Map Thread VII

Status
Not open for further replies.
That seems likely, but those circumstances would not explain YUgoslavia, Greece, or Turkey per se.

But Yugoslavia is basically OTL, and Greece was having financial troubles and so the communists got elected (not necessarily in for good either). As for Turkey, do you think it would go to war over the Kurdish insurgency?
 
But Yugoslavia is basically OTL, and Greece was having financial troubles and so the communists got elected (not necessarily in for good either). As for Turkey, do you think it would go to war over the Kurdish insurgency?

OTOH, is Communist Kurdistan worth the trouble? :D

Bruce
 
The World in 1985. Officially Germany and Austria are neutral, they only just elected communist governments. With Germany neutral the USA-Europe relations deteriorated, France leading the push to resist decolonisation, and Europe has gradually shifted right over the past 40 years to near fascism (except for Spain of course). Meanwhile, a less pressured in the West USSR was able to more or less avoid the Sino-Soviet split (things are a little touchy from time to time, but after India went communist China has been more diplomatic towards the USSR). The Commonwealth is largely neutral (South Africa not being a part of it).

Long live the Great Socialist Islamic Republic of the Extremely Diverse but United Peoples of Greater Iran!
 
May as well post these.

Maps from my upcoming story Superpowered Superpowers, using the new basemap:

1940:

world_map___1941_by_analyticalengine-d3j1o8h.png


And 1970:

world_map___1970___redraft_by_analyticalengine-d3j1obr.png
 
In essence you use a tool to draw a path along the country's borders, clicking in order to place each section of the path. It sounds arduous, but if you just sit down and do it, and you're not concerned about excessive levels detail, then it *doesn't take too long.

Do you draw the whole country though, or take a pre-existing map and draw over it?
 
I'm thinking of starting a series of maps... Starting with this one. Should I continue? Also, is this map ASB in any way (The POD was in the 1400s, keep in mind.)??? (Zubiria is America, btw.) But trust me, i didn't mean to make a Hungary-wank this time, it just happened!

6.16.1887.png
 
Also, is this map ASB in any way
I'd say it's ASB in every way. Restored Roman Empire? British conquest of the Aztecs? Aragon-Galicia that conquered the Incas after either crossing both the rainforest and the Andes or going all the way around South America? Monster Persian Empire reaching all the way to Ukraine? Hungarian colonies? Ay caramba sennor.

EDIT: Prussia becoming powerful with a 1400s POD? Prussia colonizing?
 
Last edited:
I'd say it's ASB in every way. Restored Roman Empire?


Just change the color, and voila! It's some sort of Ottoman Empire. :)

British conquest of the Aztecs?


Why not? Horrible plagues are things all Europeans have in their arsenal of inadvertancy.

Aragon-Galicia that conquered the Incas after either crossing both the rainforest and the Andes or going all the way around South America?


Er, maybe they used to hold Panama and the Castilians took it from them? :eek:

Monster Persian Empire reaching all the way to Ukraine?


Perhaps it's a Timurid successor state, thus eliminating the Sunni-Shia conflict thingy? (Anyhoo, I think the problems involved in Shi'a expansion may have been overstated: didn't prevent the Shi'a Fatimids from ruling mostly Sunni Egypt for a good bit).

Hungarian colonies? Ay caramba sennor.


Now here I have no excuses, :( given the two potentially hostile chokepoints any Hungarian shipping has to get through to get to the Ocean.

EDIT: Prussia becoming powerful with a 1400s POD? Prussia colonizing?

Er, perhaps it's *Prussia?

Bruce
 
Just change the color, and voila! It's some sort of Ottoman Empire. :)

I don't think that's what was intended ;).

Why not? Horrible plagues are things all Europeans have in their arsenal of inadvertancy.

Spain or Portugal were pretty much destined to be the ones to conquer Mesoamerica. Due to ocean and wind currents, it is far easier for Spain or Portugal to reach... well, anything south of Florida, than it is for Britain or France to reach anything in the Americas at all. That's why Portugal and Spain were the first, and most proliferous, colonizers.

Er, maybe they used to hold Panama and the Castilians took it from them? :eek:

I guess that would make sense.

Perhaps it's a Timurid successor state, thus eliminating the Sunni-Shia conflict thingy? (Anyhoo, I think the problems involved in Shi'a expansion may have been overstated: didn't prevent the Shi'a Fatimids from ruling mostly Sunni Egypt for a good bit).

Ah, maybe. But the 1400s seem too late for any big power centered in Persia or Central Asia. The age of big Muslim empires, other than the Ottomans, looks like it was done by that point. I guess ImmortalImpi, that persa hijo de puta, would know more though.

Now here I have no excuses, :( given the two potentially hostile chokepoints any Hungarian shipping has to get through to get to the Ocean.

--

Er, perhaps it's *Prussia?

Butterfly effect. Prussia was extremely lucky in OTL. I don't think it'd be Prussia who united the area in an ATL.

Wait what do you mean by the *?

Bruce

Mira a las respuestas rojas.
 
I feel honoured Zuvarq, but I think Mirza knows more than me after the Samanids.

Still, unless we're talking Timurids, i can't see it holding. Even then if one of the PoDs is a surviving Timur, he wanted to attack the Ming. Naturally, attacking the Ming could be the end of him if it wasn't a disease; the man was very old.

Even then the empire could not survive so long unless blessed with an immortal Timur or someone nearly as capable as him. I see rebellions but those would have happened quite long ago, I think. As soon as Timur died the empire disinigrated. Assuming stable succession his successors would still have to deal with constant rebellions.

I think the best way to get into the Ukraine is for Timur to finish conquering Georgia then attack the Golden Horde. Actually, The golden Horde was unstable at this time. He could do it.

With that in mind I think that Timur would need to live another 20 years or so to complete conquests of this scale. This also assumes that the Turks would collapse completely after the Interregnum, something that is hard. Even if torn apart by civil war a Turkish sultanate based in the Balkans will still be stronger than the Byzantines.The Byzantines are extremely weak at this point. Anatolia is lost and by virtue the remainder of the Empire's manpower.


Persia still has a chance but an empire of this scale is hard. You can have Delhi or the Don Basin, but not one or the other. For a delhi based empire Nader Shah is your best bet as explored in a recent B_munro map/scenario.
 
Mira a las respuestas rojas.

By *Prussia I mean some other northeast-German state.

1400's the end of the era of large Islamic empires? Aside from the Ottomans, what are the Mughals? Chopped liver?

And Spain, aside being favorably positioned geographically, was also the core of the most powerful empire in Europe at the time. If they said "this is ours", who was to contradict them? A fragmented/still at war with the Muslims Spain might not be able to protect American claims from other European powers.

Bruce
 
By *Prussia I mean some other northeast-German state.

oh.

1400's the end of the era of large Islamic empires? Aside from the Ottomans, what are the Mughals? Chopped liver?

What I meant was Middle Eastern empires.

And Spain, aside being favorably positioned geographically, was also the core of the most powerful empire in Europe at the time. If they said "this is ours", who was to contradict them? A fragmented/still at war with the Muslims Spain might not be able to protect American claims from other European powers.

In 1300, Islam in Iberia had been reduced to a tiny chunk around Granada. It was the same in 1400, and up until 1492 when Spain finally annexed the area.
Even if Castilla, Aragon, Granada, and Portugal, all four of them, were independent, one of them (probably Portugal if Granada still existed) would still conquer Mesoamerica before Britain would, and probably before France would. It was very impractical for Britain and France to go conquering and colonizing in the New World before they did OTL due to the distances involved and the currents.
And Spain became powerful and rich mostly because of its colonies, not the other way around.

Bruce

Mira a las respuestas hombre.
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top