"Just Lose It" is a really bizarre thing. It's really mind-boggling that he just came off two of the best albums of the decade with...
that. Kind of a mixture of

and

to be honest. And maybe a bit of

as well.
Still, I guess some folks enjoy it.
Anyway, here's a few I've been thinking about:
1. Freddie Mercury does not contract HIV and consequently does not die in 1991. Would
Innuendo still have been such an effective musical statement? What woud it have meant for the public profile of AIDS? He was among the first internationally recognised celebrities to die as a consequence of the disease. Would he have held true to his earlier suggestion that he might retire from active performance in favour of songwriting and production if he felt he was getting too old to go out on stage?
2. What would it have meant (if anything) if Iron Butterfly had played at Woodstock? They were one of several artists included in the promotional materials that ended up not performing, but apparently they were very close; their manager demanded special treatment and the organisers just never got back to him; I'm pretty sure Doug Ingle has suggested that the extra publicity might have kept the band (whose
In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida album was actually the best-seller for their company until the first Led Zeppelin record came out) together for longer.
3. Similarly, what if Woodstock 99 hadn't ended up as a bit of a fiasco? Would there have been further festivals? Could it have grown to match Glastonbury as an international event in popular music?
4. Finally, in 1970, Phil Collins had scheduled two auditions for two different bands on the same day. The earlier one was Genesis, and when he scored that gig he cancelled the second one. The other band looking for a drummer was Yes. What if Phil Collins had failed to secure the Genesis job (for whatever reason) and ended up drumming for Yes instead?