Along with an alliance with Saudi Arabia, who also don't particularly like the UAR (because it is too republican-y)?Most unlikely duo of the century, and for some reason I love it!
Along with an alliance with Saudi Arabia, who also don't particularly like the UAR (because it is too republican-y)?Most unlikely duo of the century, and for some reason I love it!
Yes and it would behoove them to have a possible nuclear weapon deployment option via Djibouti insofar as the Soviets saw things, even if they couldn't find out if the French actually did or they just paranoidly wouldn't get over the possibility of. So they threw nukes at their impish day dreams on projected targer lists to justify their paychecks.I mean, Djibouti was still outright French, like the Comorros, as of 1962.
I'm quite unsure on whether Lebanon would join such a union. The high amounts of Christians, Non-Sunni Muslim groups would likely keep Lebanon out of such a union. Such an act would have to go through their president, who can only ever be a Christian. They may support such a union to destabilize Israel, but never join it.View attachment 922587
Map of the United Arab Republic in 1972.
I blznked that his scenario was supposed to be in 1962, yeah everything I said was based on the Soviets at their zenith so doesn't apply to his scenario per se lolNot at all, only the Northern Hemisphere was intended to be targeted in OTL Cold War nuclear war plans, seriously, not even Mexico was intended to be nuked, much less anywhere in South America, but again, if you are talking about a Zelda/Adventure Time crossover thing(?), then you can go on and nuke anywhere that you want to without looking for advice, because this whole concept of literally the entire world getting nuked, especially in 1962, just simply does not makes sense (no offense because your map is fantastic and waaaay better than mine, that I will only be able to post tomorrow!)
Also another important note, since you are talking about the year of 1962 in a Cuban Missile War, then the Soviet Union did not had access to that many nukes, nor ballistic missile technology that would be able to reach and nuke that many places in the US and elsewhere, in 1960 they only had around 1.605 nukes, whereas the United States had a whopping 18.638, the year that the worst nuclear Cold War that could occur is the year of 1985, where the Soviets had 37,000 nukes, and the US had 21,392, with a total of 61,662 nukes worldwide.
For example, neither India, nor Pakistan, nor China had nuclear weapons in 1962, and Israel only had very few rudimentary nuclear weapons (its first deliverable nuclear weapon did not come until around 1966), so you should really focus on doing whatever you want with your ASB crossover timeline, because focusing on real-life plans and stockpiles during the Cuban Missile Crisis would result in your TL becoming extremely anachronistic and nonsensical.
Repeating again, not only was the nuclear delivery technology and stockpile of the year of 1962 not able to nuke these many regions around the world, but even in the late Cold War in the 1980s in the peak of nuclear weapon stockpiles, regions like Latin America, Africa, Oceania, and Southeast Asia were not intended to be nuked at all to begin with as far as publicly-available declassified documents say, but even if certain regions outside of the Northern Hemisphere were indeed secretly planned to be nuked, then NATO, the Warsaw Pact, and China would likely only look to hit army bases, they could not waste nukes by nuking random places when they needed to deal the maximum amount of destruction as possible to incapacitate the nuclear and military capabilities of their rivals, before all of their most-populated cities, army bases, and airports were reduced to rubble.
The current year is 2024 on the map as the challenge stipulated that a descendant of Napoleon Bonaparte be ruling France today.What would be the current year of this TL?
I assume at least late 19th to early 20th century?
The map is meant to represent 2024. Hapsburg, or, properly, Tuscany-Este Italy, has mediatized dukes and whatnot in the legislature and drawing pensions. Charles Felix of Sardinia gets pressured into having Francis V of Modena named has his successor and also picks up Parma at the Congress of Vienna in this timeline. The dispossessed Parma dynasts end up in Peru in this timeline. Murat/his son Achille holds out in Naples until warring with the Hapsburgs over their consolidation of northern Italy and loses, being left only with Elbe, which never goes to Napoleon ITTL due to his demise. The kin of Danish royals hold the Norwegian and Icelandic thrones. I've gone back and forth on Nassau's exact fate, but ultimately decided that its claim to Luxembourg is mooted when the Duchy itself is inherited by a woman, as would have happened in OTL had Prussia not annexed it. The Hessians are left to pick their battles as the roads linking the western portion of Prussia to the east run through their lands and, unlike Hanover (which inherits Brunswick), they lack the patronage of a great power.I believe the Danish would have been happy with only Schleswig, though due to the people of that duchy and Holstein deliberately working for centuries to keep them messily split up between three branches so that the two duchies were never separated, I understand why it ended up being a package deal. I feel that Italy probably could have been sleep separated into at least five decent sized kingdoms with no problems, but we can perhaps assume that the Italian branch of the Habsburgs run things down there and that the people who were formerly independent Dukes got a lot more wealth and power internally, being the governors or being labeled in such a way that they would be treated as the Dukes of Thuringia were, meaning as the main stock of marriage material for the cousins of Catholic Monarchs. Interesting to see Norway and Iceland independent so early. Do they have former-Danish royals on the throne, or did they manage to find a Swede for one of them? Perhaps difficult, given the Swedish nobles booted out their own King for a Frenchman. I feel Nassau would be annoyed by the sale of Luxembourg, given they would inherit it if a woman ever reigned in the Netherlands, though perhaps after the French got that fortress (assuming it was not demolished like IOTL) the French got some arrangement to support Nassau by the Rhine or a garrison, incase Hesse ever started feeling cramped. Not what you want when next to a state that made most of its money by conscripting its population and renting them out. Then again, the Swiss got over it...
You're a hero for putting together a map of his TL! Post it in his current thread, too, I think it will prove popular there, tooMy attempt at a modern map for A Shift in Priorities, the OG Central Powers victory AH.
All credit to Rast for writing the timeline. Any mistakes are mine.
To answer why I'm asking to find 1962 cold war maps. Yes, I am making a Cuban Missile War timeline.
View attachment 922314
This is meant to be the POD of my "post nuclear Hyrule" Fandom AU.
One map being an OTL map of the world in 1962, a second map showing all the cities targeted and finally a map in the AU's "Present", depicting Hyrule while most of the planet is blocked out to represent the loss of knowledge of the rest of the world.An excuse to have an Adventure Time (the distant future setting) and Fallout (early cold war relics and ruins from between the late 40's to early 60's) style post apocalypse as well as for having anachronistic music playing in a medieval setting.
The map here was made by Javionicus. I requested this map made, because I like that for some countries, he went through the trouble of adding in subdivisions within the regions of certain countries. these additional divisions made it easier for one such as myself to plot out the locations of cities when making this.
All the targets mapped here are on countries belonging to Military alliances at the time (NATO, SEATO, METO, Warsaw Pact, Bamboo Curtain, NEATO).
This isn't done yet since I have things to ask:
Should colonies and unaligned countries have cities targeted too and should Africa have targets on it as well?
Everything that constitutes a major defensive, strategic, or vitally significant economic asset (military bases/major commercial infrastructure (harbors/railyards/hospitals/factories/dams/oil wells/refineries/airports)) is a possibility AFAIK. Places like Qatar and Bahrain might be erased with a few well placed warheads just by virtue of their entanglement literally physically with U.S.
military bases. Proximity alone and a counter value strike in either one of those two states capital cities instantly cuts off their economic influence in seconds and they aren't going to get help (depending on how fucked up your world is going to be) ITTL).
Now that you made me remember, I will have to apologize and fix some of these mistakes because all of these regions were indeed intended to be nuked by the Soviets, this was my mistake, because it has been a year that I do not update this map, and also because it is quite difficult to convert this map onto WorldA:Tibet and Xinjiang will be less affected by direct strikes, although fallout, refugee movements etc- same with North California, Southern Florida, Upper Michigan
is that a Mormon* and/or Boer* entity there in NA?WIP: another Alternate History Travel Guides world. I don't have much data on this one, so most of this is an ass-pull.
View attachment 922524
neither! It's a surviving Hohokam/Anasazi hydraulic dictatorship.is that a Mormon* and/or Boer* entity there in NA?
Do you have the original text from AHTG by the way?neither! It's a surviving Hohokam/Anasazi hydraulic dictatorship.
Never did I claim every place everywhere was guaranteed to be nuked by the Soviets, so, I don't know why you bring that up as a point to criticize. I also don't know anything about the Philippines and where it could get nuked and wasn't the person who brought that up. I also stated to you directly that my hypothesizing was based on me missing the year he stated the map was meant to depict and apologized for getting carried away with the extent of possible targets because I knew then that I had made that mistake.View attachment 922880
Alright so, these are some relevant excerpts from my unfinished Fallout map from a year ago, with some edits in order for it to make basic sense of the topic that we are discussing, that said, it is useful to mention some important things:
Edit: Fixed the strikes in the United States, Northern California and Southern Florida were indeed intended to be heavy hit by nukes, but the map incorrectly did not displayed that.
- Despite me intending to make a Fallout map, a retro-futuristic alternate history sci-fi world where it is heavily implied that the entire planet earth was nuked, I nonetheless stuck to my predisposal to make something be as realistic as possible, so I based the this map solely from real-life sources, therefore, I based Eurasia off the declassified list of the 1956 US nuclear war plans against the Warsaw Pact, China, and North Korea, and put the maximum amount of nuclear strikes that a WorldA map in its small size can handle
- As you might already have guessed, the blue color is for American nukes, the red color is for Soviet nukes, I was not able to find information about the inevitable British and French nuclear reprisals against the Soviet Union.
- I do not update this map in over a year, so it very well might contain errors or otherwise incorrect information.
- Since we are talking about the year of 1956, this WorldA will very well fit your 1962 Cuban Missile War timeline, but it may or may not fit later post-1960s nuclear war timelines, like how I previously mentioned, the US removed China from their nuclear target list in 1981, and even before that the US was already a de-facto ally of the PRC as late as the late 1960s during the peak of the Sino-Soviet Split, and in 1956 the US also did not intended to nuke Belgorod Oblast nor Tuva for some reason, so again, the strike plans by the 1980s and to the present-day have likely changed, but remain classified information.
- I based the map of the supposed Soviet/Russian nuclear strike sites in the United States from this article on CBS which includes a now-famous map, which uses data from FEMA and the National Resources Defense Council, however, it is important to note that this map probably dates to after the 1960s, so therefore, the US strike centers in this map likely is anachronistic, who knows what the Soviet strike plans on the US were back in 1962.
- I was not able to find comprehensive maps that detail the Soviet nuclear strikes intended to hit Alaska, Hawaii, and Western Europe (except for the UK).
- Given that I have not worked on this map for over a year, I forgot the sources where I exactly based the Soviet strikes on the UK from, but I am almost sure got the UK from the list of the 106 cities and military installations that were the most likely to be nuked by the Soviet Union during the Cold War
- Since this is the year of 1962 that we are talking about, I have not included India, Pakistan, and Israel on the list, since the first two did not had nuclear weapons back then, and the latter would only have deliverable nuclear weapons in very limited numbers in 1966.
- I will have to repeat again, the only nuclear strikes that are lacking in this map are Western Europe, Japan, and presumably South Korea, but other than that, there were no intentions from any faction in the Cold War to nuke anywhere else such as Latin America, Africa (perhaps only if Israel nukes Egypt), Southeast Asia, and Oceania, the closest that you can find about this are extremely vague "a friend of my friend told me" mentions of US bases in Australia being hit - again, military and/or naval bases, not civilian cities. This "literally the ENTIRE world would be nuked from Patagonia to New Zealand! " myth needs to end.
- Fun fact: Talking about "trust me bro" sources, the mentions of US military installations in the Philippines and Australia being likely to be hit by low-yield Soviet nukes come from this very forum!, I do not remember the exact threads, but an Australian user in here who served in the Australian Defense Forces in the 1980s, said that during a class session, his superior said that even back then in the peak of the Cold War, Australian cities were very unlikely to be hit by Soviet nukes, and if it was, the places that would be nuked were likely to be remote military installations instead of populated areas, hit with low-yield nukes bear in mind.
- Another AH forum user linked a Facebook page which had some sort of interview with a former Filipino general(?), who said that during the Cold War, the only fear of nuclear strikes that the Philippines had were of, again - US military installations (presumably in Luzon), and not civilian cities.
- I would really appreciate if you guys knew about the threads and users that I am talking about above!
OK, with that much information presented, I really feel like wanting to start over again because I my understanding of this subject is surface level.View attachment 922880
Alright so, these are some relevant excerpts from my unfinished Fallout map from a year ago, with some edits in order for it to make basic sense of the topic that we are discussing, that said, it is useful to mention some important things:
Edit: Fixed the strikes in the United States, Northern California and Southern Florida were indeed intended to be heavy hit by nukes, but the map incorrectly did not displayed that.
- Despite me intending to make a Fallout map, a retro-futuristic alternate history sci-fi world where it is heavily implied that the entire planet earth was nuked, I nonetheless stuck to my predisposal to make something be as realistic as possible, so I based the this map solely from real-life sources, therefore, I based Eurasia off the declassified list of the 1956 US nuclear war plans against the Warsaw Pact, China, and North Korea, and put the maximum amount of nuclear strikes that a WorldA map in its small size can handle
- As you might already have guessed, the blue color is for American nukes, the red color is for Soviet nukes, I was not able to find information about the inevitable British and French nuclear reprisals against the Soviet Union.
- I do not update this map in over a year, so it very well might contain errors or otherwise incorrect information.
- Since we are talking about the year of 1956, this WorldA will very well fit your 1962 Cuban Missile War timeline, but it may or may not fit later post-1960s nuclear war timelines, like how I previously mentioned, the US removed China from their nuclear target list in 1981, and even before that the US was already a de-facto ally of the PRC as late as the late 1960s during the peak of the Sino-Soviet Split, and in 1956 the US also did not intended to nuke Belgorod Oblast nor Tuva for some reason, so again, the strike plans by the 1980s and to the present-day have likely changed, but remain classified information.
- I based the map of the supposed Soviet/Russian nuclear strike sites in the United States from this article on CBS which includes a now-famous map, which uses data from FEMA and the National Resources Defense Council, however, it is important to note that this map probably dates to after the 1960s, so therefore, the US strike centers in this map likely is anachronistic, who knows what the Soviet strike plans on the US were back in 1962.
- I was not able to find comprehensive maps that detail the Soviet nuclear strikes intended to hit Alaska, Hawaii, and Western Europe (except for the UK).
- Given that I have not worked on this map for over a year, I forgot the sources where I exactly based the Soviet strikes on the UK from, but I am almost sure got the UK from the list of the 106 cities and military installations that were the most likely to be nuked by the Soviet Union during the Cold War
- Since this is the year of 1962 that we are talking about, I have not included India, Pakistan, and Israel on the list, since the first two did not had nuclear weapons back then, and the latter would only have deliverable nuclear weapons in very limited numbers in 1966.
- I will have to repeat again, the only nuclear strikes that are lacking in this map are Western Europe, Japan, and presumably South Korea, but other than that, there were no intentions from any faction in the Cold War to nuke anywhere else such as Latin America, Africa (perhaps only if Israel nukes Egypt), Southeast Asia, and Oceania, the closest that you can find about this are extremely vague "a friend of my friend told me" mentions of US bases in Australia being hit - again, military and/or naval bases, not civilian cities. This "literally the ENTIRE world would be nuked from Patagonia to New Zealand! " myth needs to end.
- Fun fact: Talking about "trust me bro" sources, the mentions of US military installations in the Philippines and Australia being likely to be hit by low-yield Soviet nukes come from this very forum!, I do not remember the exact threads, but an Australian user in here who served in the Australian Defense Forces in the 1980s, said that during a class session, his superior said that even back then in the peak of the Cold War, Australian cities were very unlikely to be hit by Soviet nukes, and if it was, the places that would be nuked were likely to be remote military installations instead of populated areas, hit with low-yield nukes bear in mind.
- Another AH forum user linked a Facebook page which had some sort of interview with a former Filipino general(?), who said that during the Cold War, the only fears of nuclear strikes that the Philippines had were of, again - US military installations (presumably in Luzon), and not civilian cities.
- I would really appreciate if you guys knew about the threads and users that I am talking about above!
But I mean, arent you doing a Zelda/Adventure Time fandom AU thing?, why do you insist in following real-life nuclear plans then?OK, with that much information presented, I really feel like wanting to start over again because I my understanding of this subject is surface level.