Garrison

Donor
So no Gaddafi and Nasser? And the Iraqi, Egyptian,and Libyan monarchies stay in power?
Gaddafi may well have been butterflied away as his home time was on the frontlines in Libya earlier ITTL. As for the monarchies surviving, the issues that led to their demise may still apply, or with enough foreign support maybe they could survive, TBD.
 
Gaddafi may well have been butterflied away as his home time was on the frontlines in Libya earlier ITTL. As for the monarchies surviving, the issues that led to their demise may still apply, or with enough foreign support maybe they could survive, TBD.
I think the structural factors that lead to their OTL demise are still, more or less, in place. But the butterflies have flapped hard enough that it's unlikely that their demises and replacements will be near parallels of OTL, IMO.

As an example, I just don't see the Suez Crisis happening as OTL. Definitely not in 1956, at least. I think that both the UK and France will end TTL's WW2 better off in economy, prestige and, perhaps most importantly, self confidence.

I see France's post WW2 willingness to get stuck and stay stuck in the quagmires of Indochina and Algeria as being driven by their loss of prestige and, essentially, their insecurity. The UK/France, with more prestige and self-confidence will, IMO, be more able to 'psychologically' survive confronting decolonisation. And will thus be far better primed to shape decolonisation to their liking.
 
I think the structural factors that lead to their OTL demise are still, more or less, in place. But the butterflies have flapped hard enough that it's unlikely that their demises and replacements will be near parallels of OTL, IMO.

As an example, I just don't see the Suez Crisis happening as OTL. Definitely not in 1956, at least. I think that both the UK and France will end TTL's WW2 better off in economy, prestige and, perhaps most importantly, self confidence.

I see France's post WW2 willingness to get stuck and stay stuck in the quagmires of Indochina and Algeria as being driven by their loss of prestige and, essentially, their insecurity. The UK/France, with more prestige and self-confidence will, IMO, be more able to 'psychologically' survive confronting decolonisation. And will thus be far better primed to shape decolonisation to their liking.
Indochina, yes.
ITTL there might well be an earlier compromise giving internal autonomy to Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, but customs, monetary, military and diplomatical union with France.

Algeria is another matter.
Even a slightly better off France will still cling hard on it, because it was (legally and culturally) seen as an integral part of France, and there was a big European (colonist) population.
 

Garrison

Donor
Indochina, yes.
ITTL there might well be an earlier compromise giving internal autonomy to Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, but customs, monetary, military and diplomatical union with France.

Algeria is another matter.
Even a slightly better off France will still cling hard on it, because it was (legally and culturally) seen as an integral part of France, and there was a big European (colonist) population.
A lot is going to come down to just how things shake out in South East Asia, lest we forget the French aren't getting back into Indochina without British support.
 
May -September 1943 – My Enemies Enemy -Nationalism and Resistance - Part II – The Allies

Garrison

Donor
May -September 1943 – My Enemies Enemy -Nationalism and Resistance - Part II – The Allies

For the British recruiting manpower from their empire was a huge boon to their ability to field large scale armies, by the 1940s though doing so had become increasingly politically complicated as the Dominions and the Empire could no longer be expected to simply follow diktats from London. The White Dominions expected their voices to be heard when it came to the deployment of their troops and in the case of India recruiting and war production became tangled up in the questions over the future of the country, made worse by the fact that Churchill had something of a blind spot when it came to the status of India. Where Churchill had been willing to go so far as to offer an Anglo-French Union and even contemplated compromising on the sovereignty of Northern Ireland to gain Irish support during the war, though with little success in either case. he firmly believed that India was still the ‘jewel in the crown’ of the Empire and should remain so, though many others in the cabinet and the Foreign Office took a renegotiation of India’s position in the empire as inevitable, with the alternative being an unseemly withdrawal in less than favourable circumstances [1]. This predicament had the potential to create serious issues for the British, or at least more serious than they actually faced during the war. They were spared largely by the ineptitude of the Japanese in establishing relations with Indian Nationalists.

Regardless of Churchill’s reluctance others saw an opportune moment to secure a future roadmap towards Dominion status for India, and they had the increasing need for Indian troops to serve in South East Asia to use as a counter to Churchill’s views. The build-up for D-Day meant that British, and Canadian for that matter, forces had to be prioritized for the European theatre. Australia and New Zealand were reaching the limits of what they could provide and becoming increasingly sensitive about losses. With operations in the DEI and plans for a drive north to liberate Thailand and Indochina to provide towards Hong Kong and Japan itself the only credible source of troops was India and the leaders of the Nationalist movement were no less determined than the politicians in Canberra or Ottawa that the sacrifices of those troops should be honoured with a change in the political relationship of their country to the empire and a refusal to budge on Dominion status and autonomy simply played into the hands of those who were determined that nothing less than full independence was acceptable, though these parties had their own issues to deal with. Arguments that the Empire was a tottering edifice, and the British could not hold onto it had been left looking more than a little hyperbolic after British victories since December 1941, however those voices would soon reassert themselves if the British tried to cling to the status quo. Whatever Churchill’s instincts he could sometimes be argued out of some of his worst ideas and in 1943 he finally conceded that the demands of winning the war outweighed his romantic notions of the British Empire’s past. There could be no question of a wholesale revision of India’s status while the war raged on, but a process was put in place that shaped post-war planning and gained a momentum that Churchill could not stop [2].

The territories conquered by Japan and Germany offered fertile ground for raising resistance forces, though such work was never less than perilous for the British Special Operations Executive (SOE) and the American Office of Strategic Services (OSS), with their agents operating in hostile territory and facing the constant risk of betrayal if they sought to recruit the wrong people to the cause. They also had to face the problem that when operating in South East Asia India was not the only place where nationalism was a powerful driving force, many of those who wanted to see the back of the Japanese had little enthusiasm for the return of their previous colonial masters, and this created some friction between the Free French and the British over organizing resistance in Indochina, though as with India there were more pragmatic elements in the French leadership who saw that antagonizing the nationalists was simply storing up trouble for the future and if they did not get the nationalists onside then that might mean greater French losses when it came to driving the Japanese out of Indochina.

The Dutch were even less enthusiastic than the French about stirring up nationalist sentiments in their colonial territories. They were in a far weaker position than the French, who in 1943 had at least been able to reclaim territories such as Algeria and Madagascar, but the Dutch remained as little more than a government in exile until Java and Borneo were cleared and they were determined to reassert their control as a matter of national prestige rather than of pragmatic interest and their actions in the DEI after reclaiming control did nothing to strengthen relations with London and Washington [3].

Even in the colonies that had not been occupied by the Japanese and had instead chosen to side with the Vichy regime there were issues with ‘restless natives’ who saw the fall of France as an opportunity and the changes in administration as the colonies hastily declared for Free France after Case Anton did nothing to change their opinions. In many of these colonies far from the frontlines of the war there wasn’t much in the way of outside support, meaning that these nationalists could achieve little while the war raged but this did little to quench their aspirations and the example of other colonial possessions served as a source of inspiration. Some of these colonies looked to the USA for support and encouragement, after all the USA was no fan of the colonial empires. Pragmatism would win out for the USA in the post-war period, where stability and keeping Communism at bay overrode considerations of self-determination and democracy [4].

Thailand having been an independent nation before the Japanese invasion provoked far less debate and indeed the Thai resistance movement was arguably the most effective in the whole of South East Asia. The Thais had put up fierce, albeit brief, resistance to the Japanese invasion of their homeland. There had been some resentment that the British had not come to their aid in 1941, but by 1943 this had evaporated as the British hosted a Thai government in exile based in Singapore. The British even went so far as to recruit Free Thai regiments. These soldiers were rarely used in front line service, they were deployed behind the lines alongside Wingate’s Chindits who by this time were well supported by the RAF, providing resupply and even evacuating wounded and sick troops. The attachment of Thai soldiers meant the Chindits were able to create a network of contacts, providing a source of supplies and intelligence, and a conduit for weapons flowing in the opposite direction to arm Thai resistance groups [5].

Arms and equipment were also funnelled directly through Slim’s force, still encamped on the western edge of Thailand and they made the occasional raid helping to tie down Japanese troops and encourage the resistance groups. Much of the equipment flowing through this pipeline had been diverted from the those intended to travel along the Burma Road to the Kuomintang in China. The senior British Generals had been deeply unimpressed with the performance of the Kuomintang and had noticed that Lend-Lease equipment intended for the Chinese Nationalists had repeatedly found its way into Japanese hands or be used to prosecute the bitter rivalry between Nationalists and Communists. Since China appeared to be a bottomless pit into which vast quantities of arms and equipment disappeared, the British had no qualms about making sure some of it ended up where it would do some good. This ultimately became another source of friction between the British and the Americans, though the latter could hardly argue against the results. The Thai resistance was also helped by the Japanese attempting to move units from Thailand to Borneo, and having to run the gauntlet of Allied air and naval attacks meant that a large proportion of these troops ended serving in neither theatre and merely weakened the overall Japanese position [6].

The question of supporting resistance movements might have been expected to be less fraught in mainland France and the other occupied nations of Europe as opposed to their distant colonies, but here a different dilemma arose in that many of the most effective resistance movements that sprang up were Communist, who may have been willing to accept aid from the Western Allies to fight the Nazis but aimed at continuing with their revolutionary goals after the war was over. The Allies tried to counterbalance this by helping to build up resistance forces that were ideologically opposed the Communists, however in France this meant an antipathy between different resistance networks that rivalled that they felt towards the Nazis. Sometimes they went so far as to attack and betray one another, creating considerable headaches for the Allies [7].

Italy created even greater problems for the Allies. To begin with Italy was still technically an Axis nation in 1943 and some of those who chose to oppose the German intervention were still ardent supporters of Mussolini’s brand of fascism, and then there were the outright bandits and organized crime families who attacked the Italian forces loyal to the Ciano government and robbed the Germans at every opportunity. On top of all this there was the discrete contacts between the Allies and elements in the Italian government looking for an exit strategy and there was a real possibility they might turn on the Germans if the opportunity arose. What constituted such an opportunity was one of the sticking points in these contacts, the Allies after all had no intention of sharing any details of their actual plans for 1943, leaving their Italian contacts thinking that a landing in mainland Italy was still on the card. This encouraged the Italian authorities to turn a blind eye to certain sabotage activities directed towards the Wehrmacht forces, while some were also being bribed to allow Mafiosi to operate unimpeded, which would prove every bit as much of a problem after the war as the threat of communist revolution [8].

The threat that loomed over all resistance groups was that of retaliation by the occupying powers. Neither Imperial Japan nor Nazi Germany had any qualms about making innocent civilians pay for acts of sabotage and attacks on their troops, or even in the aftermath of setbacks that had nothing to do with resistance actions. These punishments ranged from simply rounding up fresh tranches of slave labour to mass murder, with the village of Lidice in Czechoslovakia being the most infamous example of German retaliation. The entire population of the village was executed, and the village razed to the ground in retaliation for the death of Reinhard Heydrich, killed when an SOE agent lobbed a bomb into his car. The retaliation for Heydrich’s death discouraged the Allies from other assassination attempts, as well as the consideration that the removal of certain elements of the Nazi leadership might improve the performance of the Wehrmacht [9].

The atrocities committed in response to other acts of resistance may have been less grandiose than the attempt to wipe Lidice from existence, which failed in the end as other places adopted the name to ensure it was always remembered, but they were no less savage. This placed a terrible burden on those who chose to resist and posed a tremendous moral dilemma, were attempts to undermine the occupying power justifiable in the face of such brutality, if the alternative of doing nothing invited the continuation of occupation and oppression? By and large the resistance movements chose to believe the price had to be paid to see the back of the Axis, and also the necessity of working with the Allies, regardless of differing agendas [10].

[1] Or OTL as we call it.

[2] So yes, a different trajectory for India and South East Asia if the more realistic elements in London have their way.

[3] As discussed in the TL the French will feel a little stronger and a little less intransigent when it comes to the future of their colonies, the Dutch much less so.

[4] American politics will be different as the are going to be some butterflies owing to the timing of the end of the war in Europe.

[5] The battle for Thailand will be along shortly.

[6] Yeah China is still a quagmire, a different quagmire, but still.

[7] An example of something that is theoretically simple but incredibly difficult.

[8] And the Mob are still the beneficiaries of Allied expediency. On the bright side The Godfather and the Sopranos probably still exist.

[9] Heydrich dies outright here during the attack.

[10] The dilemma of the resistance groups everywhere, and one without a good answer.
 

Errolwi

Monthly Donor
The White Dominions expected their voices to be heard when it came to the deployment of their troops
Expected? More like demanded and were granted a veto on deployments, exercised OTL eg in the case of Blamey and Tobruk.

Keep up the good work.
 

Garrison

Donor
Speaking of which I wonder how the 42' midterms went.
About the same as OTL, the economic and political landscape in the USA hasn't had time to make real changes in 1942, even though we know they did a bit better than OTL.
Expected? More like demanded and were granted a veto on deployments, exercised OTL eg in the case of Blamey and Tobruk.

Keep up the good work.
Thank you and they are being just as strident here, which ironically strengthens the hand of the Indians.
 
28th June – 4th August 1943 – Dutch East Indies - Borneo – The Drive to Samarinda

Garrison

Donor
28th June – 4th August 1943 – Dutch East Indies - Borneo – The Drive to Samarinda

After the Kamikaze attacks and the engagement, it took until the 11th of June to secure British Borneo, largely because of small pockets of Japanese troops that had to be destroyed one by one and the temporary disruption to the movement of supply convoys owing to the fear that they might come under attack from elements of the IJN surface force that had survived the fighting off Borneo. With Sarawak secured the Allied forces called a temporary halt to operations to regroup and reinforce before striking into the heart of Borneo, where their intelligence sources indicated a much harder battle ahead [1].

There were even suggestions in some quarters, notably in Washington that in the aftermath of the latest defeat inflicted on the IJN that the remaining Japanese troops on Borneo could be left to ‘wither on the vine’ cut off from support and resupply they could simply be worn down by a mixture of air attacks and starvation. These suggestions received short shrift from the Dutch government in exile and most of the military professionals who been forced to deal with the fanatical determination shown by so many Japanese troops. What amounted to a siege strategy would take many months to complete and leave the Allied forces exposed to Japanese counterattacks. However weak the IJN might seem in June 1943 and however beleaguered the defenders of Borneo were the deployment of Kamikaze tactics meant that they could still inflict disproportion damage on the Allied forces before they finally collapsed. There was also the matter of the fate of the civilian population that remained in the hands of the Japanese, a particular concern for the Dutch who expected to continue ruling over the territory when the war ended. This was a legitimate worry and horror stories about the Japanese treatment of the locals on both Java and Borneo could have filled several volumes. Simply leaving the civilians to suffer in a siege would inevitably create antipathy towards the Allies and the last thing they wanted was the guerrillas they had encouraged, again over Dutch objections, to turn on them. In light of all these arguments the second stage of Operation Gawain would go ahead, with a planned date of 26th June 1943 [2].

While the ground troops were regrouping there was no respite for the Allied air forces. Airfields in Sarawak and on Java were rapidly improved to be able to handle medium bombers and make them more resistance to bad weather. This allowed for air attack to be staged into southern Borneo and the Japanese faced attacks from almost every model of fighter bomber, light bomber, and medium bomber in the Allied arsenal in 1943. There have even been accounts of the experimental use of Napalm in Borneo, even though official records state that the first actual combat deployments of napalm were in Europe after D-Day. Even if the Japanese were spared the destruction associated with that incendiary, they were subjected to daily air attacks, interrupted only by those days when the weather prevented the bombers flying [3].

General Kawaguchi could do nothing to halt these attacks. He had a handful of aircraft available after the strikes on the landing forces and those surviving aircraft had been a priority for Allied fighter-bomber sweeps, with most destroyed on the ground, though a few achieved a more ‘honourable’ death, attacking bombers and their fighter escort even though they were hopelessly outnumbered. The determination of the remaining Japanese pilots allowed them to score some successes despite the odds, however by the time the ground troops were ready to advance once more the only aircraft in the skies over Borneo belonged to the Allies. Kawaguchi was thus completely dependent on the strength of his defensive fortifications to resist the renewed attacks, though whatever he might have told his subordinates he had little confidence in their ability to hold off a major offensive. His plan called for a layered defence, with his units progressively falling back and bleeding the Allied troops every step of the way. This was a sound strategy given his limited resources, but Kawaguchi faced a fundamental problem in that this sort of co-ordinated retreat went against the doctrine that had been drummed into his troops, retreat was seen as almost as dishonourable as surrender to some officers and all too often during the Allied advance Kawaguchi’s frontline troops failed to disengage according to the battleplan, leaving companies and even entire regiments cut off and overrun [4].

The battle opened on the 28th of June, delayed for two days by a series of small spoiling attacks mounted by the Japanese, which annoyed Kawaguchi as much as it did the Allies since it went against his orders to hold on the defensive. He had allowed his local commanders some latitude in responding to enemy action and several chose to respond to Allied patrols by attacking some of the jumping off points for the Allied offensive. The delay this caused was outweighed by the losses to the Japanese and the consumption of ammunition and supplies that were already stretched thin. The main axis of advance was to be a sweep through the west and into central Borneo, aiming for the Mahakam River and the city of Samarinda on the southern coast of the island, securing the port there to shorten the supply lines of the advancing troops. I Provisional Corps was in the more central position, now reinforced with elements of the 5th Indian Infantry Division, which had the distinction of having fought all three Axis powers after having served in North Africa in 1941. In due course 5th Indian took over completely from 7th Australian Division, which became a recurrent theme in the latter half of 1943 as Australian, New Zealand, and Canadian divisions in the Pacific theatre were increasingly withdrawn, either for refit or moved to the European theatre of operations. The British Empire forces in South East Asia took on an increasingly Anglo-Indian flavour, tying India to the Empire or strengthening the hand of the Nationalists depending on whether you were talking to politicians in Whitehall or New Delhi. Elements of 8th Indian Infantry would also join I Provisional Corps during the latter stages of the battle [5].

US I Corps would advance further to the west, mopping up the smaller coastal towns, again improving supply lines, and hopefully punching through the Japanese lines and making a swift advance towards Samarinda, taking advantage of I Provisional Corps pinning down the enemy to their east and cutting the lines of communications for the elements of the Japanese forces facing the Americans. These defending forces were primarily composed of a badly understrength 35th Infantry Brigade, operating in terrain that didn’t afford much in the way of high ground or other solid natural defensive positions they could exploit. I Corps would need all the advantages it could get as unlike I Provisional Corps it had not been given a high priority for reinforcements, something that caused a great deal of bitterness among those who served in I Corps during the Borneo campaign. This decision had been taken because those in Washington who had been incessantly lobbying for an assault on the Philippines were finally getting their way. It would take months to fully prepare for the assault, it was however already being given the highest priority for men and equipment in the Pacific, which in addition to creating in the ranks of the US forces did nothing to improve relations between the British and the Americans [6].

When the initial Allied attacks went in on the 28th they made steady if unspectacular progress as they dislodged the Japanese from their forward positions. This was assisted by the fact that in this initial phase of the battle most IJA units did follow Kawaguchi’s orders to fall back while slowing down the Allies and inflicting the maximum possible casualties. The Allies however had also learned to be cautious when dealing with Japanese soldiers and they increasingly relied on armour and artillery to break down the defences to conserve the infantry as well as using infiltration tactics to work around the flanks and rear of those defensive positions that could not be crushed by superior fire power. By July 7th the advance began to slow and become more ragged as they encountered the main line of Japanese resistance and Kawaguchi committed what reserves he had available. Jungle terrain made it harder for the supporting aircraft to spot targets on the ground and attack them while at the same time slowing the advance of the artillery units, meaning that the infantry was sometimes left with little choice but to directly assault positions that couldn’t be bypassed, and these assaults inevitably proved costly even as they succeeded in unhinging the Japanese defensive positions.

Common sense prevailed and a brief halt was called on the 12th of July to allow reserves and supplies to catch up before a series of smaller actions were launched to eliminate several strongpoints that still threatened the cohesion of the advance. Despite some anxiety that the halt would allow the Japanese to regroup when the attack resumed on the 17th of July it began to make rapid progress. The Japanese were running short on ammunition and supplies and some units began to break with Kawaguchi’s plan, fighting on to the point where they were bypassed and cut off. A general breakdown in communications made matters worse and soon the entire defence began to crumble, falling apart and becoming a series of local skirmishes where the Allied forces could inflict a defeat in detail on the Japanese forces. Things got considerably worse when a fresh front was opened in the east, where the British had finally gathered enough forces, courtesy of 8th Indian, to assault the defences along the coast that had been increasingly thinly held as Kawaguchi tried to hold off the assault in the west and south.

Kawaguchi’s troops had put up a stiff fight, but by the 20th of July they were running out of everything, including manpower, and they were unable to mount a prolonged defence of Samarinda when the first elements of I Corps reached the outskirts on the 22nd, with 5th Indian approaching from the north on the 24th. The city finally on the 30th of July, with the last shattered remnants of the IJA forces falling back, losing most of their remaining supplies in the process. With Samarinda taken and the Japanese reduced to a few isolated pockets in the east the island of Borneo was declared secure on the 4th of August. Coming at the height of the fighting in Normandy this achievement went almost unnoticed in the British and American media. It was also arguably a premature announcement as skirmishing continued until the end of October, when the last pockets of Japanese resistance were crushed, though rumours persisted of lost Japanese platoons hiding out in the jungle for years after the end of the war [7].

Whatever the truth of these rumours Kawaguchi was not among those who hid out in the jungle, nor did he see the need to atone with his life for his failure to do the impossible and hold Borneo. He surrendered to Indian troops on the 3rd of August just east of Samarinda. His post war memoirs were scathing about the performance of his superiors in Tokyo and contributed to him becoming something of an outcast in the circles of Japanese veterans [8].

A few scattered garrisons survived in the outlying islands of the DEI into early 1944, largely because British resources in South East Asia were now focused on targets to the north, with Thailand acting as the prelude to a drive into French Indochina, while the American prepared to land in the Philippines [9].

[1] Split this off from the rest of the DEI operation to reflect the delay between the naval battle and the renewed Allied advance.

[2] A microcosm of the arguments over invading Japan later.

[3] Napalm may or may not have been used in Borneo, I leave that argument up to alt-historians.

[4] All that zealous indoctrination is not helping when you need your troops to follow a decidedly more pragmatic plan.

[5] On the one hand the Australians are asserting their own interests, on the other they are potentially weakening their influence by reducing their involvement on the front lines.

[6] On of the problems of greater Allied success is that some people feel they can indulge in ‘normal’ politics, and they have their eyes on the post war world rather than winning current battles.

[7] There will indeed be the odd Japanese soldiers emerging from the wilderness even as late as the 1970’s, though the degree to which they still thought the war was still on is debatable.

[8] Not popular but alive at least.

[9] Detailed accounts of those battles still to come once the little matter of D-Day has been dealt with…
 
28th June – 4th August 1943 – Dutch East Indies - Borneo – The Drive to Samarinda

......

Australian, New Zealand, and Canadian divisions in the Pacific theatre were increasingly withdrawn, either for refit or moved to the European theatre of operations. ....
I would suggest that with the Japanese still on their doorsteps, neither the Australian nor the New Zealand forces are going anywhere. The Canadians will most likely head back to Europe but the ANZACs are staying where they are.
 

Garrison

Donor
I would suggest that with the Japanese still on their doorsteps, neither the Australian nor the New Zealand forces are going anywhere. The Canadians will most likely head back to Europe but the ANZACs are staying where they are.
Well, that's the thing the Japanese are no longer on their doorstep and are being driven back on all fronts. At this point some Australian politicians are trying to flex their muscles, Australian troops will return to the frontlines in due course.
 
Well, that's the thing the Japanese are no longer on their doorstep and are being driven back on all fronts. At this point some Australian politicians are trying to flex their muscles, Australian troops will return to the frontlines in due course.
And politicians get more mileage out of fear mongering. What goes down better with the electorate?
First we have this.
Our boys have done enough in our own backyard. Let the Poms and the Indians deal with the Japs now, even in Rabaul and New Guinea. We intend sending our troops far across the globe to where they can make a difference, fighting the Hun. Don't you worry about our north, the Poms have that all in hand.
now contrast that with,
The Party in power is ignoring our safety and trusting in the Poms and colonial troops to safeguard Australia. Wasn't Singapore supposed to prevent all this? And now they want to send our troops to the other side of the world while the fight is still going on in south East Asia? Let's make our own region safe before we send our gallant boys to the far side of the globe. And just how are the Germans and Italians a threat to us now? Our interests lie in our region. Let's get that sorted before we worry about the rest of the world!

So which party will get the votes?
And don't forget that Curtin fought to get the troops back to Australia. The Labour Party was always keen on local defence.
 

Garrison

Donor
And politicians get more mileage out of fear mongering. What goes down better with the electorate?
First we have this.
Our boys have done enough in our own backyard. Let the Poms and the Indians deal with the Japs now, even in Rabaul and New Guinea. We intend sending our troops far across the globe to where they can make a difference, fighting the Hun. Don't you worry about our north, the Poms have that all in hand.
now contrast that with,
The Party in power is ignoring our safety and trusting in the Poms and colonial troops to safeguard Australia. Wasn't Singapore supposed to prevent all this? And now they want to send our troops to the other side of the world while the fight is still going on in south East Asia? Let's make our own region safe before we send our gallant boys to the far side of the globe. And just how are the Germans and Italians a threat to us now? Our interests lie in our region. Let's get that sorted before we worry about the rest of the world!

So which party will get the votes?
And don't forget that Curtin fought to get the troops back to Australia. The Labour Party was always keen on local defence.
Let's say its a decision that will prove less popular than expected and will be reconsidered.
 
Top