Given the work on the "Aerial Torpedo" in 1918, the As-292 (FZG-43), Ryan target drones, & the pulsejet, was it impossible (or just improbable) for any power to field a PT/MTB or small DD with a variety of crude, short-range guided missile before 1944?
The VT receiver fit in a 40mm shell. A semi-active homing guidance system would do nicely.Simon said:How small were they able to get radar sets by the end of WWII, depending on size could we perhaps see a large-ish missile that uses radar to home in on targets in a fire-and-forget mode?
For a DD or 'vette, that's not an unreasonable radar mast height (& for PTs, working in pairs wouldn't be a bad idea: one as an illuminator), if Bat is your weapon of choice. I prefer Felix because it's purely passive.ModernKiwi said:Put the radar on a mast 50' up. Now you've extended the horizon to 8-9 miles. Which in the scheme of WW2 things isn't too bad. I doubt you'd get very good range measurements out of it in anything but the smoothest seas though. 50' is very high for a PT boat although I imagine a corvette or the like might manage it OK.
That's pretty much my thinking, too: something with about a 500pd warhead, comparable to a torpedo, but smaller & faster, with a longer range & higher hit probability. Something also useful against merchants, for use by subs, too? Or useful against DDs for MTBs & subs?Simon said:Depending on how big the missiles are could we perhaps see them being put on corvettes, or possibly even something Fairmile D MTB-sized, as a way of giving it an extra kick against destroyers and bigger ships?
Working in pairs you can do that with *Seabat. A *Seacat would offer the same option, with only one ship.Simon said:One idea I had was you find the enemy, or even better someone else finds them for you, blind fire the missile on an arc trajectory to where they are and after a certain point the radar kicks in and guides it in for the terminal phase. Has the major benefit of being fire and forget
Adding wings/airframe & a 3" rocket would be dead easy. So would adding a motorcycle engine. (The GB-4s were much like that.) Say, a piston-engined Gargoyle with "heat vision"?ModernKiwi said:Do keep in mind that both BAT and Felix are bombs, not missiles. No propulsion system other than gravity.
Not actually. PTs or MTBs carried four torpedoes (about 3000pd each) & 4 tubes (about another 2000 each?).ModernKiwi said:Your sea launched missle is likely to weigh in around 1.5 tons. On a PT boat (35-40 tones top weight). you'd be lucky to get two on board.
That works. I was thinking about something more like a small V-1 (very short span bipe/X-wing), with catapult launcher(s) & reload capability, something akin to IJN torpedo tubes, on a turntable of some kind.Simon said:If you can get a...fire and forget option then something like the set-up on the modern day Russian Tarantul-class corvettes, stick a pair of twin launchers on each side of a corvette and not bother with carrying reloads, would be rather interesting.
Not a bad idea IMO. Germans trialled Nebelwerfer (42cm?) for U-boats.LeoXiao said:This might be a completely retarded idea, but what about putting the Katyusha rocket rails on boats? I wonder if the Soviets ever tried it.