No because équinoxiale refer to equinox, if you follow the same logic, it would be France ArctiqueDepends on the region, either France Antarctique (southeast) or France équinoxiale (northeast)
No because équinoxiale refer to equinox, if you follow the same logic, it would be France ArctiqueDepends on the region, either France Antarctique (southeast) or France équinoxiale (northeast)
Actually both did exist. France antartique existed in the 16th century while France équinoxiale (later Guyana) was colonised in the 17th century.No because équinoxiale refer to equinox, if you follow the same logic, it would be France Arctique
équinoxiale it's a strange name !Actually both did exist. France antartique existed in the 16th century while France équinoxiale (later Guyana) was colonised in the 17th century.
You're right. I was very surprised when I first read about it tbh. Don't know why they didn't find another name.équinoxiale it's a strange name !
équinoxiale it's a strange name !
You're right. I was very surprised when I first read about it tbh. Don't know why they didn't find another name.
Well, you can consider OTL Brazilian Northeast (as France équinoxiale).If the Huguenot colonies were successful, it would be called France Antactique. I'm not sure what it would be called if it were a Catholic French colony.
Actually both did exist. France antartique existed in the 16th century while France équinoxiale (later Guyana) was colonised in the 17th century.
I don't think so. The settlement of Rio de Janeiro was founded as a response to the perfidious French incursions, and the godless settlement they had founded on the other side. And it's clear that God did not want Brazil to have a lame-ass name like "Antarctique" which is why He was on Portugal's side during the fracas.It's the first name of Rio de Janeiro btw