Miscellaneous <1900 (Alternate) History Thread

A re you intending that this some how replace the xenophobia that got "baked" into the Russian psyche from Mongol invasion? (And reinforced by Napoleon.)

Didn’t really think of it that way, but if you think it’s possible, then go right ahead.

Had some discussions about it on another site, and the best POD I’ve come across does indeed start with no Mongols, with the subsequent setup casting Galicia-Volhynia as the successor to Kievan Rus (sacked 80 years before the Mongols came along, even IOTL). Despite that, the lack of Mongol invasions allows Rus as whole to survive, with Galicia-Volhynia linking up trade networks with its neighbors. In time, it’s overtaken by Kiev, now the fledgling leader of ”Rus”, which styles itself as a vaguely “HRE meets the Hanseatic League!”-style confederation of trade cities controlling the main rivers and canals between them.

(Muscovite rule and Boyar authoritarianism is butterflied, too, so there’s that.)

Decent-sounding POD, I think, though as far as my additions go: It’d be a the mother of all ironies if ATL equivalents of Classical Liberalism and free-market economics emerged in Rus instead of Great Britain. Bonus points if Rus somehow became an “Eastern America”, both in the sense of wild frontier-land on the periphery where the locals have a spirit of mercantile ventures and rugged individualism and in the sense of an emerging superpower that sweeps aside its Old World rivals. Probably a stretch to have Rus survive that long, but still a fun thought all the same.
 
It could, It already reached its limit in south after defeat to Chalukya but since Northwest and Kashmir are much weaker, it is possible
Intriguing, seeing it last for a few centuries would be fun. Maybe it becomes similar to the Roman Empire in that whilst the founding dynasty perhaos dies out, other dynasties with ties to it come in to continue the empire
 
Intriguing, seeing it last for a few centuries would be fun. Maybe it becomes similar to the Roman Empire in that whilst the founding dynasty perhaos dies out, other dynasties with ties to it come in to continue the empire
It would be too late for a founding dynasty because Mauryan and Guptan empires exist and so do Hindu Epics, however, it could continue the rule of a United India or atleast parts of India for a long time
 
It would be too late for a founding dynasty because Mauryan and Guptan empires exist and so do Hindu Epics, however, it could continue the rule of a United India or atleast parts of India for a long time
That’s what I meant. A dynasty that establishes an idea of a United northern and central India even after the initial dynasty falls
 
All of the recent Feinstein drama has me wondering how things might've developed had the framers of the U.S. Constitution embraced Hamilton's idea of lifetime appointment for U.S. senators.
 
Could anyone recommend me an alt timeline where King Louis the XVI becomes a successful monarch?
Lately I can't help but feel sympathy for monarchs who were deposed and killed by the masses such as King Charles I.
 
WI: Radical reconstruction caused the south to rise again and lose again to the union.

1. what would the union policy would be
2. how would this impact southern culture
 
What if hammira chauhan didn’t welcome the Mongol rebels from the Khaliji sultanate? Could this have butterflied the siege of Ranthambore in 1301 and thus keeps the dynasty around?

@Rajveer Naha @Brahman @souvikkundu25140017 @prani
Better POD would be, what if he was not such a pain to his neighbors? I mean by this time Hindu Muslim differences on a political level had set in, he should have played his cards right you see, he should have formed a league to resist the Khilji's and once Delhi was destroyed and the Turkic Barbarians are kicked out of India should have back stabbed his now former allies, Chanakya would have been proud.
If that is a bit of a stretch then the league would have been a spoke in the Military Machine of the Turkic invaders. To defeat the Turks would require a change in tactics and strategy from cavalry to infantry and a lot of persistence, they could have effectively bled the Delhi Sultanate of blood and gold
 
Better POD would be, what if he was not such a pain to his neighbors? I mean by this time Hindu Muslim differences on a political level had set in, he should have played his cards right you see, he should have formed a league to resist the Khilji's and once Delhi was destroyed and the Turkic Barbarians are kicked out of India should have back stabbed his now former allies, Chanakya would have been proud.
If that is a bit of a stretch then the league would have been a spoke in the Military Machine of the Turkic invaders. To defeat the Turks would require a change in tactics and strategy from cavalry to infantry and a lot of persistence, they could have effectively bled the Delhi Sultanate of blood and gold
Interesting. Was there much of a drive to drive the Turks out? From what I’ve read from Eaton, and Trusckke it does seem as if by this point the Turks had been welcomed into the Indian polity frame and were seen as another competitor. Whuch was a contrast to how they were seen a century before.
 
Top