Status
Not open for further replies.
Alright, so... for the last 10 or so months, I've been working on a commission for someone in DeviantArt. I bit off more than I could chew. :coldsweat: Today, the map is finally finished, and it's one of the biggest maps I think I've ever made, and definitely one of my favorites. It pictures a world in the wake of a surviving Ottoman Empire and a near-total Central Powers victory in WWI. It also features a rebounded Russia in the form of the USSR, and the map shows its bloc in Asia, along with the Ottoman monarchy in the southwest. I'm not amazingly sure about the scenario itself, but I'll try to answer any questions about the map. Enjoy! :)


Very beautiful, though of course nit-picks must be made :D

-Crimea OTL was only transferred to Ukraine in the 50s; before that, it was briefly its own ASSR before being annexed to the Russian SSR as the Crimea oblast
-Transjordan should really be called Palestine (OTL Transjordan was the eastern half of Palestine, and was called that because it was "across the Jordan" from "Palestine proper"), and its capital should really not be in Amman. Nablus, Haifa, or Nazareth are much more likely, in roughly descending order of likelihood.
-That Lebanon is way, way too big to be called "Lebanon".
-Aleppo and Damascus in one province is okay, but I can't imagine the Damascenes are at all happy about Aleppo being the regional capital, despite Damascus being larger, richer, and the historical capital of empires.
-Have the Trucial states been annexed onto Oman? How did the Ottomans take all of those bits off the British? (Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, Trucial States [modern UAE], and Oman were all taken by the British well before WWI). It seems unlikely that the Ottomans would demand them in victory, or that the British would agree
-Having Riyadh as the capital of Nejd only makes sense if the Nejd is controlled by the Saudis, but the Saudis hated the Ottomans and it's very hard to imagine them being willing to be under Ottoman rule at all. Consider consolidating the Nejd and Ha'il, or move the capital to Hasa.
-The Straits make sense, but how and why did the Ottomans feel the need to conquer a bunch of Shiites living in the mountains (i.e. Iranian Azerbaijan)
-Others mentioned your Armenian Kurdistan
-The OTL border at the Sinai was set well before WWI, though I guess it makes sense to move it if the Sinai is "Ottoman proper" and Egypt is not

Questions:
-Speaking of, how are the Ottomans doing in Egypt, in the face of increasing Egyptian or Arab nationalism which was already starting before WWI?
-And all of the other Arabs, I guess?
-Tel Aviv means there's obviously some Zionists in Palestine; what's their general dealie?
-Is Taiwan Japanese of fascist Chinese?
-How did it come to pass that Communist China was strong enough to take Tibet from British suzerainty?
-Why the Upper Manchu SSR?

Sorry for the nitpicks, all in all a beautiful map!
 
T
Listen, I respect you a lot, I've been on the board a long time, and I tried not to make it personal. The Confederacy was a fucking abomination, and accusing people of supporting it is a serious accusation. And I see your side, I totally do--and secondmoon has apologized about this--but to accuse someone of Confederate apologism is not okay unless you have serious evidence.

I'd didn't say it _was_ Confederate apologism, I said it _sounded_ like it, and the relationship with Britain and Britain's similarities to the Union are irrelevant - as an English-speaking slave state located in the OTL South specifically revolting to preserve slavery Georgia works fine as an analogy to Confederacy, and it for no discernible reason abolishing slavery only a decade after fighting a bloody war to preserve it is just the sort of thing Confederate apologists go on about - slavery would have ended soon anyway, it was a dying system, etc. Basically, there is the implication that slavery was something sort of not very important, which would have gone away on its own if the Yankees/Brits/Socialist Ottomans/whatever hadn't insisted on meddling.

I agree that I could have put what I said rather more delicately. (Although I have to wonder if suggesting someone is a Confederate apologist is really as bad as, say, accusing someone of holocaust denial, or the same thing as accusing someone of racism. Robertp6165 was a respected member of the board for a number of years before his 2012 death, in spite of writing some "happy shiny Confederacy" scenarios and having the signature of "confederate troll" and, I think, actually "confederate apologist" for a while, although it may be my memory playing tricks on me).
 
Here is my insane Ameriwank with proposed Electoral votes for each state. I still haven't figured how the South American colonies will factor into this electorate scenario.

Alaska: 3

Arizona: 4 Hawaii: 4 Mexico: 10 Oregon: 4

Baja Arizona: 4 Hispaniola: 14 Michigan: 18 Oaxaca: 6 Virginia: 13

California: 67 Honduras: 7 Minnesota: 10 Panama: 4 WV: 5

Chihuahua: 8 Idaho: 9 Mississippi: 12 Panama C: 3 Wisconsin:11

Missouri: 10

Colorado: 5 Illinois: 22 Mobile: 10 Penn: 23 Wyoming: 8

Puerto Rico: 7

Columbia: 26 Indiana: 12 Montana: 7 RI: 4 Yucatan: 15

Costa Rica: 5 Iowa: 7 Nevada: 4 RG: 14 Yukon: 3

Connecticut: 8 Jackson: 18 NH: 4 Sequoyah: 3 **DC**: 1

Cuba: 17 Jalisco: 10 NJ: 15 Sonora: 9

Dakota: 7 Kansas: 5 NM: 20 SC: 8

Delaware: 3 Kentucky: 7 NY: 33 TN: 9

El Salvador: 4 Louisiana: 13 Nicaragua: 7 TX: 25

Florida: 10 Maine: 4 NC: 14 Utah: 6

Georgia: 12 Maryland: 10 Ohio: 21 Vermont: 3

Guatemala: 12 Massachusetts: 12 Oklahoma: 4 Veracruz: 11


740 Electoral votes

370 to win

united states election with territories and subdivisions colored.png
 
No? I'm just saying that was probably one of the buildup events to WWII, which is depicted in the map as imminent.

I was just wondering why the Germans and their allies don't pile on - the map specifically says it's an Ottoman-Soviet-Fascist China battle, with no mention of the Central Powers. I would think they'd be mad after being forced out of the Ukraine, etc. Or have things really gone pear-shaped at this point in Mitteleuropa?

(Funny, now I have deja vu. Did we somehow discuss this scenario a while back?)
 
Here is my insane Ameriwank with proposed Electoral votes for each state. I still haven't figured how the South American colonies will factor into this electorate scenario.

Alaska: 3

Arizona: 4 Hawaii: 4 Mexico: 10 Oregon: 4

Baja Arizona: 4 Hispaniola: 14 Michigan: 18 Oaxaca: 6 Virginia: 13

California: 67 Honduras: 7 Minnesota: 10 Panama: 4 WV: 5

Chihuahua: 8 Idaho: 9 Mississippi: 12 Panama C: 3 Wisconsin:11

Missouri: 10

Colorado: 5 Illinois: 22 Mobile: 10 Penn: 23 Wyoming: 8

Puerto Rico: 7

Columbia: 26 Indiana: 12 Montana: 7 RI: 4 Yucatan: 15

Costa Rica: 5 Iowa: 7 Nevada: 4 RG: 14 Yukon: 3

Connecticut: 8 Jackson: 18 NH: 4 Sequoyah: 3 **DC**: 1

Cuba: 17 Jalisco: 10 NJ: 15 Sonora: 9

Dakota: 7 Kansas: 5 NM: 20 SC: 8

Delaware: 3 Kentucky: 7 NY: 33 TN: 9

El Salvador: 4 Louisiana: 13 Nicaragua: 7 TX: 25

Florida: 10 Maine: 4 NC: 14 Utah: 6

Georgia: 12 Maryland: 10 Ohio: 21 Vermont: 3

Guatemala: 12 Massachusetts: 12 Oklahoma: 4 Veracruz: 11


740 Electoral votes

370 to win

View attachment 297301
It's like Decades of Darkness, only that the US is blue rather than brown.
 
This is almost certainly not true. In any scenario, it's rather pointless to make this claim and even reductive, as the Confederacy was definitely not seceding to pursue abolition on their own terms and time. Their purpose was to cement the institution of slavery and moves to dismantle the inequality caused by slavery even after the Civil War OTL were still met with violence and terror.

What I said is what I learned from my APUSH history teacher in class. Who is such a staunch liberal she took off two days of morning after trump was elected. (Background info not arguing for or against her decisions)

Yeah, not to mention abolitionism was considered so unpalatable in the South that Congress banned the Post Office from distributing abolitionist tracts there.

This is before that era. By the time of the civil war abolitionism was cemented in the era.

Can I have some confirmation of this claim? There certainly were individual southern leaders who were anti-slavery, but I am unaware of any organized abolition efforts on a grass roots level, so to speak. As far as I know, the first official abolition society was founded in Philadelphia by Quakers (sure, there was the Georgia thing, but that was due to the anti-slavery efforts of its founder, not a local popular abolitionist movement)

Perhaps my wording of restricted to the south was bad. Certainly it was most prominant in the south. Before the invention of the cotton gin slavery was starting to die off due to inefficiency, and so anti-slavery was more prevelant. (Compared to the north where the lack of slaves and poor communication methods of the time meant people barely knew about actual slave practices). Of course with the cotton gin and the establishment of "King Cotton" southern abolitionism died out. I'd link you to some sources but my history textbook is where I'm getting my information from (see my response to Bleh). If you want I can probably link you an online copy. It's just a standard AP US history textbook.
 
Alright, so... for the last 10 or so months, I've been working on a commission for someone in DeviantArt. I bit off more than I could chew. :coldsweat: Today, the map is finally finished, and it's one of the biggest maps I think I've ever made, and definitely one of my favorites. It pictures a world in the wake of a surviving Ottoman Empire and a near-total Central Powers victory in WWI. It also features a rebounded Russia in the form of the USSR, and the map shows its bloc in Asia, along with the Ottoman monarchy in the southwest. I'm not amazingly sure about the scenario itself, but I'll try to answer any questions about the map. Enjoy! :)

4WjR61b.jpg

Wonderful work. I remember you showing me various sketches of this when we first started talking, it turned out great. Too bad about how long it took though.
 
What I said is what I learned from my APUSH history teacher in class. Who is such a staunch liberal she took off two days of morning after trump was elected. (Background info not arguing for or against her decisions)

Liberalism does not equal expertise in a particular historical era. And the idea that slavery was "naturally doomed" is present among liberals, too, especially, I suspect, among those with a rosy view of human nature and progress... :)


This is before that era. By the time of the civil war abolitionism was cemented in the era.

The Georgian revolt in the TL takes place in 1837, not the 1780s. The cotton gin OTL was invented in 1793, and by 1822 half of New York's exports were cotton-related. Of course, perhaps the cotton gin was invented later in this TL?


Perhaps my wording of restricted to the south was bad. Certainly it was most prominant in the south. Before the invention of the cotton gin slavery was starting to die off due to inefficiency, and so anti-slavery was more prevelant. (Compared to the north where the lack of slaves and poor communication methods of the time meant people barely knew about actual slave practices). Of course with the cotton gin and the establishment of "King Cotton" southern abolitionism died out. I'd link you to some sources but my history textbook is where I'm getting my information from (see my response to Bleh). If you want I can probably link you an online copy. It's just a standard AP US history textbook.

I would be interested in seeing any bits of it which speak about anti-slavery being more prominent in the South! (Not to mention any indications slavery was in serious trouble by the 1790s.)
 
Crossposting from Oneshot Scenarios 2.

After trying to make a "all modern conspiracy theories are true with a healthy dose of FH cliches" world and giving up because there's too damn many, I decided to roll it back a step and only do American conspiracy theories or bad futurism from the immediate post-ACW era.
Okay, here's what I've got so far.

POD is pretty indeterminate due to all those batshit conspiracy theories being true, but the "soft POD" is Booth's bullet only grazing Lincoln's brain. Lincoln survives, but is much more sociopathic towards his enemies. Reconstruction becomes a harsh occupation with favoritism shown towards black people. Lincoln thinks Marx's theories will help end racism once and for all, invites Marx to America to become "Director of the Economic Revolution", in charge of reforming economy along collectivist guidelines. Marx, grateful for the opportunity, modified his theories so that nations and religions are okay as long as they fully embrace economic Communist principles.

In response to the harsh occupation, the CSA is reformed in the deep south. The black belt, now highly autonomous Union protectorates, are the northern frontier. CSA may begin picking off Caribbean islands, 'cause Golden Circle/Confederate Cuba cliche.

In the west, the native americans centralize and begin raising hell against American settlers.

Lincoln's America begins funding Marxist revolutionaries in Europe. After some gains are made, most of the rest of the mainland unifies under Catholic Hapsburg alliance system. Protestant Europe hates them both.

Sensing weakness, Hapsburgs invade America with help of Mexico who want their territory back. Stuck just past mexican border and southern florida.

When Marxist revolutionaries push into Russia, Russia counters by invading Alaska.

At this point, California and the west coast have been cut off by Indian nation. Some historical business magnate will see an opportunity and unify big business interests and secret societies into the Enlightened States, which are also atheistic. Seeing no other possible allies, they ally with China (gotta get that yellow peril in somehow) and begin aiding China's efforts to free itself of foreign influence.

Now being attacked on all fronts, Lincoln and Indians seek rapprochement. Indian nation will become sui generis part of USA. Lincoln also promises to give Indians land in Canada and Mexico. When Amerindian armies invade Canada, Protestant Europe forced to fight two front war with Americans and Hapsburgs.

The Grand List of Old Conspiracies:
1. Lincoln turning into an evil dictator, possibly co-ruling with Marx (this is what Lost Causers actually believe)
2. The south rising again
3. Most of the American Indians banding together to kick out whitey
4. An evil Papist Spaniard invasion to take over the US
5. An evil atheist Academic big business conspiracy to take over the US
6. Yellow peril (aligned with said evil atheist academic big businesses)
7. Nations America has gained land from (Mexico, Russia, Britain, etc.) coming back.

Conspiracies of Yesteryear final.png
 
Alright, so... for the last 10 or so months, I've been working on a commission for someone in DeviantArt. I bit off more than I could chew. :coldsweat: Today, the map is finally finished, and it's one of the biggest maps I think I've ever made, and definitely one of my favorites. It pictures a world in the wake of a surviving Ottoman Empire and a near-total Central Powers victory in WWI. It also features a rebounded Russia in the form of the USSR, and the map shows its bloc in Asia, along with the Ottoman monarchy in the southwest. I'm not amazingly sure about the scenario itself, but I'll try to answer any questions about the map. Enjoy! :)


Incredible job! I really like the map projection you used. In addition to being aesthetically gorgeous, it's a view of Asia I don't really see, since the focus is on the central steppes rather than the coasts, and it's a nice change. I really appreciate the ten months of effort you put into this, and I hope your client does too. One question, and I apologize if it's already been answered. What was the British role, if any, in World War I?
 
WnNmX.png

This map shows what the EC would look like based off the results of the primaries. The party who got the most votes total in the primary, regardless of candidates voted, won the state. The three gray states held different types of contests for each party, so the results could not accurately be compared. There are a few shockers in this, primarily LA and WV going to the Dems.
 
I'd didn't say it _was_ Confederate apologism, I said it _sounded_ like it, and the relationship with Britain and Britain's similarities to the Union are irrelevant - as an English-speaking slave state located in the OTL South specifically revolting to preserve slavery Georgia works fine as an analogy to Confederacy, and it for no discernible reason abolishing slavery only a decade after fighting a bloody war to preserve it is just the sort of thing Confederate apologists go on about - slavery would have ended soon anyway, it was a dying system, etc. Basically, there is the implication that slavery was something sort of not very important, which would have gone away on its own if the Yankees/Brits/Socialist Ottomans/whatever hadn't insisted on meddling.

I agree that I could have put what I said rather more delicately. (Although I have to wonder if suggesting someone is a Confederate apologist is really as bad as, say, accusing someone of holocaust denial, or the same thing as accusing someone of racism. Robertp6165 was a respected member of the board for a number of years before his 2012 death, in spite of writing some "happy shiny Confederacy" scenarios and having the signature of "confederate troll" and, I think, actually "confederate apologist" for a while, although it may be my memory playing tricks on me).
Slavery ended in Georgia because it had become economically nonviable what with being surrounded by hostiles and embargoed, was my justification I guess? This has become something really big and demanding fleshed-outness for starting as just a doodle...
 
Last edited:
What I said is what I learned from my APUSH history teacher in class. Who is such a staunch liberal she took off two days of morning after trump was elected. (Background info not arguing for or against her decisions)
To mirror what Bruce said, her being a liberal has nothing to do with this; it's simply bad history. After the most cursory searching, I was able to find that the first legal action taken against slavery actually occurred in Pennsylvania with the passage of this act (no surprise that it was Pennsylvania; lots of Quakers). But again, it doesn't really matter because even if abolitionism were relegated to the south, it has nothing to do with Bruce's point. It's ASB to assume that any nation that won its independence fighting to maintain the institution of slavery would then abandon that institution just 10 years later, particularly if that nation developed along similar lines to OTL's American South. As such, it's entirely understandable that his "Confederate apologism" radar went off, even if it was something of a jump.
 
To mirror what Bruce said, her being a liberal has nothing to do with this; it's simply bad history. After the most cursory searching, I was able to find that the first legal action taken against slavery actually occurred in Pennsylvania with the passage of this act (no surprise that it was Pennsylvania; lots of Quakers). But again, it doesn't really matter because even if abolitionism were relegated to the south, it has nothing to do with Bruce's point. It's ASB to assume that any nation that won its independence fighting to maintain the institution of slavery would then abandon that institution just 10 years later, particularly if that nation developed along similar lines to OTL's American South. As such, it's entirely understandable that his "Confederate apologism" radar went off, even if it was something of a jump.

@B_Munro

I think the point is mute by now, I brought up her liberalism incase of someone claiming she was simply a 'conservative' who was promoting false teachings. Whatever the case, the offical history textbook does state that abolitionism was more prominant in the South. We have already cleared up that the poster had no intentions of confederate apologism.

The book, by the way is "The American Pageant" by David M. Kennedey and Lizabeth Cohen. Sixteenth Edition, and AP edition.

Slavery has often been used as a rallying point. During the short period of the Confederacy, even some prominant abolitionists were drawn back to unite behind what they believed was their home. Now I'm not saying slavery is good, or the war wasn't about slavery, but rather that its been so ingrained into some identities that some believed it would trigger a staircase effect. A.k.a. if they take slavery away then they'll take other things that are close to us away.

I should mention, I am not intending to start an argument, though it may be taken as that. Thus I will end on a fun fact; that there are two individuals still recieving pensions from the Civil War today. Children of veterans naturally, and in their 90's but still an oddity.
 

Jcw3

Banned
upload_2016-11-28_22-40-12.png


This is a sequel to my previous map, in which Germany in 1940 was replaced with its equivalent territories from 1700. That map took place twenty years later, and this one takes place thirty-seven years later, in 1977. Here’s a link to that map, so you can read its write-up first.

Americas
*The United States of America still isn’t the top power of the world, but it’s aiming to unseat the Soviet Union...any day now, says Washington.
*Canada is increasingly torn between their American neighbors and the Anglo-French, as the two blocs grow further and farther apart, as they begin to clash more and more on the world stage.
*Peru has been pacified, after a very costly fourteen year in which a hundred thousand Americans died. The Peruvian War, started as President Kennedy’s attempt at uniting the nation behind him in a time of recession, became the conflict that united the Americas under Amero-Brazilian leadership.
*Hispanics are essentially considered on the same level as whites in contemporary American racial theory, although blacks, Jews, most Asians, Roma, and natives are still down there. The Japanese are considered a subjugated people (Defeat Means Friendship) and are thus excluded from this calculus.
*America, while still a democracy, is much more authoritarian, and there are parts of the South and some urban centers that have been under martial law for decades. Segregation still exists in quite a few states, as there’s a prevailing belief that some blacks and some whites just can’t get along.
*Panama was directly annexed into the United States after the local banana republic fell apart, and the United States intervened to prevent a communist takeover. There’s a fair bit of dissent, and it’s a hot topic in Congress over why it was even annexed.
*Guyana was another geopolitical hot point, and one that arguably caused the final separation between the United States and the Anglo-French. After declaring independence, Guyana had the misfortune to be a rival of Venezuela (a close American ally) at a time when the Anglo-French were distracted by a brutal war in North Africa. Venezuela was able to occupy most of the country, and there wasn’t a damn thing London or France could do about it.
*Both issued demands to Venezuela and Brazil to retreat from Guyana, a state that, while not officially allied with either power, was still closely related to them. They refused. This shattered relations between the blocs, and cemented this world’s status as a tripolar world.
*Argentina is grumpily neutral. Ecuador is trying to keep its food down, having perhaps bitten off a bit more of Peru than it can chew. Brazil is enjoying the fact that there are still Peruvian guerrillas, and thus more ways to bleed its new recruits.
*Puerto Rico is a state now.

Europe
*The Anglo-French have been working on solidifying their alliance into a more concrete European Union. There was a massive conflict with the Arab Union known as the Arab Wars (1962-1968) that started when Egypt and Morocco announced that they had possession of a nuclear bomb. This was a bluff, they only had the capability to develop it, although Egypt was close at the time. Their leadership had assumed this would give them leverage in negotiations with the Anglo-French and Soviets, and would let them punch above their weight, perhaps finally making those inroads into Arabia and North Africa they had been wanting.
*This backfired. After making a backroom deal with the Soviets for a free hand in the collapsing Nationalist China (it’s since gotten better), the Anglo-French used nuclear weapons for the first time in anger, as the first shots in the war against the Arabs. Eight AU military bases went up in nuclear flames in the span of thirty minutes, and Spanish troops began invading the Rif.
*The Anglo-French broke the backs of the inferior AU militaries within the first year of warfare, but it didn’t stop with the collapse of Egypt and Morocco’s militaries. No, they spent five more years embroiled in a violent, horrific conflict in the deserts of North Africa. Even today, Franco-Spanish troops stationed in Algeria still have to respond to frequent terrorist attacks.
*On the bright side, Mauretania, Tunisia, Jordan, and Libya are all fairly enthusiastic supporters of the Anglo-French bloc nowadays. Too bad it cost three hundred thousand Western Allied lives to do so. Turkey’s also on board, as is Greece, both having seen the writing on the wall in terms of Soviet expansionism, and deciding that the Americans were too far away to be able to truly help them.
*Speaking of the Soviets, they’ve subsumed Hungary into their union, and have also taken in Croatia, Bosnia, and Albania as full-fledged client states. They claim that the people of those nations chose to join them democratically, but literally no one believes that.
*The dissolution of San Marino into the Italian People’s Republic was also a thing that happened. The IPR, looking for a new boogeyman to disguise the fact that their citizens were living in poverty, decided to invade and remove the Sammarinese government, as a degenerate threat to Italian social unity. This has drawn fairly massive criticism from the international community, and even Moscow admits that it was perhaps a bit of an overreaction. It certainly killed any interest the Piedmontese, Sicilian, or Sardinian people might have had in rejoining their mother nation any time soon.
*Tensions between the Soviet bloc and the Western bloc have been increasing for some time, and they’re beginning to come to a head. Seeing that the Anglo-French are gaining more and more power, the Soviet leadership thinks it might be time to kneecap them before they begin to overwhelm them. As Soviet tanks begin to cross over into Bavaria and Saxony, they have no idea that their overconfidence and expansionistic urges will lead to the downfall of their civilization.
*This Second Great War will be regarded as even more foolish and pointless than the first one, and as the most destructive war of the twentieth century. It will prove to the world that nuclear weapons are not mere weapons, to be treated as casual tools of the battlefield, as they were in the Arab Wars.

Africa/Middle East
*I already covered what happened to the Arab Union above. Morocco is a Spanish client, Mauretania and Libya are happily independent, Algeria is under Franco-Spanish joint occupation, Tunisia’s a French client. Egypt is mostly independent and actually has a pretty similar government to what they had before the war, except with Anglo-Turkish troops occupying the north. Palestine, Syria, and Lebanon are all under Turkish occupation, while Jordan, which was neutral during the Arab War, is just clutching Turkey’s teat for the economic benefits.
*The Equatorian Union has long-since parted ways with their former French masters, morphing into a brutal apartheid state responsible for genocide in Darfur and the Congo, where their attempts at sponsoring white supremacist regimes have backfired on them. Their nation is built off of inviting Europeans to live there to help keep a significant white minority in the nation, as most were smart enough to leave when the black natives started committing hate crimes. If you’re a desperate Romanian or Italian fleeing communist tyranny, and you go to Equatoria hoping for a new start, you’re likely going to be disappointed. And murdered.
*Ethiopia’s the Soviet investment in Africa, and it’s paying dividends, with revolts in the Congo and Rhodesia leading to loyal, if unproductive movements across the continent. Addis Ababa is scaring the shit out of Somalia, especially as violence flares up over their border.

Asia
*Hindustan’s fully hitched itself to America, choosing them as the nation most likely to leave them alone, which is improving the average American’s opinion of South Asians. Hindustan herself is now clearly a first world economy, if not first world living conditions, and has full domination over almost all of its neighbors (Delhi: Fucking Bengal).
*Very Hindu supremacist, but they follow a segregationist system rather than a blatant lynch mob system, which is...debatably better?
*Nationalist China fell apart a while ago, and the American bloc and the Western bloc cooperated to support a man named You Mai, a brutal, military man, a charismatic autocrat with the right mindset for the job. The issue was that You had made quite a few enemies, and by appointing him, many of the regional governors in capitalist China decided enough was enough, and splintered off.
*This warlord period didn’t last long. You Mai, with international support, access to China’s industrial centers, and air support from the United States and Hindustan, won back most of Nationalist China’s territory within a few years. In 1972, Formosa was reannexed into the main Chinese state. You Mai is on track to being remembered as one of China’s great leaders, and is being praised by leaders across the capitalist world.
*The Soviets made off like bandits in the Chinese warlord era, too, or so they think, anyway. The Chinese People’s Republic ran off with quite a bit of formerly Nationalist land, and the Soviets even transferred Gansu (the international name for the territory formerly controlled by the Ma clique) to the CPR. This has done a good job at reducing Soviet influence in East Asia, as they’ve introduced an ally with enough power to challenge Moscow’s complete domination there.
*Korea is now under joint Sino-Soviet rule, which is another worry for Moscow in the region.
*America’s working on fully annexing Japan. It’s been a long time coming, but the country’s been under Washington’s occupation for over thirty years, two generations have grown up knowing nothing but American rule, and as such, the news that Japan will finally begin to be treated as an equal to the Americans, rather than a giant aircraft carrier and watchdog nest for both the Japanese and the Soviets, comes as surprisingly good news for the people of Japan, who, whether they like it or not, have been increasingly Americanized.
*Indonesia, a rogue state tenuously associated with Hindustan (not so much anymore) has occupied and invaded Sarawak, and threatens the same for Brunei, Timor, and New Guinea. Just in case, Washington is stationing nukes in the Philippines, in case Jakarta decides to come for Sabah.

Nuclear Powers
Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chinese People's Republic, France, Hindustan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Republic of China, Spain, Soviet Union, Turkey, United States, United Kingdom. Argentina, Greece, Mexico, Pakistan, South Africa, Sweden, and Thailand are all trying for nukes.

Members of the Western Bloc
Australia, Bavaria, Belgium, Bremen, Canada, Cyprus, Denmark, Euskara, France, Greece, Guyana, Hesse, Iraq, Ireland, Jordan, Libya, Luxembourg, Kuwait, Mauretania, Morocco, Mozambique, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Piedmont, Sardinia, Saxony, Sicily, Soqotra, Somalia, Spain, Sweden, Tanzania, Tunisia, Turkey, United Kingdom. Friendliest of the three blocs with Burma and Iran. Currently at war with the Soviet Bloc.

Members of the Soviet Bloc
Albania, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Chinese People's Republic, Croatia, Central Africa, Ethiopia, Finland, Italy, Korea, Romania, Serbia, Soviet Union. Friendliest of the three blocs with Argentina (really not saying much there). Currently at war with the Western bloc.

Members of the Indian-American Bloc
Assam, Bhutan, Bolivia, Brazil, Cambodia, Chile, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Hindustan, Laos, Malaya, Nepal, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Paraguay, Philippines, Sikkim, Tibet, United States, Uruguay, Venezuela, Vietnam. Friendliest of the three blocs with Equatoria, Indonesia, Nationalist China (but the two are experiencing colder relations as You Mai gets bolder), and Thailand



Any questions, comments, concerns?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-11-28_22-30-19.png
    upload_2016-11-28_22-30-19.png
    46 KB · Views: 209
  • upload_2016-11-28_22-37-48.png
    upload_2016-11-28_22-37-48.png
    46 KB · Views: 240
Slavery ended in Georgia because it had become economically nonviable what with being surrounded by hostiles and embargoed, was my justification I guess? This has become something really big and demanding fleshed-outness for starting as just a doodle...

Well, at this point I wish I'd kept my mouth shut - too much unnecessary drama. :coldsweat:
 
It's 1975 and the Union of American Socialists is really starting to get into this whole Internationalism thing. The UAS invaded Mexico during the Cristada War and the overthrow of the anti-clerical government, but after that nearly caused a war scare with Great Britain and France (the uncontested powers of the world after they defeated Germany in the Morocco War) the UAS held back on advancing the cause of Communism for decades. The Brazilian Civil War is a mess and what started as a proxy war between the French funded Junta and the American funded rebels has seen both sides increase the number of troops they have on the ground significantly. Even the American Caribbean (The United State of America) and fascist China have sent troops to fight against the Communists in Brazil. As conditions of the ground escalate, the world seems closer to war since the Straits of Florida Crisis in 1955 nearly brought the UK and the UAS to blows.
Commie America.png
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top