond that they had already been "disposed of to the legal heirs", and it was only in October 1815 that Consalvi was able to inform the foreign office of the whereabouts of the "effects".which had been given (by Cardinal York?) as security for debts.
Ergo, the "myth" that Henry had willed the collar or any of the jewels came from George IV's own lips. And since that guy also made a comment about "when I was at Waterloo" to the duke of Wellington (who gruffly replied "I have often heard your Majesty say so"), I think Georgie-Porgie isn't the most reliable source.Although it is not known when the Prince received the collar and George they were certainly in his possession by 1825 when he wore the George at a Waterloo dinner at Carlton House: ‘He [George IV] ... acquainted his guests that the George which he reserved for his own wearing was the same which had been worn by Charles I, Charles II, and James II and was bequeathed by Henry IX, Cardinal of York to the present king’.
Napoléon sort of believed that BPC and Louise of Stolberg had had a son. He even summoned Louise to Paris to confirm or deny the rumour. When Louise unfortunately denied that there had been a son (or child of any sort), Napoléon shut her and her lover, Alfieri, up for a time; then sent them back to Florence and had his secret police watch their palazzo.Could Napoleon attempt to subvert its most hated rival by inciting revolt not just in Ireland, but Scotland as well? Also at this point are there any radical movements in England that may be fed guns as well?
Wolfe in Ireland?Were there any radical movements in the UK that they could back?
At the time of her death, she was considering a match with one of the FitzJames (ICR if it was the duque de Liria, who was also nephew of Louise of Stolberg) or the duc de Fitz-James.2. Charlotte, Duchess of Albany marries legitimately and has legitimate children.
The cardinal-duke was panicked enough that he had Clementina Walkinshaw sign three different declarations that there had been no marriage between she and BPC at any point. (Think James III also made the pension he'd extended to her in the 1750s conditional on her swearing this).after the Cardinal-Duke (which seemed to be what Charles III wanted when he legitimized Charlotte and hinted at giving her succession rights after uncle).
He did?Charles III had a plan to marry her to Prince Frederick Adolf, Duke of Östergötland
Napoléon sort of believed that BPC and Louise of Stolberg had had a son. He even summoned Louise to Paris to confirm or deny the rumour. When Louise unfortunately denied that there had been a son (or child of any sort), Napoléon shut her and her lover, Alfieri, up for a time; then sent them back to Florence and had his secret police watch their palazzo.
Wolfe in Ireland?
Napoleon and the partisans of legitimacy and the divine right of kings would make for strange bedfellows.