Status
Not open for further replies.
Someone on DeviantArt requested it, so here it is: a map of the Americas from my MotF entry, United States of Europe.

The basic idea behind the Americas ITTL is that there was no War of 1812, with Britain not occupied on the Continent (which is a big part of why the Confederation is having trouble getting off the ground--less of a national identity), though Napoleon still sells Louisiana to the US. With more British involvement in the Americas, the Monroe Doctrine is pretty much dead in the water, and so the hemisphere mostly devolves into a US-UK Great Game of sorts. Most of the big changes happen after the war in Europe ends, as the Spanish colonies fight wars of independence with the homeland (Unlike OTL, Napoleon didn't place a relative on the throne of Spain, just Portugal, instead opting to simply make the King powerless). During these, the UK and US sponsor different rebellions, and end up with influence in different regions. (California and Texas are Anglo-dominated republics much like OTL, except that they were sponsored both by the US and the UK and so feel more generally "Anglo" rather than British Anglo or Anglo-American, which is why they haven't joined the US. Texas probably will eventually, though.)

I'm guessing Texas and California's 'local' identities are so much stronger then?

Also, proper irony that the Spanish American lands are relatively more unified versus Anglo-America. This feels fun, an eternal '1840s World' in the Americas.
 

Zek Sora

Donor
I'm guessing Texas and California's 'local' identities are so much stronger then?

Also, proper irony that the Spanish American lands are relatively more unified versus Anglo-America. This feels fun, an eternal '1840s World' in the Americas.

Oh yeah, especially that of California. The Gold Rush brought in a lot of immigrants who felt no ties to the US or the UK (the early Californian government was basically unable to stop immigrants from entering and they needed more warm bodies, so they basically didn't try), and they've pretty much molded into more of a "Californian" identity.

Glad you like it.
 

Isaac Beach

Banned
Arranque la maleza

Roit, here's another Rehash. This time of this map, http://dain-siegfried.deviantart.com/art/On-Gilded-Shores-546892581. As you can see, I've taken it in a very different direction. The POD is that the American Revolution takes some political turns and ends up a monarchy, probably with Washington or some sort on the throne. This makes the French Revolution a rather more conservative affair, though Napoleon still becomes King -if not Emperor- and generally beats up the neighbours before taking a seat and ruling over a centralised and only slightly less feudal kingdom. This means that Spain isn't invaded, so they remain fairly stable and their Empire with them. (This has the side effect of leaving rather larger countries when they do leave in the mid-1840s, many of them as monarchies.)
Mexico, however, struck out on its own and broke off earlier than the rest of Latin America in the 1830s. They declared themselves an Empire for having claimed most of Louisiana after a brief conflict with the British and then relations between them and the United Kingdom of America (Or whatever it may be called, I hadn't really thought about it to be honest) really took off. With the UKA wanting to expand but with no capacity to do so and the Mexican government aware of all the white settlers moving across the border they eventually came to the conclusion that they would either need to see a union or conflict. The former was preferable and was brought to fruition in 1863 when the Queen of America married the Emperor of Mexico; the Empire of Gran Cordoba was the result. (I like the name) However, with the seat of power clearly moving to Mexico City and the issue of slavery being set back at least two decades due to the Empire's 'meh' policy on it, the abolitionist north-east rebelled in 1868 and with support from the British successfully broke off and was recognised in 1871 as the Republic of New England. (A name those around the Great Lakes and New York bitch about incessantly)
Meanwhile, the 'cold war' between Napoleonic France and Hapsburg Austria continued, with Austria beating up French ally Prussia and France storming through Hapsburg Italy and much of the HRE. The HEIC never really lost control of India due to a largely distracted and unconcerned London and had the longest time to try and test various administrative functions until they eventually evolved into the domineering Asian corporatocracy they are now. Russia burst at the seams from lack of political reform while technologies quietly improved into rebellion and was overtaken by alt-Green Armies led by an Alt-Aleksandr Antonov which was a pretty positive result for many of their neighbours that would have suffered OTL as the Ottomans and Persia. Japan was crushed by the Cordobans and occupied by the HEIC as a sort of country sized Hong Kong which scared the bejeebuz out of some of the smarter heads in China -specifically the commanderies- who asked via Cordoban Hokkaido to support their overthrow of the Qing regime. It worked, and they became a stalwart Cordoban ally.
Now this funny little arrangement has sorted itself out, as per the map, circa 1930.

Arranque la maleza.png
 
Last edited:
Just an alternate United States I came up with while working on a concept world, so you can see this as a small teaser for that project. Also please note that this is also heavily inspired by Basically stateside the US didn't annex Texas, the Civil War was averted, slavery only ended in the late 1890s, and at the beginning of the 20th century intense constitutional reforms resulted in what essentially amounts to centralization, the formation of the autonomous Confederacy of the South, and the creation of several "free republics", effectively territory-like entities intended to separate minorities and "treat [them] properly". OTL's Amendments XIII, XIV and XV (the Reconstruction Amendments) never happened, so discrimination based on skin color is widely commonplace ("free republics" also cannot vote in national elections) and public life nationwide tends to be segregated by race.


1) The City of Washington recently became a "city-state" as part of the centralization efforts, being granted full voting rights and getting rid of sole Congress control.

2) Virginia remains united due to the averted Civil War but there is once again a movement that wants to split the western portions of the state off of Richmond.

3) The Confederacy of the South established several "free republics" in areas where blacks were dominant in order to protect the "Southern way of life". Due to the Confederacy's ability to halt migration from these areas northwards, few African Americans live in states that did not use to have slavery in the 1860s.

4) As part of the compromise that resulted in American centralization, the Confederacy of the South was created. In exchange for keeping certain privileges, the South has to cede some as well. In the electoral college the South acts as a single entity, and they also can only send two senators to Congress as if it were a single state instead of six. However they do still send representatives to the House of Representatives like normal.

5) Furthermore the government in Washington insisted on having full control over New Orleans and the mouth of the Mississippi River, which was also spun-off as a "city-state" like the City of Washington.

6) All of the free republics outside of the South are designated for Native tribes. Effectively they are little better than reservations, and they, just like the free republics in the South, send a single delegate each to the "Free Republic Committee", which acts as an advisory body to Congress and the federal government. This even applies to Sequoyah, which has a larger population than a couple of US states.

7) The Pacific northwest was divided differently than IOTL, largely thanks to the averted acquisition of California.

8) Texas is America's closest ally and one of their key trading partners. Just like the US their public life is heavily dominated by the factor of race and the legacy of slavery still looms.

9) California is an interesting nation. Born out of a movement similar to Texas's, California was established as a slavery-free nation. Race-relations are less of a problem despite the country's diverse populace. Only native American tribes such as the Navajo, Ute and Apache, all living in the sparsely populated interior, are causing problems and generally lack voting rights.

10) Mexico, less devastated by war and lacking the American giant on their border, is slightly richer and more stable than in our timeline. Relations with California are okay, while relations with Texas are still cold. However their biggest partner is France, who in the 1860s together with the Spanish intervened in the country and established a new monarchy under a cadet branch of the prestigious House of Habsburg.

11) Canadians are rather worried about how their neighbor down south is doing. Thankfully American isolationism and British guarantees mean that Canada is safe from invasion.

Just a tiny little map I've made earlier today.
 

Attachments

  • dreadful_city_upon_a_hill___a_tyrannical_america_by_federalrepublic-daiy1pd.png
    dreadful_city_upon_a_hill___a_tyrannical_america_by_federalrepublic-daiy1pd.png
    12.3 KB · Views: 395
Arranque la maleza
With the UKA wanting to expand but with no capacity to do so and the Mexican government aware of all the white settlers moving across the border they eventually came to the conclusion that they would either need to see a union or conflict. The former was preferable and was brought to fruition in 1863 when the Queen of America married the Emperor of Mexico; the Empire of Gran Cordoba was the result.

It's an interesting concept, but the whole "Catholicism" thing strikes me as a bit of a show-stopper, not to mention that OTL post-revolutionary USians, north or south, would never accept a capital in Mexico City. Heck, dynastic unions where the unified countries turned into a single state weren't even really a thing in the 19th century...probably need an earlier POD with a Catholic Jacobite Kingdom of Virginia or something uniting with Mexico.
 
Just a tiny little map I've made earlier today.

Always interesting to see a US with different political arrangements. When you say "the Confederacy's ability to halt migration from these areas northwards", you mean "The US government's ability to halt migration", no? Since they no longer are their property, why would the Southerners care if blacks from the Free Republics go north to bug the Yankees?
 

Isaac Beach

Banned
It's an interesting concept, but the whole "Catholicism" thing strikes me as a bit of a show-stopper, not to mention that OTL post-revolutionary USians, north or south, would never accept a capital in Mexico City. Heck, dynastic unions where the unified countries turned into a single state weren't even really a thing in the 19th century...probably need an earlier POD with a Catholic Jacobite Kingdom of Virginia or something uniting with Mexico.

Yano until you said that I had completely glossed over the religion thing. Hadn't occurred to me at all, not even when writing about the Roman Estates. Damn, that's my bad and big bad it is. Well no, the capital isn't in Mexico City though I've seemed to imply that. Both capitals are still legitimate, Washington and Mexico City, but Mexico City is the more powerful one. Like how New York is disproportionately powerful compared to the rest of the US. God, I really can't believe I missed the big 'Catholics vs Protestants' thing though, that really hadn't arisen in my head and you'd think it would having working on it for a week.
 
QwMMSkR.png


Blue - the Commonwealth of Plymouth, Providence, and Rhode Island Plantations
Red - the State of Connecticut
Orange - the State of New York (Suffolk and Dukes Counties)
 
The Moroccan 1971 coup against the monarchy was successful in this timeline. The resulting republic would face hostility due to its geopolitical location, rapidly evolving towards a de facto military dictatorship under general Mohamed Medbouh and adopting a Neo-Baathist, pro-Soviet alignment. The course of events was very different in Western Sahara: the Polisario was never formed, and resistance against Spain adoped pro-Moroccan tones. Though Morocco and Mauritania jointly invaded it (putting the world on the brink of WWIII), Moroccans were recived as liberators.
How are the Algerians contributing to this? They want their own Berbers to keep quite or are they fine with seeing their regional rival be rocked around, as well as giving them someplace for their own dissatisfied Berbers to go to? And the Spanish still right wing? I can see this as the perfect thing for them. If they can just get Tangier international again, use a slice in the north for a rump Kingdom of Morrocco... Not a Reconquista, but plenty fun could be had setting up clients.
 

Goldstein

Banned
How are the Algerians contributing to this? They want their own Berbers to keep quite or are they fine with seeing their regional rival be rocked around, as well as giving them someplace for their own dissatisfied Berbers to go to? And the Spanish still right wing? I can see this as the perfect thing for them. If they can just get Tangier international again, use a slice in the north for a rump Kingdom of Morrocco... Not a Reconquista, but plenty fun could be had setting up clients.

Algeria is actively contributing to destabilize their rival to the west. As for Spain, it still had a Transition as IOTL, but it's not in their geopolitical interests to have a Baathist neighbour to the south. The Rif Republic exists mostly with Spanish aid. The Moroccan regime is trying to erase the Spanish influence in Tangier and Tetouan, and Spain is funding Regionalist groups in the area, so far with little success.
 
Always interesting to see a US with different political arrangements. When you say "the Confederacy's ability to halt migration from these areas northwards", you mean "The US government's ability to halt migration", no? Since they no longer are their property, why would the Southerners care if blacks from the Free Republics go north to bug the Yankees?

Yeah, it definitely makes more sense if the federal government regulates that matter.
 
WIP map of a world in which the analytic engine and difference engine are adopted widely in Britain, whilst the country also takes up an alt-Livingstone's crusade in the Congo. Pretty pleased with how Africa is going so far.
AWhiffOfSteam.png
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top