Monroe Doctrine Part of US Constitution

Because he's obsessed with seeking our approval. Like a Britney fan who tries to burglarize her house, claiming they only wanted an autograph. :rolleyes:
 
I'd recommend a verbal interrogation by Marcos and RFK. That would be like verbal waterboarding, and he would never bother us again. ;)

*Have you ever seen RFK's glare? Rather frightening to the uninitiated.
 
For being un maudit petit-vierge qui parle toujours des conneries, et qui est moins mature qu'un enfant de six ans.

For being a (Expletives deleted) who always talks about idiocies and is less mature than a six year-old.
 
I have heard quite a bit about this "General Mung Beans." Just out of curiosity, what was he banned for? :confused: (Besides apparently annoying every last member of this board.) It must have happened before I joined.

Well, to be honest, I joined only a few days before his final banning. What I do know though is he loved to wank himself, such as a thread where he made himself Chief Justice of the Supreme Court....:rolleyes:
 
GMB was banned a little over a month ago for refusing to cease certain patterns of behavior, despite several warnings.

Now, as for the Op's question: It would certainly be irrelevant and completely unenforceable in 1789. Heck, the U.S. barely had hte navy to enforce the doctrine until the later part of the 19th century. Theres really no reason for it to be a part of the constitution, or plausible circumstance under which it would get in there - but if it does, Britain and the other European powers just say "aww, isnt that cute," and go on their merry colonizing way.
 
Top