Earliest Rights to Repair ?
Dose it weaken intellectual Property or Dose it eliminate Planned obsolescence?.
Dose it weaken intellectual Property or Dose it eliminate Planned obsolescence?.
For 1972 and 1984, the point is moot because McGovern and Mondale would have carried DC regardless, guaranteeing them a bare minimum of three electoral votes.Though I think I read the elector actually thought John Quincy Adams would do a better job, throughout the 20tgh century the idea was that a man gave Adams anelectoral vote to keep MOnrow from being unanimous, letting Washington have the honoe of the only unanimous choice.
So, in the biggest blowouts, if FDR in '36, Nixon in '72, or Reagan in '84 had carried all the states, who would 1-2 electors vote for to keep Washington as the only unanimous one?
WW1 or 2?What would the French post-war gains look like if Paris is destroyed?
Don't think they gain more land. There's an offchance they get Saarland, but likely the Germans get it back (but later than OTL).
Russia the aggressive and expansionist power in the 30s.'Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia Swap Reputations'.
That is, the crimes of Stalin's USSR become the gold standard for evil in the Western imagination long after its heyday, whereas those of Hitler's Germany remain a close (albeit lesser-known) second.
That all depends on how you define 'modern developed country.' There's a list of civil wars on wikipedia here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_civil_wars#Since_1945?uselang=en-gb. Personally I would say that there's a few countries on the list which count as 'modern' and 'developed' - but others' opinions may differ.Has there ever been a civil war in a modern developed country (post-1960)? (The Troubles in Northern Ireland, UK isn't bloody enough to count)? I've heard that "there has never been a civil war in a modern developed country post-1960", but I want to double check.
In that particular case, he wouldn't be allowed to run again, because he'd have served more than two years of Reagan's term.If a President of the United States ends his term prematurely, by assassination or something else and his VP becomes President for the remainder of the term, can he run for a third term because his first one isn't a full one?
Say Reagan is successfuly assassinated by John Hinkley in 1981, then George H. W. Bush becomes President. He wins re-election in 1984, would he be allowed to run again in 1988?
ThanksIn that particular case, he wouldn't be allowed to run again, because he'd have served more than two years of Reagan's term.
The relevant text from the 22nd Amendment to the USA's constitution is:
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.