I'm afraid you have to go <1900 forum for this.What is the best PoD for a non militaristic Imperial Japan?
It depends how you mean it but if you mean rise of militarism in 1930s then you could have the emperor take a hard stance against them at the beginning so they are all treated like how the Kodoha faction was treated after Feb 26 incidentWhat is the best PoD for a non militaristic Imperial Japan?
Did the emperor even have power to do that?It depends how you mean it but if you mean rise of militarism in 1930s then you could have the emperor take a hard stance against them at the beginning so they are all treated like how the Kodoha faction was treated after Feb 26 incident
Yep.Did the emperor even have power to do that?
Yes, I mean the ones who were committing crimes and their associates, (like in Feb 26) just have other similar incidents like the october incident have big punishments for all involvedDid the emperor even have power to do that?
Probs No USA. Soviets have to do the hardwork more.How does no Japanese militarism impact ww2?
Pretty much impossible with Entente bictoryAHC : Make Russia Eurasianist and France Communist after a White Victory in Russian Civil War.
It also means that 1.5 mln Soviet soldiers do not have to be deployed in Asia to guard against JapanProbs No USA. Soviets have to do the hardwork more.
UK may Scrounge up men launch D-Day
Probs China goes to Europe.
I was saying it to happen in 1930s.Pretty much impossible with Entente bictory
Yep. So is for UK.It also means that 1.5 mln Soviet soldiers do not have to be deployed in Asia to guard against Japan
Difficult. They would have to get 35-45% of votes max they had was 15%I was saying it to happen in 1930s.
What about EurasianistsDifficult. They would have to get 35-45% of votes max they had was 15%
I remember reading about a white army general who was Eurasianist or something similar but I cannot find him now. You will have to wikipedia surf to find himWhat about Eurasianists
Really? Thanks a lot. It will greatly help the tl.I remember reading about a white army general who was Eurasianist or something similar but I cannot find him now. You will have to wikipedia surf to find him
Since Russia lies part in Europe and Part Asia,there are some people who say Russia is more aligned to Asia and Some Radicals even say that they should conqure all of Eurasia.What is that?
I can't find the exact guy (its annoying me now) but maybe you can use Semyonov, since he wanted to create a "great mongolian state" as well as being half mongolian half Russian. If he could gain more prominence (maybe if Kolchak dies some point after taking power) then ends up being ruler of Russia then I could see him easily being influenced by Eurasian ideologists given his desires to create the mongol state it could resonate with him a lot. There is also a chance I am confusing the Eurasianst general with Semyonov but I think I recall seeing a general being labelled Eurasianst specifically and arguing russia is closer to asia but it could have been a thinker that i read about.Really? Thanks a lot. It will greatly help the tl.