You have not labelled what I can only assume is Franklin.
Or Nickajack.You have not labelled what I can only assume is Franklin.
Franklin, yes. The map had a glitch when saving and didn't save the name. What do you think of the states?You have not labelled what I can only assume is Franklin.
Overly convergent, but the map itself is perfectly good.Franklin, yes. The map had a glitch when saving and didn't save the name. What do you think of the states?
1. Iroquois probably makes more sense than Iroquia.
Overly convergent, but the map itself is perfectly good.
Yes those are good names!1. Iroquois probably makes more sense than Iroquia.
2. Silicone Valley is probably not a good name for it. My thought is that it should be called North California, and have the state currently called North California be called "Sierra," since Nevada is already taken.
Considering how early the point of divergence would need to be to have some of those states, some of the other states' borders are awfully close to OTL's state borders.Convergent?
Your "New Afrika" doesn't correlate to the Black Belt and would be a majority White state, so the name doesn't make a lot of sense. "Yazoo" or maybe "Nickajack" are more appropriate IMO.
Hmmmm....makes sense. I didn't have any other ideas.Considering how early the point of divergence would need to be to have some of those states, some of the other states' borders are awfully close to OTL's state borders.
You are correct. I wanted to make majorly black states but I didn't have the knowledge of good names or boundaries for them.Your "New Afrika" doesn't correlate to the Black Belt and would be a majority White state, so the name doesn't make a lot of sense. "Yazoo" or maybe "Nickajack" are more appropriate IMO.
Yes, but I could see some 17th/18th century person thinking Iroquia was a better choice.1. Iroquois probably makes more sense than Iroquia.
Ethnic map of Eurasia. I did an Africa one a while back (it's in some random map thread) and decided to revisit it with Asia, but the Urals, Turkish Thrace, and Bougainville complicated things and made the map look off, so I just decided to add Europe as well as a few other Areas. Some of the states in it were too small for even single digit numbers so I made several keys which were closer to the regions they covered.
No scenario for this one either, just bordergore
I've made my own version a while ago. Here it is:View attachment 608097
Ethnic map of Eurasia. I did an Africa one a while back (it's in some random map thread) and decided to revisit it with Asia, but the Urals, Turkish Thrace, and Bougainville complicated things and made the map look off, so I just decided to add Europe as well as a few other Areas. Some of the states in it were too small for even single digit numbers so I made several keys which were closer to the regions they covered.
No scenario for this one either, just bordergore
Is this OTL?I've made my own version a while ago. Here it is:
View attachment 608205
It also takes into account linguistic and religious divisions.
Definitely not. France is all wrong, for a start.Is this OTL?
Is this OTL?
Yes, this is OTL.Definitely not. France is all wrong, for a start.
Then France is all wrong.Yes, this is OTL.
If it's about language and not culture, then AFAIK Rennes never spoke Breton, but your point entirely standsThen France is all wrong.
First of all, Arpitan needs to be separate from Occitan and covers roughly Dauphiné, Romandy, Savoy and Aosta.
Second, Roussillon (Pyrrénées-Orientales) is Catalan, not Occitan.
Third, it's the entire Western half of Brittany, not just the Côtes-d'Armor, which are Breton.
In other words, either all of France is put down as Francophone and French, or you have to go with more historical culture.
And Rennes is in the Îlle-et-Villaine. But Brest and Lorient ? They're Breton.If it's about language and not culture, then AFAIK Rennes never spoke Breton, but your point entirely stands