Does anyone know of any base maps in the polar azimuthal equidistant projection?
I was bored so I deleted Spain and replaced it with Fodlan from Fire Emblem: Three Houses. (Probably overestimated on it's size though.)
Surprisingly fits well into Europe.
View attachment 560583
A map for a timeline where Crockett doesn't die during the Siege of the Alamo, which leads to different Texan and Territorial Borders. Resulting butterflies include a lack of a gambling industry in Las Vegas, the 48th state of Dinedeh being admitted in the 1920s, and Arizona being seen as the heart of the "Wild West".
View attachment 558847
View attachment 558823
Map of a Wallies wank (aka the Soviet Union get a worse purge, and in turn, they only get their 1936 borders (minus their allies "agreeing" to unite)
the finnish won the winter war, and they got Karelia independent, as a resultWhat's up with Kareli- err, the Karelo-Finnish Soviet Socialist Republic?
This is something I didn't know. I assumed it was always spelled that way since that's how it shows up in every Alternate History Map Trope. Thank you and @Analytical Engine for enlightening me on this matter.Why "New Afrika" with a k? I think that spelling only became a thing during the Black Panthers era
This is the canon reason for it. Standardized spelling varies from place to place in-universe.Could just be that people stopped enforcing standardised spelling after the ISOT.
View attachment 560664
"A wall mural of the former Roman Empire discovered in a hidden subsection of the Paláti Diogénēs thought to be commissioned sometime in the 1460's A.D. The mural, remarkable for its geographical accuracy, has gone down with Imperial maps (commissioned by the Skrinion tōn Barbarōn) as treasured historical depictions of the extent of the Empire of the Romans in this period."
(Just a throwaway map I had that I threw a couple photoshop filters on and made a little backstory )
Fascinating...
It an throwaway map, but I love to see, or learn more about it if you may.
Interesting, and a really nice map and flag to boot! Judging by the utilization of the Deseret Alphabet and the implicitly more religious traits of Columbia, is this some kind of scenario where the US becomes a Mormon theocracy?
Columbia is very religious, yes, but the Mormon Alphabet is just used as the National Secondary Alphabet to mark their difference with the British (they hate the British)Interesting, and a really nice map and flag to boot! Judging by the utilization of the Deseret Alphabet and the implicitly more religious traits of Columbia, is this some kind of scenario where the US becomes a Mormon theocracy?
I certainly hope the Andorrans manage to get some fences up quick. Quite a drop.I was bored so I deleted Spain and replaced it with Fodlan from Fire Emblem: Three Houses. (Probably overestimated on it's size though.)
Surprisingly fits well into Europe.
View attachment 560583
Exactly how much do these people know about Egpyt? I know you mention they look at them from Biblical sources, but I do not believe that or many other thighs old have mentioned Thoth. I am guessing it came from the library of someone and expanded from their. I just wonder if the Black population would have been large enough initially, as IOTL Blacks were banned from entering Illinois, excluding the slaves forcibly brought there to work. I suppose the areas they were were the ones sent over, though. Anyone got an idea of the gender balance, though? Since they had to take the slaves back to Kentucky one day a year to prevent them from becoming state citizens, I just assume it would favor males. This world accept mixed race or people of Indian blood anywhere?Go Down, Moses, Way Down in Egypt LandIn the Year of Our Lord 1858, the heavens parted and lo, Southern Illinois found itself in a new Promised Land. A land free for all... All non-slaves that is.
The Republic of Little Egypt was founded in 1860. The nickname of "Little Egypt" was coined sometime in the early 1830s and as of the present day, it is held that Little Egypt will be a mighty empire, like the biblical Egypt before it. It still has some trappings of American life. It's an American style Presidential Republic, a majority of the population follows Christianity, and it was founded with an American style constitution (Granted, that is a 1860s constitution, but still).
The same cannot be said of the Kingdom of Lower Egypt. Lower Egypt is a puppet state of Little Egypt, but they got a little bit obsessed with Ancient Egyptian culture and religion. An absolute monarchy ruled by a Pharaoh, who claimed to have received a vision from Thoth on building a new Egypt. The Kingdom of Lower Egypt has everything one would associate with Biblical Egypt: Pharaohs, Magicians, slavery, polytheism, slavery, and slavery.
In opposition to these two nations are a collection of nation-states.
The Federation of America is what remains of Pro-Slavery Illoniosians who were more patriotic in the American Dream than the Republic of Little Egypt. They still have chattel slavery, albeit on a smaller scale than Little Egypt. This makes their oppositions mostly a thing of the past and they do tend to trade more with their neighbor to the north.
What remained of some form of federal government fled to Northern Illinois and expanded outwards under the leadership of Abraham Lincoln, who was campaigning in Cario when the ISOT occured. They are in a perpetual war with Little Egypt, seeing it as a secessionist government from the United States. They say that all land that once belonged to the USA still belongs to them, and thus have seats in their legislature for every missing state in the Union, with representatives coming from Illinois, Wisconsin, and Indiana.
The Free American State is a small buffer nation founded by Abolitionists. It's less of a state and more of an autonomous military outpost for the Republic of New Afrika.
The Republic of New Afrika, occasionally called "Canaan", was organized by a former slave named Moses Jefferson. All escaped slaves know to come to Canaan/New Afrika as it is the safest place in the world. Some hope that one day, the nation of Little Egypt will suffer from a divine plague that will save those trapped in bondage.
(This complete stemmed from me thinking too hard about "Little Egypt" and everything spiraled from there. I didn't put too much research into it for the write up.)
The French decided against a cadet branch in southern Italy? Three Kingdoms (four, counting Jerusalem being attached to Sicily) is nothing to sneeze at. Savoy would lose them all soon anyways, as Piedmont doesn’t appear to really have a coastline or much manpower.Here's a map of Europe in an alternate 1715, where Jose Fernando of Bavaria didn't die et became ing of Spain. Spanish possessions are shared between France and Austria. France cedes to the House of Savoy Sardinia, Sicily and Naples in exchange for the western slope of Savoy and the county of Nice and takes moreover the free city of Orange.
Prussia continues to acquire Gelderland and the United Provinces of Venlo. There are in all 3 royal unions between 2 countries in Europe.
Unfortunately, I can never zoom in on Imgur things on my iPad. Anyways, Hitler didn’t really feel contempt for Italians and generally respected them, but got miffed near the end of the war. We should keep in mind of course that he felt the same way for Germans as time went on and was ready for them to be annihilated. Southern Libya looks quite messy hereI understand that the whole "Mittelafrika" deal has probably been done to death, but I thought I'd throw my hat into that massive ring. I tried to map out all of Africa, including national/colonial subdivisions and I also included reasonable locations for Germany's Atlantikwall, extended across the continent to ward off the USA. I understand that this entire scenario is immensely unlikely, but that won't stop me from trying my hand I suppose.
Some points about the map:
• It seems unusual to me that any Mittelafrika would extend into West Africa, which a lot of other creators seem to include as an integral part of Mittelafrika. That colony would surely be behemoth enough, and impossibly difficult to administer, without throwing West Africa in too, so I think any German interests in that region would not be subordinated to Dar Es Salaam. Though that would open up the whole idea of breaking up Mittelafrika entirely, but whatever.
• The idea of expelling the French entirely from Africa seemed altogether too unlikely, especially considering the view that France (Vichy France) was an Axis power. Naturally, any Mittelafrika must consist of Gabon, Congo, etc. but I feel the total lack of German interests in, say, Mauritania, would preclude evicting France entirely. Of course, Algeria was an integral part of France, hence why it is given a different colouration to the colonies proper.
• The treatment of Germany's allies (so-called) need not be generous, in my view. I feel I've read plenty illustrating Hitler's contempt of Italy et al. Morocco is not given over to Spain (neither is anywhere else), being that they were neutral, but they are afforded the privilege of joint administration over that country. Italy is ceded control over Sudan and much of Kenya (though Germany was never interested in settler-colonies, they happily take the areas of Kenya suitable for European habitation) in addition to remote areas of former French colonies. In much the same vein as similar colonial aspirations like Rhodes' Cape to Cairo, France's Fashoda incident or Portugal's "pink map" this permits Italy's colonies to become contiguous. In all, for the likes of Italy, I'm sure this would have been plenty reasonable.
• As for neutral nations - Spain having already been addressed with regard to Morocco - they were not participants in the war and thus their colonies are not affected. Officially, at least. Though Portugal keeps her colonies, you'll note German spheres of influence in Angola and Mozambique. I based the Mozambican one based on contemporary attitudes to its culture and administration (that north of the Zambezi Mozambique was most closely connected to Nyasaland (Malawi) - Ian Smith noted as such in his autobiography, and throughout the colonial period it was the Nyasaland Company that commercially administered the region on behalf of Portugal). As for in Angola, this is based on the zone that British colonial authorities had at one point claimed. Even where neutrals do not have such clearly defined de facto German zones of control, all host German naval bases.
• Liberia is an unacceptable experiment in negro democracy. Divided between French possessions, effectively deleting its borders as well as its sovereignty and democracy.
• South Africa is subordinated under the Reich, gaining Bechuanaland and S. Rhodesia for its trouble. Walvis Bay overlooked by the Germans upon retaking S.-W. Africa and so is annexed to Mittelafrika without protest, or indeed much notice. The usefulness of S.-W. Africa seems effectively nil, as despite the apparent land border the Caprivi strip is in fact essentially worthless for travellers and administrators alike. But, it was German pre-WWI, so cannot go without being retaken by the Germans.
Errors:
• I had intended for Madagascar to have been its own German colony (same with West Africa).
• I forgot to restore Cameroon to its German borders.
• Couldn't find anything on Egypt's administrative divisions.
Also, the image was too big. Does this link work out?
Why would they want it independent in this way? Doesn’t seem like it would be the most suitable of buffer states. Did it avoid too much ethnic cleansing by the Soviets in this timeline? Though might be that Karelia was the one place the Finnic and Scandinavian peoples were not liquidated in.the finnish won the winter war, and they got Karelia independent, as a result
Rockall doesn’t have too much of a point as being shown, as only the British would recognize it. Scotland going independent as some sort of oil empire seems ridiculous, given the British would be able to grab what they need in multiple places, and the Scandinavians would probably get some rights to Scandinavia. Bound to be maybe a hundred thousand or so in the UK. How and why did the Canary Islanders seize the Azores? Seems Madeira would be so much simpler. Ahh, right. Azores got emptied in this ISOT. Seems Portugal would have wanted to settle them quickly, though. The pirates within the Caribbean seem kind of pointless as who are they going to rob or get resupplies from? Also, how you think things went down with Brittany here? The British offered it up to the Irish or they settled it first? And of course there is the big issue. What timezone is Gibraltar in? Oh, and are people in boats in the time zones brought over as well?I had an idea for an ISOT series based on standard time zones. I thought I'd start with UTC±00:00 to test the waters.
View attachment 560773
It was on the base map.Rockall doesn’t have too much of a point as being shown, as only the British would recognize it.
Maybe my own opinions are coming through here, but the Westminster government's handling of recent crises has been pretty chaotic and I think the ISOT Event would see the same badly put together response. This, plus the prospect of an economy built on North Sea oil (one of the Scottish nationalists' key arguments) tip the balance in Scotland in favour of independence and England frankly bids them good riddance.Scotland going independent as some sort of oil empire seems ridiculous, given the British would be able to grab what they need in multiple places,
I did think after I posted that maybe I should have considered immigrant communities so I'll try and do so continuing on. The only 'Scandinavian' areas ISOT'd were Iceland, the Faeroes and a Danish weather station in Greenland, the latter two quite quickly turning to the former to provide full government services. Maybe Iceland would have looked to the east, but I thought the Greenland-North America option would been more appealing particularly as the Icelanders already had a foothold in Greenland thanks to the Danish weather station.and the Scandinavians would probably get some rights to Scandinavia. Bound to be maybe a hundred thousand or so in the UK.
Portugal was initially interested in Iberia, annoying the Canary Islanders who thought it should be theirs, so they grabbed the empty Azores to spite the Portuguese. Madeira was included in the Event so was already full of Portuguese.How and why did the Canary Islanders seize the Azores? Seems Madeira would be so much simpler. Ahh, right. Azores got emptied in this ISOT. Seems Portugal would have wanted to settle them quickly, though.
The pirates of the Caribbean is partly a pun. They target the transatlantic traffic between Canaria and her colonies in Hispaniola and Puerto Rico as well as the increasingly frequent African colonisation voyages.The pirates within the Caribbean seem kind of pointless as who are they going to rob or get resupplies from?
Again Britain's chaotic response to the Event allowed the Irish time to set up in Brittany and Gascony. Once the Brits did make it across the Channel in any organised sense they were happy to leave the Irish be.Also, how you think things went down with Brittany here? The British offered it up to the Irish or they settled it first?
Gibraltar's in UTC+01:00 so the Rock started out uninhabited.And of course there is the big issue. What timezone is Gibraltar in?
TBH, I didn't consider the nautical parts of the time zone, which I should have done. There probably should therefore be some form of France, northern Spain and the North Sea nations.Oh, and are people in boats in the time zones brought over as well?
Egyptmania in the early 19th century combined with some knowledgeable books on Egyptians deities being in the area led to a New Egyptian Revival after the ISOT.Exactly how much do these people know about Egpyt? I know you mention they look at them from Biblical sources, but I do not believe that or many other thighs old have mentioned Thoth. I am guessing it came from the library of someone and expanded from their.
I didn't think too much about this. This scenario follows some "Rule of Cool" logic, so this isn't taken too much into account.I just wonder if the Black population would have been large enough initially, as IOTL Blacks were banned from entering Illinois, excluding the slaves forcibly brought there to work. I suppose the areas they were were the ones sent over, though. Anyone got an idea of the gender balance, though? Since they had to take the slaves back to Kentucky one day a year to prevent them from becoming state citizens, I just assume it would favor males.
New Afrika and the Free American States have explicitly mentioned rights in their constitutions that protect them. The United States accepts mixed race and Native Americas more readily, but doesn't explicitly protect their rights.This world accept mixed race or people of Indian blood anywhere?
CoolI had an idea for an ISOT series based on standard time zones. I thought I'd start with UTC±00:00 to test the waters.
How religious are we talking about here? Is Columbia a theocratic state?Columbia is very religious, yes, but the Mormon Alphabet is just used as the National Secondary Alphabet to mark their difference with the British (they hate the British)