Here are some myths I believed about nuclear war I used to believe in. Anyone can share their previous myths:
1. That fallout would be long-lasting and severe after a nuclear exchange.
I once believed legit that fallout after a nuclear war would really be so intense and would last long, but considering the 7-10 rule and the fact that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were eventually habitable, I don't see how the idea that radiation would render much of the world and former urban cores uninhabitable by radiation as seen in Hollywood films and other post-apocalyptic media about nuclear wars.
https://www.quora.com/Why-were-Naga...ot-after-their-meltdowns-Whats-the-difference
Granted, cancer rates would certainly go up. And the ozone layer would get reduced and it's bad, but not world-ending.
2. Cities would get screwed.
I don't trust some nations but I do trust the US + NATO and Russia, nations with the greatest abilities to conduct total nuclear exchanges, would follow their doctrines, be rational, and really avoid nuking cities in a nuclear war, going instead for hard military facilities and nuke facilities such as ICBM sites (they have an efficiency incentive to do so):
https://www.quora.com/How-long-would-it-take-humanity-to-recover-from-an-all-out-nuclear-war
https://www.businessinsider.com/likely-us-nuclear-targets-2017-5
1. That fallout would be long-lasting and severe after a nuclear exchange.
I once believed legit that fallout after a nuclear war would really be so intense and would last long, but considering the 7-10 rule and the fact that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were eventually habitable, I don't see how the idea that radiation would render much of the world and former urban cores uninhabitable by radiation as seen in Hollywood films and other post-apocalyptic media about nuclear wars.
https://www.quora.com/Why-were-Naga...ot-after-their-meltdowns-Whats-the-difference
Granted, cancer rates would certainly go up. And the ozone layer would get reduced and it's bad, but not world-ending.
2. Cities would get screwed.
I don't trust some nations but I do trust the US + NATO and Russia, nations with the greatest abilities to conduct total nuclear exchanges, would follow their doctrines, be rational, and really avoid nuking cities in a nuclear war, going instead for hard military facilities and nuke facilities such as ICBM sites (they have an efficiency incentive to do so):
https://www.quora.com/How-long-would-it-take-humanity-to-recover-from-an-all-out-nuclear-war
https://www.businessinsider.com/likely-us-nuclear-targets-2017-5