That's a lot of people in the territories. Only two minor issues. Edmonton is still in Alberta (the far north of it near the border, but still in it), and Prince Albert is in that Saskatchewan.
Other than that, thank you.![]()
Ah. Looking at the map, I'd figured that Prince Albert and Edmonton were in the other territories. My bad.
Sure, yeah, makes sense. I suppose if the population of Dawson had stayed at even half it's OTL peak the Yukon would have a lot more people.As far as the territories, I was thinking that mines draw people up there, and the mines are sufficiently useful that more people move up there, providing a small but real population base in the NWT.
For some reason "Erie" sounds to American to me, but I was thinking Huron. I suppose if Ontario shares the lake then Huron can too.Erie or Huron? With so many other provinces getting their names from bodies of water, taking the name of the one the Great Lakes seems plausible.
For some reason "Erie" sounds to American to me, but I was thinking Huron. I suppose if Ontario shares the lake then Huron can too.
That map mostly makes sense to me but for not having Nunavut. Especially with having transferred northern (OTL) Quebec it seems fairly implausible, and functionally ridiculous, to not have created it.
I'd also think that separating Newfoundland from Labrador would be pretty likely, though Labrador might end up a territory even with population gain.
1860s. I was thinking that it might be AH media or maybe writer's forum though. It isn't really a proper timeline after all (though one might be written with time).When's the PoD?
1860s. I was thinking that it might be AH media or maybe writer's forum though. It isn't really a proper timeline after all (though one might be written with time).
Good idea. See, I don't think of asking people in charge.When in doubt, I'd put it in the Writer's Forum. I'd PM a mod though, because I'm not exactly sure.
Good idea. See, I don't think of asking people in charge.![]()