I'll be honest: I really don't like the borders. Seriously, they look really weird.
I'd agree, they don't look very natural. *China in particular bothers me...
I'll be honest: I really don't like the borders. Seriously, they look really weird.
To be fair, the Chinese borders were *meant* to be unnatural. Most of them are settlement districts so splitting up lands that are to either be razed or repopulated into rather odd shapes to keep away cooperation is what the Mongols were going for.I'd agree, they don't look very natural. *China in particular bothers me...
Well, I did promise it earlier.
BONUS: Try to guess what's going on in Ukraine (not finished yet)
Unnatural is fine, but they're just not aesthetically pleasing. And, in this thread anyway, that's pretty important.To be fair, the Chinese borders were *meant* to be unnatural. Most of them are settlement districts so splitting up lands that are to either be razed or repopulated into rather odd shapes to keep away cooperation is what the Mongols were going for.
What are "Palatine counties?" I have heard of knights Palatine of the HRE, which usually held wee little territories, but I imagine this isn't quite the same. I see you also have "Palatine zones" and "Palatine vassals", so I expect this will be complicated...![]()
They do share the same Late Roman/Carolingian origin (comes palatinus, litterally "count of the palace", an high-administrative/military rank) but while in the Empire and (albeit less so) in France it eventually named particularily powerful counts, it was more or less the equivalent of marches (or apanages) in medieval England and were significantly autonomous : exempt of a lot of obligations of other nobiliar territories in the kingdom, or having their own coinage for exemple.
Well, historically, some counties or palatine counties were "upgraded" as duchies but it was essentially cosmetic. I'm under the impression it might be somewhat similar with palatine zones and territories, but Alex_Richards may have another idea about his own mapStill a bit unclear as to why three different types, though. And how exactly do they differ from "autonomous vassals?"
Snippipines
Snip
Welp, that is beautiful. Lovely write up, though it has always amazed me how long these people can talk for.
Query; I'm pretty certain that, with the exception of Romania, most countries at least of the Warsaw Pact overthrew their communist governments peacefully. This posts seems to imply that that was an uncommon occurrence ITTL. Does that mean the breakup of this world's Communist Internationale was more violent?
And will the Moro secede? Or is that something to keep us on the edge of your seats for later?![]()
I gotta say, I think this might be my favourite designed map of the year. Or at least as far as I can remember so far.
I still think it would be plausible to subdivide Svealand. Svealand, just like Geatland, has never been an politically important subdivision of Sweden.Like I said, I'm trying to halfway base things in history. If I was just subdividing from scratch it would be rather pointless.
Oh I know. Just thought that would be funny.Umm, no. It's called that because of its association with the free churches, but it's not and has never been any sort of ecclesiastical centre for the state church. That said, agreed on dividing Småland.
but I'm pretty terrible at making islands. Anybody have any pointers?
X-posting my MotF entry, sorry for massive writeup :/
Those poor madagascans.
Umm, no. It's called that because of its association with the free churches, but it's not and has never been any sort of ecclesiastical centre for the state church. That said, agreed on dividing Småland.
Truly awe-inspiring.
A few questions:
So provinces and counties, I assume, are about the same thing, parts of the world-raj with direct representation in Parliament?
What are "Palatine counties?" I have heard of knights Palatine of the HRE, which usually held wee little territories, but I imagine this isn't quite the same. I see you also have "Palatine zones" and "Palatine vassals", so I expect this will be complicated...
What's the political difference between "autonomous vassal" and "autonomous province."
Are "directly controlled" areas held by the Crown colony-style, or do they have some form of representation?
Is a "Mediate" vassal a vassal of a vassal?
Do the colors aside from the various shades of red/pink have any significance besides allowing keeping track of states spread out between multiple locations?
Still a bit unclear as to why three different types, though. And how exactly do they differ from "autonomous vassals?"
Well, historically, some counties or palatine counties were "upgraded" as duchies but it was essentially cosmetic. I'm under the impression it might be somewhat similar with palatine zones and territories, but Alex_Richards may have another idea about his own map
I suspect that "autonomous vassals" are principalties that beneficy from an even more independent policy (at least on paper) compared to other autonomous territories, a bit like princly states.
I'm puzzled myself, tough, by the use of "Pays d'Etat" for such territories in the Crown of France tough : provincial estates implied direct royal control over a region historically, quite the contrary than what seems to be depicted on this map.