Development levels, but as of 1890-1900, blended with geography. Australia in 1900 was pretty developed outside of the deep bush.
So you could substitute advanced local civilizations for recent immigrants from halfway around the planet?
Development levels, but as of 1890-1900, blended with geography. Australia in 1900 was pretty developed outside of the deep bush.
003. The Conclusion of Geopolitics
dA link
This map is based on a Russian book titled “Foundations of Geopolitics.” I have yet to find a copy in a language I understand, so my interpretation is based on the Wikipedia entry and the English translation of its table of contents. I’m not saying I understand the project at all, but when I visited Seoul and stumbled on a unification fair, there was a tent that was displaying children’s school books smuggled out of the North. One English language book (why North Korean children are learning English is already puzzling) was very interesting in its first lesson vocabulary: Revolution, glorious, patriot, etc.
When taking notes on this project, I felt a bit of deja vu.
“Foundations of Geopolitics” is a nearly 600 page book written/compiled by one Mr. Aleksandr Dugin. The book is, if reports are believed, popular among Russian military, elites, and even the Top Dog himself, President Putin. Does that mean that Dugin is making policy decisions and is the shadow master behind the Eurasian project?
No. Obviously not. I say “obviously” because there’s already political happenings and decisions taking place that go against Dugin’s strategy. At least as many (like China) that act counter to actions where his strategy is clearly being implemented (Ukraine). If I were to make a serious conclusion about the influence of Dugin’s book, it is more like a strategy guide than an ideological purity test of international focus. Were the goals Dugin lays out to actually be achieved, they will most likely take a different course of actions than what we see in the book. Think of the Bible, if all Christians listened and followed every word it said exactly, we’d still have slavery and no banking industry (story for another time).
This map (with no year decided but I had imagined it being 7 October 2052, Putin’s 100th Birthday) takes Dugin at his word and portrays the world as he would like to play Russia if he was suddenly given the keys.
I won’t rehash the English sources on the book (they’re either quoted directly above or portrayed directly on the map) but I will need to explain the parts of the map that are extensions of Dugin’s logic but not explicitly described.
The two areas he doesn’t seem to touch are Africa and South America. Reasonable since access to them precludes unrestricted naval access, Russia’s perennial problem (outlined by Admiral McMahon and portrayed often by Tom Clancy). While they’ve been gunning for access to the sea at least since St. Petersburg was built, and arguably was a motivation behind the First World War, domination of the sea trade and market access still eludes Russia in the ways that other countries (like the dual ocean United States) has just fine. Dugin’s main idea tries to turn this naval strategy (called by the euphemism “Atlanticism”) on its head, and make a united Eurasia to combat the influence from oceanic power. Dugin insists that conventional military strategies haven’t really worked for Russia in the past, so expansive espionage, subterfuge, and propaganda campaigns should be favored instead.
The German sphere of influence (with France as junior partner) is “all of Catholic and Protestant Europe.” This basically summarizes most of the EU today, which Russia would certainly want to keep for shopping vacations and a market place to sell all of that Natural Gas. The ultimate goal is “Finlandization,” keeping Europe weak and out of “Atlanticist” hands. This means that, like in the world before 1500, the Atlantic Ocean will become a relative backwater. Russia knows what pirates did in the Aden Gulf, and the ultimate victory here would be to make America and her allies uncomfortable in to sail here. In this world, there’s a rise in old, rogue, Soviet-era captains with aging, retired, or stolen ships that prowl the general lawlessness of the Atlantic.
This Russia would need to do with China what it did to Europe. In this world, (colored purple because they’re neither an ally nor enemy of Russia… picture Austria’s relationship with Germany 1850-1900), Russia made sure to dismantle the least Chinese parts of China and absorb them into “the Eurasian Project.” She now has access to the Sea via Manchuria but it’s a shaky position at best. While Russia will insist that the American settlers of Alaska and Hawaii were Russian, and seek to annex them, she’ll also want to encourage China to be their proxy power in the Pacific, encouraging and helping them get that pipeline in Burma, in securing the Spratly Isles, and in gaining exclusive mining rights in Australia.
Iran “as a key ally” and Islam in general as allied to anti-Atlanticist ideology, is another key here. Russia will draw lines of battle not against Christian civilization and Islamic civilization, but as the mystical, romantic east (of which they are a part) versus the rational, overly logical west (there’s a lot to say here, but this is not the place for that…). These two prongs – a naval China, and an Islamic bloc – is how Russia, now the master of Eurasia, will expand into Africa and South America, serving as the endgame of their world strategy: the conclusion of geopolitics.
Now hold off on that polonium. I didn’t make this map out of some commentary on Putin’s politics, or to serve as a warning of the dystopian future that awaits if Russia becomes the sole world power. Actually, I would expect stability, high market access, increased consumer goods, higher standards of living, and a Eurasia of many cultures to be one that is generally prosperous and beneficial for its denizens, regardless of the political structure that got it there. Imperial China wasn’t always bad, and neither was the century of Pax Americana. While Dugin is an honest-to-God Fascist, he’s only human, and plans, even if they succeed, have a way of getting out of hand. This time line sees a world where Russia, and by extension Russians themselves, rise exponentially on the world stage. Some places may be falling by the way side, some old infrastructure will crumble, some politicians bought off, but I guess what I’m getting at is that this version of earth (taken as a whole) isn’t a dystopia. No more than ours is.
Artistic notes: The flag of Eurasia is a “North Koreanized” version of the current Russian flag. No, it’s not a political choice. They come from this thread (www.reddit.com/r/vexillology/c…) by u/Driver3 and only because I love most of those flags. My personal favorites are Bhutan, Kazakhstan, South Korea, and… well, frankly, I prefer most of them to most of the maps we have in the world currently.
Interesting, if completely implausible.A Map of 2017 for a scenario I'm planning out called Bellum Aeturnus
Europe As It Should Be by Louis P. Bénézet (1918)
![]()
Independent Uber-Wales but Ulster is still a part of England? Weird.I saw this map and got inspired. Some of the borders could be better, but I guess I'm satisfied. Based off the UCS 1914 map.
![]()
Going to have to keep this tactic in mind. Might be a bit easier than trying to trace Google Earth every time I need a new base map!Snipple
For this very special day, I thought I'd share some of my best works, from me to you
April Fools! Have fun with your burning eyeballs!
Based on House of the Scorpion:
![]()
Based on Skyrim:
![]()
Idea for an "Inverted world," Where land is sea and sea is land:
![]()
Don't worry, my eyes are burning as much as yours. I'm sad that once upon a time I made these maps, but I'm so glad I have improved as much as I have. I'm sure you guys are just glad I've improved too and not chugging out this crap this bad nowadays. Happy April fools, and all that.
(By the way, I haven't even subjected you to the worst map)
Meh, look at this![]()
Quick question for big-map makers: How do you do it?
Just finished making this big blank map of England, and I used google maps to stitch together a map of it, before "lasso"-ing the outlines until I got to the end, where I used border select to make the border.
I'm just interested to learn how other map makers do it
Feel free to use this! (Don't worry, I'm going to cross-post this in the blank map thread, it's just my question is more related to this thread).
![]()
Now the internationalism has taken us Berlin and Usedom! ;-;I won't flood the map thread with WIPs, but just the one. Here's a little project I'm working on, using a template from the lovely MBAM creators. A future TL, hence the sunken Netherlands; trying to figure out how the provinces of this Carolingian 2.0 would merge over time, I want the borders from the modern day to be indistinguishable, though corners such as Bavaria and Occitania can remain distinct. Also Schweiß can into Voralberg.
View attachment 314792
Now the internationalism has taken us Berlin and Usedom! ;-;
Make Germany great again, retake 1937 borders! Or even better - 1939!!!
I would love to see Russia implement this given that the bits of China it's chopped off have MORE PEOPLE THAN IT.
Kinda would make the "managed democracy" facade untenable, assuming that they succeeded without a Sino-Russian nuclear exchange...
Why not make Berlin an Anarchist State?No, I was just too lazy to colour them in. I'll colour them in the finished product.
I don't think so, the Polish-lead Intermarium is the most powerful military force in Europe.
Part III of my Race Invasion of 1944 series. This is only a WIP because a writeup will come to describe the current world. Map date: June 2, 1963:
![]()
I would love to see Russia implement this given that the bits of China it's chopped off have MORE PEOPLE THAN IT.
Kinda would make the "managed democracy" facade untenable, assuming that they succeeded without a Sino-Russian nuclear exchange...