Military Force Against Reformation

Which Holy Roman Emperor had a better chance of establishing Catholic hegemony over the Holy Roman Empire (including the Netherlands)? Charles V at any POD no earlier than 1525 or Ferdinand II at any POD after his forces started suppressing Protestants in Bohemia in the Thirty Years war?

I don't mean completely stamp out the Reformation. I don't mean making Catholicism a requirement to hold any lands in the HRE. I'm looking for something like, by 3 generations after Ferdinand, the Hapsburgs are still Holy Roman Emperors, 75% of those in the HRE and the Kingdom of Bohemia are Catholic, there might be Protestant rulers around, but Catholic are the only Holy Roman Emperor, keep Netherlands in the fold, and any Protestant rulers left would have similar privileges as granted as the peace of Augsburg, but there are less of them.

To be honest, I think the odds are against them either way. Charles V and the Pope sort of got into a pissing contest with each other that resulted in the War of the League of Cognac where The Pope allowed Charles V to have control over Italy, but the prestige of the Holy Roman Emperor was greatly decreased by the whole war. That and Charles V didn't seem to think using force to stamp out the Reformation was a good use of his financial resources (OTL Thirty Years War seemed to prove him right). After the execution of Bohemian nobles, Ferdinand II was in a weak position and France would sooner or later come in. But battles are not always won by the stronger force and wars are not always won by field battles, so I think the chances of both are above zero.
 
Top