Henry is six years youngerProbably Prince Henry, who would be heir to the English throne from birth. Come to think of it, if OTL Arthur had been born a girl, OTL Henry would probably have been named Arthur...
Henry is six years youngerProbably Prince Henry, who would be heir to the English throne from birth. Come to think of it, if OTL Arthur had been born a girl, OTL Henry would probably have been named Arthur...
Pretty unlikely as Catherine would be likely seen as too old for his heir by Henry VII so he will not sought her as bride for his heir here, but will look elsewhere (a niece of Emperor Maximilian, Louis XII‘s niece Germaine of Foix, Eleanor of Austria as soon she is born, maybe Margaret of Angouleme, Anne or Isabelle of Lorraine, if either of them lived)Probably Prince Henry, who would be heir to the English throne from birth.
That is possible but NOT guaranteed as Henry could also keep his OTL nameCome to think of it, if OTL Arthur had been born a girl, OTL Henry would probably have been named Arthur...
Charles III of Savoy has a shout, too, I think. Or Antoine of Lorraine. But you're right about names.Probably Prince Henry, who would be heir to the English throne from birth. Come to think of it, if OTL Arthur had been born a girl, OTL Henry would probably have been named Arthur...
My gut says Edward Bates.Who would be a plausible Republican candidate for the 1860 presidential election if I wanted them to let the South secede without being so obviously conciliatory that they wouldn't secede in the first place? The POD is a few years earlier, so there's a bit more appetite in the North for just letting them go and a bit more reluctance to go to war over it, but it seems unlikely that Lincoln or most of the other candidates would fit the bill.
If Arthur Tudor was born a girl, who would Katherine of Aragon be betrothed to?
Not the ATL Henry/Arthur, Prince of Wales meaning who she would NOT be engaged to anyone since the cradle.Charles III of Savoy has a shout, too, I think. Or Antoine of Lorraine. But you're right about names.
Possibly. Maybe if the catholic monarchs entice him with the war.If Louis XII ended up marrying Margaret of Austria in the 1490s, would Louis claiming Milan still spark war between him and Maximilian?
I presume that the pill is a mixture of enzymes and stuff?Could a reliably safe method of birth control have occurred pre-1900, and if so what's the earliest?
...wrap the penis in absorbent stuff?Could a reliably safe method of birth control have occurred pre-1900, and if so what's the earliest?
Likely as Maximilian also wanted Milan...If Louis XII ended up marrying Margaret of Austria in the 1490s, would Louis claiming Milan still spark war between him and Maximilian?
Sheepskin condoms have existed for centuries (possibly millenia) and are still used today to some capacity. granted it's not 100% safe, but neither are modern condoms. The biggest problem is getting them to become widely used.Could a reliably safe method of birth control have occurred pre-1900, and if so what's the earliest?
On a bridge, likely a small wood bridge, as the Roman bridge on that river was built laterAncient history folks, quick question: how did Caesar cross the Rubicon? Did he wade across, use a bridge, or do we know?
Thank you, that's very helpful!On a bridge, likely a small wood bridge, as the Roman bridge on that river was built later
What year are we in?Doing research for the next chapter of my TL. My aim is to have Egypt somehow emerge victorious in the Ethiopian-Egyptian War. Have barely begun research so I may come across this myself at some point, but does anyone have any ideas as to how Egypt could have won this war that I should look at in further detail? Mostly asking this as a way to kind of steer my research.