Could the Mughals maybe have survived as ceremonial kings over India in a constitutional monarchy if the British hadn't ousted them after they gave their support to the Sepoy revolt/if they didn't give any support whatsoever to the Sepoy revolt? Or would they eventually have been stripped from royal status anyway? Do you think Indian independance advocates even would've wanted the Mughals?
Edit: Yeah, sorry, I'm not sure if it's fully appropriate here. I apologize if it's not.