I thought I was showing that it was starting to slow down not accelerate the colonization of Africa with the independent states that are influenced by others. Then in the next map set after this I planned to have more of them independent. Just some inflenced. I had this plan for a Brazil going into post colonial Africa.
I understood that but it still seemed somewhat unlikely; these are countries that want to be free of European influence, a deal where they still have to bow to a foreign power that they want nothing to do with is going to be massively unpopular. On the European side, colonization of Africa is going to be massively unpopular as subjugation of angry native populations is going to look like a huge drain on resources when there's free, unpopulated land for the picking elsewhere. Every dollar going into African colonies is not only a dollar away from the motherland but also a dollar not going into securing influence in the terra nullis. For this reason decolonization would probably occur much more quickly; why would Germany worry at all about the affairs of some small country in Africa when there's substantially more money to be made elsewhere?
Italy invaded it. I forgot to mention but the map is set in 1950 but the new world appeared in 1900. So I thought with the other powers looking at the new land and outside of Africa Italy moved in to fill the gap.
It seems like with an uber-Germany in Europe though, Ethiopia would have no trouble securing a strong ally interested in curbing the influence of a rising European star. An independent Egypt would be similarly interested in reducing Italy's African presence. When did this happen and under what circumstances?
That is what I was asking if it seemed to excessive. I kinda pictured something like how the ROC ran to Taiwan only in this scenario something different happened and the United Kingdom offered to help protect them. If that makes since.
It seems excessive to me as Britain was unable/unwilling to do this at any point OTL and China would never stop fomenting unrest in the occupied areas. Given that there seems to still be an Imperial Japan in the region that has conflicting interest in Asia, you can bet Britain will have a tough time getting a victory of this sort, particularly if the US isn't helping (which seems likely given that the distance between the US and China is now more than doubled and the US will likely be more interested in settling the new land than kicking much less threatening Communists out of China).
I interpreted it as the United Kingdom and France decided to stay out of Europe while they focus on the new land. As for the Russia part they have alot of new land to colonize to the East. So the resources and new trade was enough to keep the people happy.
My only qualm with this is that even with colonialism OTL, conflict in Europe didn't stop happening, it just happened more on foreign soil and when it
did happen in Europe it happened a LOT. Britain and France, even with new lands, would still be concerned with the balance of power on the continent I imagine, particularly given Germany's new control over vast swathes of developed land while the new British and French colonial empires would be mostly wilderness.
With all this new land to the East I figured they started to want more available path ways to the East. It is also heavily inspired by Jcw3s original which had about the same amount of land conquered. Do you think Russia could not do it?
Partly could not but mostly would not. Russia ITTL has been beaten more badly in the Great War than OTL and so I imagine would have difficulty expanding their influence around Mongolia to higher heights than they reached OTL. Greater desire for access to the Pacific makes sense for seeking control over Manchuria I suppose but they'll run into the same problems they faced with Imperial Japan as OTL as well as a unified and autonomous China. More than anything though, in my mind, is the existence of a massive, stable, powerful Germany being just a stone's throw from Moscow; I imagine that this will dominate foreign policy more than anything else.
Dont think about it to hard. Jcw3 had the original idea I am just borrowing it and seeing what I can make out of it.
Fair enough. If you wanted, you could make it a kind of donut-world so that North now connects to South, which would make for some interesting new international variables. Of course, that would raise all sorts of questions about the day-night cycle and the climate but with such a complex geographical idea, a bit of handwavium is to be expected x)
Again this happened in the original. I interpreted it as France wanting to focus on its little African Empire and Japan wanting to secure its Pacific access. So I dont really know how it traded hands. Maybe they bought it, maybe they revolted and was conquered by Japan? Have any ideas? Or do you think it should stay french or independent?
Well, I would say that China would object but I guess the British presence in southern China would negate that. I'm inclined to lean toward independence, in line with accelerated decolonization + Japanese focus turned East but it's your project of course.
I guess I used the wrong color I should of used colony color. All the OTL maps show Morocco as the same color as Spain. As for revolution I guess it got butterflied away because I forgot about it. For the different borders this is what the OTL map shows at 1900
so I took it as those states going different ways. At that point were they for sure going to go to the french? I could always change it.
If the Second Republic is still in power, and particularly if the Restoration continues unabated, interest in Morocco will likely remain, at least for a while. Of course, Morocco fell mostly under French rule so total Spanish control seems a bit unlikely in any scenario; as far as my knowledge goes, Spain just wasn't in a position to assert control over such a large, hostile, and developed population. An attempt to conquer and hold all of Morocco by the Restoration (probably the only government that would attempt such a thing) would probably lead to a much more radical Republic taking control and perhaps even a fracturing of Spain. Control of Morocco in 1950 seems far-fetched in any scenario though, at least to my eyes.
This was also in the original. With all the new land the British were a lot more relaxed. They also needed some colonist from from more than just the isles. Eventually later in the time line I see it evolving into something like the Imperial Federation
It seems that if the British were more relaxed, though, they would just grant India independence sans-Ghandi. India wanted independence bad, and the British weren't really interested in forming an Imperial Federation with India as India would inevitably be the center of any sort of equal union. Even if these tensions were relaxed with a colonization of new lands by the British Empire rather than just Britain, it seems to me that racism would still carry over tensions to the new lands as Indian and British settlers would be culturally distinct and questions of which lands were British and which were Indian would begin to be raised.
Sorry I keep saying this but again that was in the original also. Jcw3 gave the reason in later maps that the United states was basically leaving Earth politics and focusing only on colonization. Without being able to get to it from the Pacific it is awful far. Maybe it was given tot he United Kingdom. Maybe it was given independence and applied to join so it has a chance to get some islands since the Pacific is kinda sparse compared to the west.
No problem! Adhering to the same ideas as the original is fine. Jcw3 also explained that the Philippines fell under the British sphere of influence. I suppose I see this happening but I can't see the Philippines submitting to any foreign power. If the change happened in 1900, in came just in the middle of the Philippine-American War, a war that saw Americans employ and develop torture tactics on Filipino rebels and civilians alike and a time where Filipino desire for independence was running
high. Independence from the US I can see happening rather quickly but any new government that bowed to another Western power would find itself out of power rather quickly. What I can see is either a Filipino-Japanese alliance against the British or a Filipino-British alliance against the Japanese but becoming a dominion in the British Empire is pretty much off the table entirely as far as I can see.
Im getting there when I start to put colonization in. You can see that Argentina and Peru are already getting powerful. Japan will be making an empire and Russia too. I just haven't got to the new worlds yet. You also have the remember that this did appear at one of the heights of colonialism its not going to flip quickly.
Also if I end up changing China did I do the claims right or how would that work? Any other questions, advice or ideas? This is a lot of fun for me making this.
Argentina and Peru are indeedgetting powerful, though I'm wondering why Peru's neighbors let that happen; it seems that Colombia and Chile would find common ground against that which I guess makes me wonder how Colombia and Chile got so thoroughly screwed. I understand that the change happened at one of the heights of colonialism but by 1950, it's at the point where OTL decolonization was becoming impossible to oppose. In this world, for reasons I stated earlier, it seems that decolonization would be accelerated. As far as Chinese claims go, I'm no expert on China but I would imagine they wouldn't be particularly satisfied with their Russian border.
I'm glad you're having fun with it!