Maximum Number of Ethnic Enclaves

How do we maximise the number of ethnic enclaves in America? Not just Southerners in the South, or Asians in Hawaii, or Puerto Ricans and Samoans and Polynesians, but as many as possible.
1. Quebec after the ARW, or the War of 1812, or an extension of the ACW.
2. Blacks in Louisana and Texas after the ACW.
3. Indian country. Maybe Utah is Indian and the railroad is built someplace else, like across the northern plains and that leaves Utah alone? Perhaps if we annex all of Canada we leave the Arctic watershed as native only? See below with Alaska.
4. Hispanics in southern California. In OTL California almost split. If it does in this OTL then Hispanic immigration would not be limited by the Anglo dominated northern California. Maybe Baja California is annexed in 1845?
5. Hawaii without Asian immigrants is native Hawaiian. Or only male immigrants are let in and it is culturally Hawaiian because the different groups lose their numerous ethnic identities to their common ethnic identity of their mother. Say, the country allows Indian immigration while independent to reduce the preponderance of Chinese, then Japanese, then Phillipino imported labor.
6. Alaska doesn't have a gold rush. The Russians aren't diluted and move there preferentially for fishing, lumbering, etc. After the Russian civil war they get even more immigrants. Their population increase is slower, but it keeps a Russian identity.
7. We annex more of the Carribean. Maybe we keep Haiti after 1916 and make it a territory like Puerto Rico. They are allowed to immigrate to Puerto Rico for cheap labor and a gap in the rules let them remigrate to the US after they and their children are in Puerto Rico a few years and this qualifies them for American citizenship? Then we don't dump them later, as in 1932 in OTL.
8. We annex more of the Pacific islands from Spain. All of them, starting in 1900, and we don't annex the Phillipines.
9. We annex Mindanao from the Phillipines because of antiCatholic prejudice preventing us from annexing it all. Mindanao had less Spanish economic development than the Christian parts of the Phillipines, so more room for economic imperialism on our part.
 
The US government and the Ameriacn society from the beginning has attempted very hard to Americanize immigrants and annexed areas or whip them out (see the Native Americans). I don't see how it can allow that many ethnic enclaves, unless there's a massive change in American attitude.
 

Straha

Banned
Annexing Mexico would help if you want a hispanic enclave. We probably see lots of mini-enclaves for various mexican tribes in former mexico.
 
Not annexing the Philippines in an enclave TL is lust plain senseless. Besides, I would think that the U.S. would prefer Catholics on Muslims, nevermind all of the Catholics in Hawai'i.
 

Straha

Banned
Well heres some possible things to consider

1 After a more sucessful reconstruction why nto have a south divided between blacks, southerners and hillbillies/unionist whites?

2 In a sucessful reconstruction world I envision Texas as going on its own path and not really going in for a southern identity

3 In a mexican conquest ATL the US has large native american enclaves in former Mexico along with a MASSIVE mexican enclave in central mexico and a mayan enclave in the yucatan. The reason for the mexican enclave only being in central mexico is because until the 20th century 90% of Mexico's population lived in central mexico. The rest of mexico gets filled in with americans fast.

4 Several cajun/carribean type enclaves in southern florida/louisiana/cuba/the carribean states

5 In western Canada we've got lots of indian tribes and the metis for possible enclaves(the reason I say western canada is because lets face it a pure US victory where the US takes ALL of Canada in 1812 doesn't seem too likely).

6 And of course taking the phillipines would help

7 Central America could be another possible enclave
 
Straha said:
Well heres some possible things to consider

1 After a more sucessful reconstruction why nto have a south divided between blacks, southerners and hillbillies/unionist whites?

2 In a sucessful reconstruction world I envision Texas as going on its own path and not really going in for a southern identity

3 In a mexican conquest ATL the US has large native american enclaves in former Mexico along with a MASSIVE mexican enclave in central mexico and a mayan enclave in the yucatan. The reason for the mexican enclave only being in central mexico is because until the 20th century 90% of Mexico's population lived in central mexico. The rest of mexico gets filled in with americans fast.

4 Several cajun/carribean type enclaves in southern florida/louisiana/cuba/the carribean states

5 In western Canada we've got lots of indian tribes and the metis for possible enclaves(the reason I say western canada is because lets face it a pure US victory where the US takes ALL of Canada in 1812 doesn't seem too likely).

6 And of course taking the phillipines would help

7 Central America could be another possible enclave
Good point about the Indian tribes/languages in Mexico.
 
What about say more anti-German resentment in WWI, leading to communal rioting and the persecuted group banding tog for self-defence as occurred for blacks during the Red Summer race riots, creating separate German-speaking enclaves in parts of the Midwest and Plains states where German immigrants predominated ?
Or similarly among French speakers in Louisiana or northern NE with Cajuns or transplanted French-Canadians forming and maintaining with force of arms their own separate enclaves ?

Hmmm, maybe a longer-lasting 1863 Draft Riots, where the rioters somehow aren't subdued by federal troops and state militia, enables NYC to continue being divided along ethnic lines with distinct separate areas for Irish, Germans, Italians, Poles, Chinese, blacks, etc ?
 
Top