Status
Not open for further replies.
It's actually from my main TL, so it has a PoD in 1645. Earlier in the TL, I made some sorta arbitrary HRE borders that I'm trying to fix a little in this map. :p

Ah right. Then I think you may have to check the Ticino. Also I believe that after 1648, Switzerland stopped being a part of the HRE. Unless that's a result of your TL's development, in which case, nevermind.

I'll check it out though, I had no idea you had one
 
Ah right. Then I think you may have to check the Ticino. Also I believe that after 1648, Switzerland stopped being a part of the HRE. Unless that's a result of your TL's development, in which case, nevermind.

I'll check it out though, I had no idea you had one
I'm aware of Switzerland, it'll be explained in the newest update. :)

And please do, I love getting feedback! ^_^
 
The USA in Merely A Cold, Nothing More c. 1880. The original timeline was written by @Magus1108, and diverged from OTL in 1844 with William Henry Harrison serving a full term.
MACNM1880.png
 
Maps I made for the fix Europe thread on the Paradox OT forum:

pg0b152.jpg


The Americans got tired of Europe and just decided to invade the whole subcontinent (also taking out ISIS b/c why not)
Iraq was annexed b/c the Americans got tired of invading the place every 10 years
Iceland was annexed b/c it was a useful spot for a base
UK and Ireland annexed b/c someone needed to teach them proper right of way and English

fix North America map part of that thread:

YebtpoF.jpg


Nations:
The Great Empire State of New York
Cascadia
California
Deseret
Great Plains Union
Greater Texas
Mexico
FRCA
Gran Colombia
Cuba
Hati
Bahamas
CSA
UN mandate of Mississippi (nobody wanted them, not even Hati)
New England
Canada
Quebec
Union of Putinist Soviet Socialist Republics (UPSSR)
 
Scattering of countries on planets arranged in a Klemperer rosette
I have to say that I do find this concept fascinating considering how many stories could be told with it.
But I have some questions:
1. Does no space flight capability mean no manned space travel or no satellites as well?
2. Is manned space travel between planets common? The existence of a new United Planets seems to indicate it is, but the fact that only small amount of matter can be exchanged seems to indicate that it isn't.
3. Did the duplicate planets have the same orbital inclination as the original? This would result in different seasons on them, up to having exactly the opposite season on the antipodean to the original.
 
I have to say that I do find this concept fascinating considering how many stories could be told with it.
But I have some questions:
1. Does no space flight capability mean no manned space travel or no satellites as well?
2. Is manned space travel between planets common? The existence of a new United Planets seems to indicate it is, but the fact that only small amount of matter can be exchanged seems to indicate that it isn't.
3. Did the duplicate planets have the same orbital inclination as the original? This would result in different seasons on them, up to having exactly the opposite season on the antipodean to the original.

1. No manned space travel. The ability for manned space travel is important because having to exit Earth's gravity well twice is prohibitively expensive. Basically, two-way manned space travel requires you to travel to a planet that can send you back into space. More recent propulsion technologies are changing that, however.
2. A lot of information is passed between planets, so there are technological, cultural, and economic links between them. Also, a powerful mass driver can cause a minor extinction-level event or spread bacteriological agents, so peaceful use of space is still very important. However, the number of people who have actually traveled into or live in space, among all planets, is still in the low millions. With that said, there are people who have lived their entire lives in space, the oldest of whom are nearing 40 years old.
3. I haven't really settled the question of seasons on planets. On the one hand, I like having them all be at different stages of the year; on the other hand, I'd rather not force them into a different seasonal cycle.
 
YebtpoF.jpg


Nations:
The Great Empire State of New York
Cascadia
California
Deseret
Great Plains Union
Greater Texas
Mexico
FRCA
Gran Colombia
Cuba
Hati
Bahamas
CSA
UN mandate of Mississippi (nobody wanted them, not even Hati)
New England
Canada
Quebec
Union of Putinist Soviet Socialist Republics (UPSSR)
Vermont as a part of the Evil Empire? What heresy is this?!
 
So has Singapore fallen or is it just under siege?

Is Japan preping for a war army?

How much coordination (if any) is there between the entente and the communists?

Singapore is beseiged. It's pretty nasty.

Japan has been mobilising and fighting. Their armies are now mostly tied up in Korea or Manchuria. They don't have as many people in the army as OTL, but with aid from other Entente nations in the form of blueprints and raw materials they're quickly becoming much better equipped.

I did mention Canadian direct aid, and Canada has been sending some troops directly to Russia to assist as shock troops or trainers. The rest of the Entente is a lot more weary though. Generally the Europeans and Japanese say Canada is laxer as the Russians aren't on their doorstep, but a fairy successful socialist party in Canada with significant support from Finns, Ukrainians, and so forth certainly helps. The French are probably the second most open to cooperation with the communists, while the British accept them as temporary allies, but not more.
 
Singapore is beseiged. It's pretty nasty.

Japan has been mobilising and fighting. Their armies are now mostly tied up in Korea or Manchuria. They don't have as many people in the army as OTL, but with aid from other Entente nations in the form of blueprints and raw materials they're quickly becoming much better equipped.

I did mention Canadian direct aid, and Canada has been sending some troops directly to Russia to assist as shock troops or trainers. The rest of the Entente is a lot more weary though. Generally the Europeans and Japanese say Canada is laxer as the Russians aren't on their doorstep, but a fairy successful socialist party in Canada with significant support from Finns, Ukrainians, and so forth certainly helps. The French are probably the second most open to cooperation with the communists, while the British accept them as temporary allies, but not more.

Ok, how is ODL industry going? is it strong or weak?

Ok, so how close is the Latin Entente to the one in Europe?

Also how is Germany going for food?

Is the Netherlands on the side of the Entente now?

And who rules the seas?
 
Ok, how is ODL industry going? is it strong or weak?

Ok, so how close is the Latin Entente to the one in Europe?

Also how is Germany going for food?

Is the Netherlands on the side of the Entente now?

And who rules the seas?

ODL industry isn't exactly stellar, but it's enough.

The Latin League and Entente are not on the greatest of terms. The Latin League remains convinced the Entente cares only about European affairs and just used them in the Moroccan War. Canada still retains strong trade relations, but has critiqued the League's strong anti-US positions as too confrontational.

Germany is doing tolerably for food. Rationing is tight, but the Germans have enough food. Poles, Czechs, Roma, Belgians and the Dutch however aren't doing so good, with those in war essential industries getting barely enough to get by and those not in said industries being chronically malnurished.

The Netherlands is effectively Entente, but lacks enough of a government apparatus to properly ratify the treaty. To up their 'democratic' chops the Entente had required an elected assembly to vote a country into the Entente. It doesn't really matter at this stage though, they're effectively treated as a full member.

The Entente controls the oceans. Between Japan, the UK, France, and (increasingly) Canada they've got the vast majority of global naval power. Italy gives a good showing though, and the battle for the Med. is a nasty affair. The US has a not insignificant Navy, but is still definitely in third place globally behind the UK and Japan. German submarines are a major headache for the Entente though.
 
Probably not going to finish this.
Allies clash with Soviets in 1945 and eventually ally with the Germans
 

Attachments

  • a.png
    a.png
    131.2 KB · Views: 353
  • a2.png
    a2.png
    130.8 KB · Views: 406
  • b.png
    b.png
    130.8 KB · Views: 337
  • d.png
    d.png
    131.8 KB · Views: 392
Are OTL Maps allowed here? This is my attempt at a mapping of the languages which use Devanagari script;


bhaarat_ke_bhaashaaem_labeled_territorial_by_goliath_maps-daerfx1.jpg

Here’s a real world map. Upset and tired of some maps being insanely complicated/difficult to read, others having serious political agendas, and still more simply giving up trying to show complexities and just sticking to state borders, I’ve tried to a make a map of the languages that use the Devanagari alphabet. If anyone can give me feedback, that’d be great!

“A language is a dialect with an army and navy”, is a phrase commonly attributed to the linguist Max Weinreich. I once heard- and now I can’t find the original source of- another linguist who replied something along the lines of ‘Well, that may be true for Europe. But in South Asia a language is a dialect with its own library and alphabet.’ This is true for the areas around the rim of South Asia- Eastern, Southern, and even Western India, as well as Pre-Islamic Pakistan and Afghanistan.

However, in the central north, on the vast Gangetic plain, home to more people than the United States, a single alphabet predominates. Muslims may of course use Nastaliq, but across the teeming cities, fertile river farmlands, mountains tall, deserts wide, and jungles dense a single alphabet is widely used. ‘Devanagari’ – pronounced something like [d̪eːʋˈnaːɡri], meaning ‘of the Place of the Gods’, is one of the most great world alphabets, or in this case the greatest of the ‘alpha-syllabaries.’ With a history going back roughly a thousand years as the common system of writing amongst Hindu, Jain, and Buddhist North Indians, and as the standard for writing the revered classical language- Sanskrit (though the invention of Devanagari long postdates the end of spoken Sanskrit)- Devanagari has replaced numerous other smaller scripts.

The center of the Devanagari-using area remains North India. North India is, as formerly Roman Europe was a thousand years ago, a classic example of a Dialect continuum. A can understand B as if they spoke the same language, and be B can to C, and so on until F. But A and F are totally unable to have a conversation. Such is lack of easily discernable borders across the ‘Hindi’ Belt. Speakers of Rajasthani and Bhojpuri for instance, may both describe their language as Hindi, but are very different. A standardized Hindi, promoted by the government of India and based on the speech of Delhi but with renewed emphasis on deriving technical words from Sanskrit rather than Persian, exists almost as a separate language widely used across the Hindi Belt. Increasingly, young people, urban dwellers, and the Middle class may speak this standard Hindi natively, even in places like Mumbai and Bangalore (which are both far to the South of the Hindi Belt). The language of Delhi itself is quite closer to Punjabi or Urdu than either of those- yet Punjabi and Urdu later two are considered separate languages on account of their scripts and the religions associated with them (Sikhism and Islam respectively).

Historically, the ‘Khari Boli’ (a term roughly equivalent to the European ‘Lingua Franca’) of North India was Braj (the language of Agra) from roughly 1000 A.D. to 1500 A.D., and Avadhi (the language of Lucknow- also spelled ‘Awadhi’ or even ‘Oudhi’) from roughly 1500 A.D. to 1800 A.D. The Mughal, British, and Indian Republican governments however all promoted Dehlavi (the language of Delhi) as the Khari Boli, and in the 1800s it bore fruit as the standard versions of both Modern Hindi and Urdu (which subsequently became the common tongue for Pakistan). All totaled, speakers in the Hindi Belt likely come close to half a billion people.

The second largest language to use the Devanagari Alphabet is Marathi, the language of the state of Maharashtra, including the city of Mumbai. It too has some level of a dialect continuum between the North-East and South-West, the prestige city here is Pune, but not nearly to the extent of the much larger Hindi Belt. Marathi has had less influence from Persian, Turkic Languages, and Arabic than Hindi, but it has more than made up for it in heavy Dravidian (South Indian) influence. Still, plenty of Marathi speakers maintain that their language is closer to Sanskrit than Hindi.

Nepali, though close to some of the languages which are often considered mere ‘dialects’ of Hindi, is the national language of Nepal. Other languages of Nepal use the Devanagari script as well, even Sino-Tibetan ones like Newari, which was once the kingdom’s national language.

In Jammu and Kashmir, Kashmiri (the language of Srinagar) and Dogri (the language of Jammu) also use the Devanagari script. They may be spoken to an extent in Pakistan, but there all languages are written in the Persian variant of the Arabic alphabet, and so are not included in this map.

Konkani, the language of Goa, is unique amongst Indian languages in its large vocabulary from a European Language. Portuguese rule over Goa was much more direct and forceful than British rule over the rest of India (which required the help local elites and constant compromise), and Konkani culture has been altered by a wider margin (though two thirds of Goa remains Hindu). Even now, as other Indian languages bring in words like ‘Computer’, ‘Wash-Basin’, ‘Flat’, or ‘Highway’ from British English, Konkani brings in their equivalents from Portuguese. Though it should be pointed out that even other parts of India have taken from the Portuguese- the Hindi word for key ‘Chaabee’ comes from Portuguese.

Several other languages with very widely divergent origins- Mundari, Bheeli, Khandeshi, Bodo, to name a few, are regarded as ‘Tribal’ or ‘Adivasi’ languages. Though considered backwater, low-development village types, they often still have rich oral language heritage. Even little Khandeshi (also called Ahirani) has more speakers than Estonian and slightly-larger Bodo has more than Lithuanian.

All throughout this area English continues to spread, though unlike other parts of the words there is comparatively less of a threat of language loss due to English. In my opinion, official statistics saying that roughly a fifth of Indians can speak English are hugely over-inflated, by many Indians themselves for whom lack of knowledge of English is an embarrassment. Instead, Standard Hindi and Standard Marathi continue to grow within in India, and Nepali continues to do so within Nepal. Preservationists have already turned against Hindi, now that it is clearly the predator in the Linguistics ecosystem of India. The Indian Government debates making a Hindi a World Language at the UN (it would be the 7th language to hold that distinction), but at home Hindi still remains a ‘co-official’ language with English. Agitations both in favor of and against making Hindi a so-called ‘national language’ remain deadlocked across the country.

The Devanagari script remains in all likelihood the fourth most commonly used script in the world, remaining ahead of Cyrillic in total number of people by large margin.
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top