Map Thread XIX

Status
Not open for further replies.

Deleted member 108228


Status of the Republic of Vietnam
A Summary of the Events from 1955-1985


Overview

The Republic of Vietnam, more commonly known as South Vietnam, is a country located in a region formerly known as “Indochina”, which also includes the Kingdoms of Laos and Cambodia, as well as the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. Although the Republic of Vietnam is officially a multiparty democracy, in reality it is ruled by Ngo Dinh Quy, a nephew of the late Ngo Dinh Diem, the country’s first president.


1955-1965

After Diem had ousted the former emperor Bao Dai from office in a fraudulent referendum, Diem began to solidify his rule over the country. He destroyed the Binh Xuyen crime syndicate, as well as suppressing the Hoa Hao and Cao Dai religious sects. In addition, he also reached out to the United States for help and support against his greatest threat, the Chinese and Soviet backed North Vietnamese. In exchange for serving as a bulwark against the Communist Northerners, Diem would receive economic and military support. Despite this, by the 1960s, a significant portion of the country’s rural areas would be under the control of the Viet Cong. This would be Diem’s greatest challenge, as it could either make or break the fledgling Republic.

In response to this, in the late 50’s, Diem issued a series of reforms aimed at reducing the Viet Cong’s support in the countryside. However, these reforms only seemed to be stopgap measures that did nothing to fix the fundamental issues concerning peasant grievances towards the Diem regime. As such, these “reforms” only succeeded in driving more peasants into the arms of the Viet Cong. The Viet Cong, now a legitimate threat to the country, began a campaign of popular mobilization, resulting in much of the countryside rallying to their banner.

However, in early 1961, Diem’s brother Ngo Dinh Nhu was killed in a car crash, leading to what many called “Diem’s moral transformation,” owing to Nhu’s great influence on Diem’s policymaking. Almost immediately after Nhu’s death, Diem began secret peace talks with the Communist North. Surprisingly, the Viet Cong advance began to simultaneously falter. With Diem realizing the implications of a successful peace between the two Vietnams, he needed to defeat the existing Viet Cong in a way that would allow them to dissolve without causing further international backlash. In the meantime, however, he continued to employ the same heavy-handed methods that he had employed since becoming president in 1955.


1965-1975

Ten years into Ngo Dinh Diem’s rule, the country began to make some strides in managing the Viet Cong threat. Diem began to listen to the advice of Americans sent to coordinate the country’s military and political situation, yet he would be what some would call a ‘rock’; fiercely stubborn in his nationalist resolve. Case in point, his staunch favoritism of Catholics over Buddhists. While not as hardline as the late Nhu, his domineering behavior was evident in his governance of the country. Yet the death of Nhu aided in the softening of reforms involving religious expression.

Captured documents indicated that the offensive was supposed to happen in ‘68, during the Tet celebrations, yet power struggles between General Giap and Party Secretary-General Le Duan ultimately set back the offensive by 3 years. Yet when it did happen, the powerbase the Viet Cong relied on would ultimately not support them, given the successive land reforms. The Tet Offensive would result in tens of thousands of casualties for the Viet Cong, and only hundreds for the South Vietnamese. This was due to lackluster planning, uncoordinated planning, and an ultimate disillusionment towards the Viet Cong. By the time the attempt was foiled, over 80,000 Viet Cong soldiers had been killed.

Yet the failed Tet Offensive would do more than destroy the Viet Cong’s capacity to operate in the Republic- it would also result in the breakdown of negotiations between the North and South, a resumption of hostilities, and increased American involvement in Vietnam. Bombing campaigns against the North began during Johnson’s second administration in 1971. By 1975 the nonstop bombing campaigns, raids, and missions eventually forced Hanoi to the negotiating table. Ultimately, the London Peace Accords would stipulate the following:
  • Withdrawal of support from the Democratic Republic of North Vietnam to the Viet Cong

  • Cessation of American bombing campaigns

  • Normalization of North-South Vietnamese relations

  • Cessation of American troop deployment into South Vietnam

  • The transfer of prisoners of war on both sides

  • Cessation of the state of general warfare between North and South
With this out of the way, the Republic of Vietnam began to enact reconstruction designed to prevent any form of communist invasion via the Ho Chi Minh trail.


1975-1985
The Diem regime weathered the 1970s, though not without serious issues. The 1970s oil crash threatened to bring the burgeoning economy to a grinding halt. Despite US subsidies meant to alleviate the depression, the crash sent millions of state-dependent tenants into poverty and crippling debt, driving thousands into the major cities, especially Saigon. This clash between ‘new people’ and ‘old people’ caused tension and ultimately rioting in the major cities. The elites of the Republic, especially Diem, feared that if this was unchecked, the Viet Cong could violently surge in numbers. This would incentivize the elites to come up with a program of economic aid and land reform, the likes of which had not seen before.

The main guidelines of the People’s Land program were:
  • A distribution of land owned by those who made a net sum of over 50,000 US dollars to tenants, with compensation to the landlords.

  • Said distribution will be given in land plots of 1-20 hectares, with the maximum being 15-20 hectares.

  • Subsidies for existing tenant farmers.

  • The creation of farmers banks throughout the country, with families only being allowed to own 30 percent of the voting stock.

  • The formation of Farmer’s Militias in order to combat any potential Viet Cong surge.
While the People’s Land program was on paper, a well-intentioned project, the implementation would ultimately make or break the country. Suffice to say, Diem, after years of failed policies, constant war, not to mention deteriorating health, finally allowed the Americans to implement the program. By 1978, the program redistributed over 2 million acres to tenant farmers, as well as establishing the Federative Farmers Bank of the RVN. By the time the land reforms had reached their climax in 1980, the Viet Cong, a long known nuisance, had effectively been erased.

Yet things were starting to go awry. Diem, the two-decade ruler of Vietnam, began to suffer from dementia, and gave out increasingly erratic orders, such as, among other things, the promotion of a (now defunct) personality cult, and the eradication of bees from the country. Desperate for immortality, he sent several squads into the depths of the country to find the mythical elixir of life. Suffice to say, this failed, and those same squads were executed. By April 1983, Diem was hospitalized after a stroke, and on August 5th, 1983, Ngo Dinh Diem, President of the Republic of Vietnam, died.

Although the death of the long-reigning Diem in 1982 sparked a brief succession crisis, the hitherto unknown Ngo Dinh Quy, one of Diem’s nephews, stood up and seized power. He was able to, conveniently as one might add, purge any opposition in the family, and schedule new elections. This was to prevent a breakdown of the veneer, that is, the veneer of a functional government. On September 12, 1983 Ngo Dinh Quy was inaugurated as President of the Republic of Vietnam.


Complications in the Republic of Vietnam

While the regime has liberalized over the years since the end of the Vietnam War and the beginning of the reconciliation process between the DRV and RVN, it has always had major flaws. Said flaws were compounded by Diem’s increasing senility and Quy’s recent inauguration. Among these issues are as follows:

A growing narcotics trade:
The Burmese Ne Win regime has been expanding its capability to export opium and other narcotics to other Southeast Asian countries. One of them is the Republic of Vietnam, whose South China Sea coastline makes it a valuable hub for narcotics traffickers. This has resulted in an inflow of drugs through the major cities of the Republic.
In particular, Hue, Saigon, Can Tho and Da Nang have all been flooded with high-quality opium, which has created an epidemic not seen elsewhere other than Colombia. Worryingly, the government of the Republic of Vietnam seems to have cashed in on the opium craze, with the regime’s lower ranks becoming indistinguishable from the traffickers they’re trying to apprehend.

Gang warfare:
Gang warfare, something thought to have been stomped out in the 1950s, has unexpectedly reappeared. Minor gangs taking advantage of the booming drug trade have morphed into cartels, exerting undue influence on the local government. When Diem was in power, he was reluctant to take action against them-an action detrimental for his nephew, for the situation could rapidly escalate into a full-blown drug war. And a drug war could allow for a return of communism, something we cannot tolerate at all costs.

Corruption:
Corruption is a prominent element of the RVN government. All across the eastern and southern provinces, there has been an explosion in the number of bribes, kickbacks and laundering schemes. Originating under the Diem-era practice of nepotism, the appointees would appoint members of their own families, creating a cycle of neverending nepotism and a dysfunctional government run by incompetent Ngo appointees, one that only holds up due to the fear of Communism.

Abuse of the Justice System:
As the narcotics trade and gang warfare intensified in the Mekong region, the Diem regime empowered the judicial branch in order to, and I quote, `combat the increasing narcotics trade, gang-related malignancies that have threatened the Republic, and to ensure that the countryside and urban areas do not conflict with one another.` In practice, the Diem regime has repeatedly abused its own justice system and committed many extrajudicial atrocities in order to cement its rule, such as the leniency of punishments on Catholics, and the severity of them on Buddhists. This had lead to the formation of movements hostile to the regime.

Catholic Favoritism:
An all to common staple of the Diem regime, Catholic favoritism was a normalized feature of French rule in Indochina transferred to the Republic. With Ngo Dinh Diem and the late Nhu being ardent Catholics, favoritism of their religion was bound to occur within the South. In the first few years of Diem’s rule, Catholics were favored in the government, with civil service positions being given to Catholics over Buddhists, even if the former was less qualified than the latter. The military was the practice’s next victim; incompetent Catholic officers were promoted over their competent Buddhist counterparts, simply because they were Catholic. This would harm the South’s ability to neutralize and eliminate the Viet Cong, and ultimately require us to intervene in ‘71. This culture of Catholic favoritism was extended into the private sector, with economic positions being awarded to Catholics, causing widespread economic inefficiency. This has resulted in a rather dysfunctional state of affairs, one propped up by fear and, reluctantly, American weapons.

Rise of the 3 D’s:
Now, as we have discussed, the Diem regime was a regime that ostensibly favored Catholics, and as such discriminated against Buddhists. After Nhu’s death (discussed above), Diem relaxed his anti-Buddhist stances. Yet as the decades went by, an ever-senile Diem relapsed into favoring Catholics once again. However, he was now more unforgiving to the Buddhist population, which, despite conversions, was estimated to be around 70% of the population. This sparked the revival of Buddhist grievances against the Diem regime. Violent Buddhist radicals mounted opposition to the Diem regime in the form of the 3 D movement- “Death to America. Death to Catholicism. Death to Diem,”, a clear showing of their desires. These radicals now threaten the security of the Republic akin to the cartels, and so must be cauterized fast, or else.

Torture:
Torture is common both Vietnams, however a certain aura of sadism emanates from the RVN when it comes to it. The Southern Provinces houses a wide complex of prisons and detention centers for those found to be malignant to the Diem regime. Of those prisons, Con Son is by far, one of the most unforgiving. Reports from several US advisors show that the prisoners were found to be in ‘tiger cages’. Later reports show them to have been beaten, tortured, and sometimes murdered for the slightest signs of disobedience. This indicates that the RVNP lacks restraint, or even basic morals when it comes to detaining prisoners, even if they are of the red variety.

Concentration of Wealth:
With the republic experiencing stable economic growth since the end of the Vietnam War in 1967, there has been a continuing concentration of wealth into the hands of the higher strata of society. More importantly, the urban elites have taken to abusing these newfound riches in ways that most decent Americans would see as degenerate.
We won’t go into what they do with said riches, but one thing is for certain; it has created an alienation of the poorer urbanites with the elite. The government has been hesitant on doing anything involving the urban landscape given this, even when they are in need of financial assistance. This has lead to a continuing degradation of the trust urbanites have on the government.

Rural Favoritism:
Oddly enough, the government has been successful in building up a base of loyal farmers and country-folk in order to do the following:
  • Prevent any form of communism from resurging within the rural populace
  • Establish a strong base of loyal South Vietnamese citizens in case the urban scene decays even more.
  • Break up the monopolies held by former landowners in order to keep the populace happy
Ever since the land reforms of the 60’s and 70’s, which broke up the large estates into smaller, more individual plots of land, as well as providing compensation to the landlords. This was, of course, prevent any form of malcontent within said class. Incidentally, the People’s Land program was not without one major caveat.

Enter the Farmers Union. Previously a concept in the cabinets of Diem, now a fully realized dream after the inauguration of Quy in order to keep the rural populations complacent. Another prerogative was to keep any notion of moving up in the social ladder repressed by subsidizing their lifestyle. Any farmer/peasant who was not a member of this Union would incur the wrath of the state via fines, restrictions on travel, and ultimately, confiscation of land.


Outlook

The Republic of Vietnam’s survival seems grim. The issues faced by the Republic in the 60’s and 70’s were only exacerbated into the 1980s. With Diem being more hands off (unless it pertained to the communist menace), these issues only got worse as time went on. So when Quy inherited his uncle’s mantle as President of the Republic, he was left with a country that was on the path to an eventual Viet Cong revival and a possible popular revolution, Quy must act fast in order to keep his country from devolving into total anarchy. As of 1985, the situation looks bleaker than it ever was.


oOuBWWc.jpg


I would like to thank my good friend @FesteringSpore for helping me out with the writeup.​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
USAmerica-edit.png

States and Confederations + Districts.png

Can anyone help me with House of Representatives numbers for the States and the Republics? Maybe of Districts too though I suppose it is probable that they might have no representation. They do have a Senator each while States and Republics have two senators each. Anyway the populations should be OTL or close enough anyway, the House should have OTL number of Representatives. I would like to learn how many representatives each state and republic has. Maine is part of Massachusetts.
 
Last edited:
@Clandango the weirdness in India and Australia is because there were inset maps over them in the basemap. most of the weird shit going on, like american Shanghai and large Burma is bc of bugged events in Vic2 or wonky AI. i had the option to keep Ryukyu in the 1950s, but opted not to to preserve my relations with Japan. the american Shanghai is because I took the decision to create international settlements in Qingdao, Weihaiwei and Shanghai during the civil war, and for whatever reason they never dissolved after the war and stayed as my puppet. the Shanghai one in particular i accidentally used an exploit in the self-determination decisions to annex it, and since for some reason it didn't affect my relation score with KMT i just kept it.
 
Not so much territorial expansion as a mild swelling. France usually gets shafted in alt-WWIIs where it plays the bad guy. :biggrin:
That's understandable though, right? France is pretty empty compared to the very densely-populated Germany, meaning the baguette army's gonna have some serious trouble invading their rival.
 
Not so much territorial expansion as a mild swelling. France usually gets shafted in alt-WWIIs where it plays the bad guy. :biggrin:

That's understandable though, right? France is pretty empty compared to the very densely-populated Germany, meaning the baguette army's gonna have some serious trouble invading their rival.

In a TL/Map series I made for fun starting 1914 had a French axis and as far as I remember they had annexed Catalonia had Spain as a puppet and had reached atleast the Elbe in the east. Will probably check tomorrow to make sure. Anyway maybe not as impressive as what the Nazis managed to do but still better than failing to cross the Rhine.
 
That's understandable though, right? France is pretty empty compared to the very densely-populated Germany, meaning the baguette army's gonna have some serious trouble invading their rival.


"Baguette" army? Oh, do we have a lover of Freedom Fries here? :p

But yes, Germany OTL by the 1930s era was in a good place for military expansion, with relatively small and weak states all around (the Low Countries, Denmark, Austria, Poland, the Czechs and their built in German problem, etc.) while a France allied with Italy either has to get through the Pyrenees to get the no-prize of Spain or only have the Low Countries to munch before running into a lot of Germans. OTOH, much depends on your initial POD, and France can get pretty far in the case of a non-unified Germany. Even in the case of relatively late PODs, timing is important (if Fascist France is facing a continued Wiemar Germany that's really only just started to rearm, the 60% population advantage isn't going to help that much).
 
the_atlantic_rock_war_by_spiritswriter123_ddbzxiv-fullview.jpg

"Who in the actual bloody hell declares war for some rock in the middle of the Atlantic? Much less forms a coalition for each to claim their own rock?"

Some silly idea where Argentina, Ireland, and Spain join forces to take some piles of rocks from the Brits: Falklands for Argentina, Rockall for Ireland, and Gibraltar for Spain.

If you want some semblance of an in-world explanation: Franco lives longer, long enough for the Junta in Argentina come to power. At the same time, the Troubles in NIreland ramp up, leading to much greater tensions between Ireland and Britain. The three decide to ally with each other to take down Britain and the name of National Pride. Notably, Ireland realizes that taking NIreland is fruitless, but could possibly wrest Rockall out of Britain's hands to claim a win (and get whatever possible oil might be around there).
 
Last edited:

Starforce

Banned
Welcome to the world of the Eternal Standoff: The Silent war.
cB5WORi.png


The Point of divergence is unknown, however it is the year 20XX, and the Silent War rages on. Set forth by the behemoths of the Russian Empire and the United States of America. Both regimes are autocratic, oligarchic in structure, much like Russia today though more right leaning. Europe is divided between Russia and American proxy states, much like the cold war, but the both regimes are far similar than they like to admit. The European states are divided into puppet states between the 2 large behemoths, lobbying for power over a dieing, abysmal world, likely ending in the war to end all wars. Though that is what they want you to think, this is all but a ploy to 'better' the world, as Russia and America are secretly allies, purging whatever stands against them by keeping up this illusion, the question is, how long will it last?
 
Something a bit different: a quick map (lines on an Openstreetmap base) of what it'd look like if someone decided to build a motorway (shown in green) along the south coast of England (along with connecting roads, shown in yellow), a mile or so out to sea in an immersed-tube tunnel (along the seabed).

Result: massively improving the road network of southern England, without much visible effect on the environment/landscape (as the impact is almost all underwater!)

It'd be very useful.

PC73rg8.png
 
the_atlantic_rock_war_by_spiritswriter123_ddbzxiv-fullview.jpg

"Who in the actual bloody hell declares war for some rock in the middle of the Atlantic? Much less forms a coalition for each to claim their own rock?"

Some silly idea where Argentina, Ireland, and Spain join forces to take some piles of rocks from the Brits: Falklands for Argentina, Rockall for Ireland, and Gibraltar for Spain.

If you want some semblance of an in-world explanation: Franco lives longer, long enough for the Junta in Argentina come to power. At the same time, the Troubles in NIreland ramp up, leading to much greater tensions between Ireland and Britain. The three decide to ally with each other to take down Britain and the name of National Pride. Notably, Ireland realizes that taking NIreland is fruitless, but could possibly wrest Rockall out of Britain's hands to claim a win (and get whatever possible oil might be around there).

This is so cool!

Might I riff? Maybe they could put together a plan to capture the Ascension Islands? Could see some carrier on carrier action, Eighties South Atlantic style. No real invasion of Ireland or Northern Ireland, just bits and pieces on the edge, nobody wants a war right there, and neither one wants the kind of occupation it will be. On the other hand, plenty of noisy raids that blow up military stuff, airports, and cargo facilities, with maybe some aircraft on aircraft fights. Depending on the run-up to the fight, Ireland might have some jet planes for this. Ireland might take Rockall in a surprise raid on the first day ... can anyone live there?
 
HNiaN5W.png


Reach For the Stars
(2047)
(Ignore the Date on Map)

---
This map was heavily inspired by a number of things. Overwhelmingly, it was the rich world of Prey (2017), though this scenario doesn't have any aliens in it. I was also inspired by the excellent timeline Blue Skies in Camelot by @President_Lincoln, the upcoming Fiftieth Anniversary of the Moon Landing, the various Tomorrowlands found at Disney Parks around the world, both the original E.P.C.O.T. prototype and the EPCOT Center/Epcot, Walt Disney's own futurist outlook, and my own very optimistic view of the future. This world is one that branched off from our own timeline in 1944, where Nazi Germany--which was or had been already pursuing multiple unattainable fantasies like the Amerikabomber or the Landkreuzer P. 1000 Ratte--decides to start pursuing the idea of landing a manned mission on the Moon. Now, obviously, this is all a pipe dream and doesn't get past the theoretical level, but what does happen is that formulas and theories that are required to achieve orbital flight and to leave Earth for the Moon are thought up a decade sooner. When Wernher von Braun and his team surrender to the United States in '45, the Americans are already halfway to launching an artificial satellite--they just need to build and test the rockets.

The US launched the first manmade object into Earth orbit in 1952, the Starbound I, and the Space Race was on. The Soviets launched their first satellite, the Sputnik I, the following year, around when the Starbound II was launched. For the rest of the Fifties, the Americans and Soviets flipped back and forth in setting records pertaining to space travel, as the USSR sent up the first living creature (a dog named Zvezda) in '54, the US launched the first human (Gus Grissom) in '56, the USSR launched the first woman in space and the first human to orbit the Earth (Valentina Tereshkova) later the same year, etc. In 1960, John F. Kennedy was elected to the White House, and he began a shakeup of the establishment. He pulled the US out of Vietnam, masterfully defused tensions with the Cuban Missile Crisis and warmed the Cold War, and ensured the counterculture and Civil Rights movements stayed around longer and were more successful. He also, in 1960, declared that the United States of America would reach the Moon before the end of the decade. NASA continued to throw itself headfirst into the Space Race, now the most heated part of the Cold War as military and nuclear threats waned, securing the honor of the first spacewalk for the US. In 1966, the Stars and Bars were planted on the Moon by Neil Armstrong and Alan Shepherd, as Buzz Aldrin remained in the Command Module orbiting the Moon. In 1969, the Soviets touched down on the lunar surface as well.

The Space Race continued well into the 1980s, as new things like the space shuttle are invented. The Soviets launched the first space station, the Salyut, in 1970, with the US not far behind, putting Zeus in the skies later the same year. In 1988, though, the Space Race finally ended, as the Cold War ground to a halt. The threat of total nuclear annihilation and the doctrine of M.A.D. never arise in this world, as, following the Cuban Missile Crisis, the US and USSR slowly worked towards harshly limiting nuclear weapons, out-and-out banning them in 1979. The United States and the Soviet Union announced their ambitions to work together to build an international space station, where all nations could work together to further humanity. They were quickly joined by the European Union, China, India, Japan, Korea, Australia, Canada, and the Congolese Republic, with more nations signing on as the years flew by. The International Space Station (better known as the Skylab) was put in orbit in 1992, the thirtieth anniversary of the Moon Landing.

The years flew by. Life on Earth became something akin to the vision of the future of the 1950s/1960s, thanks to Disney successfully opening E.P.C.O.T. and it being a resounding success. Today, space travel is still largely controlled by world governments, though there have been many steps forward to commercialization. The Skylab is joined by its partner, the Lifeboat, which could be used as an ark for which humanity to escape an apocalyptic scenario with, though it functions on the day-to-day as a research station like Skylab. Alongside the international space stations are those owned by singular governments (like the American Thor or the Chinese Fei Lian), corporations (like the Disney Moonliner or the Microsoft-Apple Worldview or the Wilcox Daedalus), and even one that's privately owned by one of the world's few trillionaires. There are colonies on the Moon, bases on Mars, explorations to Ganymeade, probes past Pluto, and many, many asteroids that have been landed upon and mined. Humanity is reaching for the stars, and they're not done yet.

  • United States of America
  • Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
  • European Union
  • People's Republic of China
  • India
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Australia
  • Canada
  • African Union
  • United Arab Republic
  • Brazil
  • Israel
  • Argentina
  • Mexico
  • Indonesia
  • New Zealand
  • Thailand
  • Peru
  • Malaysia
  • Pakistan
  • Warsaw Economic Union
  • United Arab Emirates
  • The Philippines
  • Vietnam
  • Bangladesh
 
Last edited:
Possibly. I suspect engineering wise it would be both staggeringly expensive and not actually work as well as a land-based one.

Also I don't want to think of potential traffic jams under that length of water.

I think the biggest issue would be the access points, honestly.
 
In a TL/Map series I made for fun starting 1914 had a French axis and as far as I remember they had annexed Catalonia had Spain as a puppet and had reached atleast the Elbe in the east. Will probably check tomorrow to make sure. Anyway maybe not as impressive as what the Nazis managed to do but still better than failing to cross the Rhine.

In fact here are the different European "Axis" powers at their zenith in Europe (French at their largest in Africa (late 1939) was at a different time from when they were at their largest in Europe (early 1942). Other "Axis" members were Brasil (joined late 1941, were the last to be defeated), Japanese (changed sides mid 1940, negotiated a peace in 1943, gained land even if fighting in Siberia was pointless in the end), British Loyalists (joined late 1940 after losing the rest of the Raj to the Indian Republic, only fought in Dutch East Indies,signed peace at the same time with Japan, gained land), USA (only considered such since Union of Britannic Syndicalist Commonwealths (and other communists) invaded France, Spain and Brasil retroactively making the US war against communism starting 1941 a part of WW2) and Mexico (same reason as the US) (Japan took part in the war against USA and Mexico too, therefore making themselves probably the only nation to be on one side of a war, change sides (after getting Indochina, invading Russia and Indonesia) and then change sides again (after gaining North Sakhalin, parts of Indonesia and keep fighting against the US.)

height of France (Europe) (early 1942).png

Showing French borders in accordance with the claims of the French State, also showing the Spanish ally of France and the Yugoslav puppet aiming the restore their already defeated Yugoslav ally. Other areas under French occupation shown as one piece.
height of Yugoslavia (mid 1939).png

France's original Yugoslav ally at its zenith mid 1939. This nation would be under complete Russian and German occupation by 1940 and broken apart by peace treaty in 1941. French armies would occupy parts of it later in the war and attempted to restore them.
height of Romania (early 1939).png

Romania was at its zenith at the very opening of the war (early 1939) with Romanian troops invading and occupying parts of Russia. They were pushed back almost immediately and before the year ended all of Romania was under Russian occupation. Russian puppet government was established at the same time as the post-Yugoslav states.
 
Fixed a typo in BulgariaView attachment 473622
Hitler was against reannexing Schleswig/South Jutland from Denmark. The area was mostly Danish anyways, it kept the fiction of the Germans being invited in going, they got to keep a light administration in Denmark with plenty of agricultural and maritime goods for the Germans, plus he figured that the place would be annexed in a single unit oneday. He also did not intend to give up the Channel Islands. Plus I don't think he would support a Kingdom of Spain. Heck, he actually considered later on supporting the Republican Spaniards, as those sent to Germany to act as laborers worked well and some Nazis decided they were (as was correct for the vast majority of Republican) not communists, but were going against the nobility and clerics who tried to dominate Spain. And I don't see how Man or the Channel Islands count as either an occupation or colony for the U.K., as they are separate ciuntries which have been in personal union with the English and Scottish for centuries. Also unsure about those Direct Rule areas you chose for Germany.
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top