alternatehistory.com

What would the outcome of various additional post-WWI plebiscites have been had they been held?

As for my own thoughts on this, here goes:

-Alsace-Lorraine: Either most or all of Alsace-Lorraine votes for France. In the days of the German Empire, a large part of Alsatians voted for either secessionist or autonomist parties; this, combined with insults such as the Saverne Affair, would have probably secured a victory for France in Alsace-Lorraine.

-The Saarland (in 1920 rather than in 1935): The same result as in 1935--specifically an overwhelming victory for Germany due to the overwhelming ethnic German percentage of the total population there.

-Posen and the Polish Corridor: Since these areas were strongholds of the Polish Party in the days of the German Empire, Poland would probably win plebiscites there. However, it is possible that most of these territories vote for Poland while a strip of territory around Thorn/Torun (which had a large ethnic German population) votes for Germany.

-Danzig: An overwhelming victory for Germany due to the overwhelming ethnic German percentage of the total population there.

-The Memelland: I could certainly be wrong about this, but the Memelland doesn't strike me as being a hotbed of secessionism during the days of the German Empire. Thus, Germany probably wins a plebiscite there.

-Transylvania: The Hungarian-majority/Szekely-majority areas generally vote for Hungary and the Romanian-majority areas generally vote for Romania. I am unsure about the German-majority areas, though. Due to the ethnic geography of Transylvania, this would mean that Hungary would keep the Szekely Land along with a connecting strip while Romania would acquire the rest of Transylvania.

-Trentino and South Tyrol: The plebiscite results there would probably be more-or-less based on ethnic lines--with Austria winning German-majority South Tyrol while Italy wins Italian-majority Trentino. I am unsure as to who the small Ladin population in South Tyrol would vote for, though.

-Fiume: Italy wins due to Fiume's Italian-majority population. However, Yugoslavia will probably win a plebiscite in nearby Slovenian-majority areas.

-Austria and the Sudetenland: Germany wins due to the overwhelmingly ethnic German population of these areas. Indeed, back then, there was the widespread belief that Austria wouldn't be very viable as an independent state.

-Southern Slovakia (including Pressburg/Bratislava) and northern Vovjodina: Hungary wins due to the Hungarian-majority population of these areas.

-The Middle East: If the results of the King-Crane Commission are anything to go by, Palestine, Jordan, Syria, and the peripheral areas of Lebanon would join up to create an independent Greater Syria. Meanwhile, the Christian-majority area around Mount Lebanon would probably become a separate independent rump Lebanon. As for Mesopotamia (Iraq), if the King-Crane Commission results are anything to go by, it would probably become a separate independent state (but probably without Kurdistan--which will become independent).

-Western Anatolia: Since there were more Turks than Greeks in western Anatolia--even in the parts of it with a lot of Greeks--Turkey would probably win a plebiscite throughout western Anatolia (even in areas such as Smyrna).

-Vilnius and western Ukraine and Belarus: Poland wins. Specifically, Poland wins in Vilnius due to the large ethnic Polish population there and wins in western Ukraine and Belarus due to the Bolsheviks being the only alternative there.

Anyway, exactly which territories--if any--am I forgetting to mention here?

Also, any thoughts on all of this?
Top