Yeah. Personally it's likelier to me than her claiming the throne. BUT we know nothing about her personality. She could.That does seem likely.
Yeah. Personally it's likelier to me than her claiming the throne. BUT we know nothing about her personality. She could.That does seem likely.
I don't think so.Wouldn't she just marry Henri IV to unite their claims?
His marriage can be butterflied e.g. by Marguerite dying of illness or childbirth.I don't think so.
The only reason for her to have a claim in the first place is to prevent Henri IV to become king of France. If she marries him, she has no claim.
(Also, he is already married anyway. In OTL, he got the annulment only after winning the civil war.)
It does not change the fact that the only reason anyone may support Marie-Elisabeth is precisely to prevent Henri IV to become king of France. If she marries him, her potential supporters would switch to another claimer like a Lorraine or a Catholic Bourbon.His marriage can be butterflied e.g. by Marguerite dying of illness or childbirth.
If Philip and Elisabeth have a son, he is heir to the throne of Spain. Even most extreme Leaguers would not want a personal union between France and Spain.If Philip and Elisabeth had a son, he could marry her and unite THEIR claims. Now that would be Habsburg-level incest
Don Carlos...but that's of course assuming the butterflies change his IOTL death.If Philip and Elisabeth have a son, he is heir to the throne of Spain
I had assumed Don Carlos had died as in OTL.Don Carlos...but that's of course assuming the butterflies change his IOTL death.
There are Maximilian II's sons. They are Marie-Elisabeth's maternal uncles but we all know this did not stop dynastic marriages at this time, especially in the Habsburg family.Well, as for Austrian Habsburgs, there are not a lot of them around. And let's not pollute the Valois bloodline like the Habsburgs did
Maximilian II's sons? God, we're going to have a Charles II of Spain but sitting on the French throne this time around. Are there no other men suitable?I had assumed Don Carlos had died as in OTL.
If he survives, you can have many changes. He may even marry Marguerite.
There are Maximilian II's sons. They are Marie-Elisabeth's maternal uncles but we all know this did not stop dynastic marriages at this time, especially in the Habsburg family.
There is also the future Ferdinand II (and his brothers but they are still a little young).
The future Ferdinand II. He is six years younger than Marie-ElisabethAre there no other men suitable?
Which means she's too old for him. She's going to be needed to produce children, can't do that with a very young man (as she would be considered fertile at around 14/15)The future Ferdinand II. He is six years younger than Marie-Elisabeth
She can wait him to come to age. A woman fertile at 14/15 is still fertile at 20/21.Which means she's too old for him. She's going to be needed to produce children, can't do that with a very young man (as she would be considered fertile at around 14/15)
Have we found the out of context message of the week , gentlemen? lolShe can wait him to come to age. A woman fertile at 14/15 is still fertile at 20/21.
I mean, age gaps are...not ideal. Example: Isabella and Katherine of AragonShe can wait him to come to age. A woman fertile at 14/15 is still fertile at 20/21.
England/Spain union would be possible if Philip II and Mary I had had a son and Don Carlos still died as IOTL. Throw in Portugal by having them succeed Sebastian. Austria is harder but can be done if this son has a daughter that marries in.Is the establishment of a hegimonic "Universal Monarchy" through personal union possible at any point after Emperor Charles V's abdication? If yes, then how can it be achieved?
Idk what qualifies as one.
Austria, Spain & France maybe?
If that's not possible, then a personal union of any 2 kingdoms between England/GB, France, Spain/Portugal and Austria.
Would any party successfully oppose any of those unions?England/Spain union would be possible if Philip II and Mary I had had a son and Don Carlos still died as IOTL. Throw in Portugal by having them succeed Sebastian. Austria is harder but can be done if this son has a daughter that marries in.
To be honest this union would be very unstableWould any party successfully oppose any of those unions?
If they had a better 19th century, Iran still declined into irrelevance and chaos, and pan-Turkic nationalism evolved like it did IOTL, then it's very likely they could've colonised them in the early 20th century after a Great War perhaps, as long as they gave Russia and Britain their fair share (probably means splitting Azerbaijan with the Russians and giving Britain most/all of the Persian Gulf).Could Ottomans have conquered Iran?
That's... Exchange Ottoman-controlled Armenia for Russian-controlled Azerbaijan?splitting Azerbaijan with the Russians