Map Thread XXI

Status
Not open for further replies.
Add Texas owning Oklahoma for some inexplicable reason to that list
I get both were settled by southerners and are in the Great Plains, but the circumstances of their settlement are so different I dunno how it ever came to be as a cliche. All the more so you can argue a bulk of Oklahoma's population is juuust close enough to Arkansas to be 'Ozarker' in culture as well. I suspect a cross of Oklahoma being west of the 98th meridian visually to keep a rump USA nice and tidy as well as the said southerners/Great Plains culture stuff.
 
r6s1v3neftn81.png

Made a Worlda Version of TheMexicanHistorian's "Most Cliche Map Possible" from Reddit, a collection of the most commonly-used cliches in AH maps all stuck together in one map

View attachment 814158
Needs more Inca.
 
I get both were settled by southerners and are in the Great Plains, but the circumstances of their settlement are so different I dunno how it ever came to be as a cliche. All the more so you can argue a bulk of Oklahoma's population is juuust close enough to Arkansas to be 'Ozarker' in culture as well. I suspect a cross of Oklahoma being west of the 98th meridian visually to keep a rump USA nice and tidy as well as the said southerners/Great Plains culture stuff.i
I'm holding out for a "Free State of Miller" timeline :)

 

Beatriz

Kicked
At this point, the problem is being able to fit enough cliches into a single map, without having them override one another
Basically this stems from scenarios being either 1) balkanized X 2) greater X or for former OTL colonies 3) colonized X and the three overlapping.

For India you could combine the three, with a League of Indian Nations including the entire raj with tier 1 and tier 2 nations, and with the tier 1 nations collectively wielding 1 seat in the *UN and some of the tier 1 nations having separate seats/embassies, and some nations acting as British dominions (see 3))

The Tripartite Alliance that featured 1) stronger multinational institutions and 2) more social progress in corners is worth reading even with butterfly nets and its early 2000s non-AH.com format
 
Last edited:
For the record, this post was NOT "low-effort"
I paid attention to many details in my school's lobby. Also, the dispersion of the students in the lobby.
I spent half a year getting the information for this map, so please, don't call it "low-effort junk". It would be similar to calling Worlda "low-effort junk", in my opinion (although to be honest, this map is definitely unable to compare to Worlda, it just took so much time to make this map as accurate as possible.)
C'mon dude
 
I guess it's a joke; the Aral Sea has become worse, indeed.
former-aral-sea-1964-vs-2022-v0-vyfplv5g3x0a1.jpg
At least the northern portion has recovered quite a bit, to the point where Aralsk can become a port again in the near future. The rest is left to its fate, unfortunately.
 
Last edited:
5IRDi9A.png


Map of Moldovan administrative divisions after a hypothetical reintegration of Transnistria.

I used the SVG from Wikipedia and based the divisions in Transnistria off the claimed district borders. Small changes include the Dubasari district, which was altered to be the Transnistrian side plus the southern part of the Moldovan side, with the rest of the Moldovan side becoming the new Cocieri district. The districts making up former Transnistria are grouped into the Transnistria Autonomous Territorial Unit, similar to Gaugazia, though it is still comprised of multiple districts.

I maintained the Cocieri district since there is a strong connection between both sides of the dniester river by the bend, and giving the whole bend back to the Dubasari district (right bank) would break such a connection. I considered merging the new Cocieri district into Orhei, but I think status quo would prevail and they'd just change one border.


edit: aaand I just noticed a mistake... I put Ribnitsa, with an s, even though i used the Romanian t with a tail
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top