Map of the Fortnight: Main Discussion Thread

Zek Sora

Zek Sora

Donor
Dr. Nodelescu said:
Abandon The Big Ben
Make a map of the spacious and permanent relocation of a national capital. Up to this point, the country shall not have had an own historic precedent for this endeavor and the abandoned capital shall have the status of an undisputed primate city in its country.
(TL;DR: Monocentric countries with big heads as capitals that don't create a New-World-style planned city but use a grown city in another part of the country to grow organically into a new capital city.)
Click to expand...

I like this, but would prefer to make it a little broader; i.e. just "make a map of the relocation of a national capital".
 
Kaiphranos

Kaiphranos

Donor
About a day left on the extension, and we still only have one entry. @Tsar of New Zealand , @Reagent , or anyone else got entries in the works?

(I'm debating whether to try whipping one up myself if I have some time tomorrow, but I have two mutually exclusive concepts in mind. Just on the off-chance, which would people be more interested in seeing: Australia, or West Africa?)
 
Reagent

Reagent

Kaiphranos said:
About a day left on the extension, and we still only have one entry. @Tsar of New Zealand , @Reagent , or anyone else got entries in the works?

(I'm debating whether to try whipping one up myself if I have some time tomorrow, but I have two mutually exclusive concepts in mind. Just on the off-chance, which would people be more interested in seeing: Australia, or West Africa?)
Click to expand...

I'll have an entry in tonight ideally, tomorrow afternoon at the latest.
 
TapReflex

TapReflex

Kaiphranos said:
About a day left on the extension, and we still only have one entry. @Tsar of New Zealand , @Reagent , or anyone else got entries in the works?

(I'm debating whether to try whipping one up myself if I have some time tomorrow, but I have two mutually exclusive concepts in mind. Just on the off-chance, which would people be more interested in seeing: Australia, or West Africa?)
Click to expand...

West Africa always needs more AH love
 

lock

Kaiphranos said:
About a day left on the extension, and we still only have one entry. @Tsar of New Zealand , @Reagent , or anyone else got entries in the works?

(I'm debating whether to try whipping one up myself if I have some time tomorrow, but I have two mutually exclusive concepts in mind. Just on the off-chance, which would people be more interested in seeing: Australia, or West Africa?)
Click to expand...

How about splitting the difference and doing Western Australia?

.
 

Thanosaekk

Oh my god, I was just trying to post the map I had been working on for weeks and the file was too large! Am I allowed to post a link to the full map to a place like DeviantArt and a smaller size in the main post?
 
Kaiphranos

Kaiphranos

Donor
Thanosaekk said:
Oh my god, I was just trying to post the map I had been working on for weeks and the file was too large! Am I allowed to post a link to the full map to a place like DeviantArt and a smaller size in the main post?
Click to expand...

It looks like you got something figured out, but for future reference - yes, this would be fine. :)
 

Tsar of New Zealand

Kaiphranos said:
About a day left on the extension, and we still only have one entry. @Tsar of New Zealand , @Reagent , or anyone else got entries in the works?

(I'm debating whether to try whipping one up myself if I have some time tomorrow, but I have two mutually exclusive concepts in mind. Just on the off-chance, which would people be more interested in seeing: Australia, or West Africa?)
Click to expand...
I've got one in progress which I may be able to knock out tonight (NZ time), but don't hold the whole deal up for my sakes.
 
Reagent

Reagent

For MotF 192, does the rejection of a certain technology need to be organic (i.e. have widespread approval), or can it be imposed by a ruling clique upon a populace for their own aims?
 

Dr. No

Reagent said:
For MotF 192, does the rejection of a certain technology need to be organic (i.e. have widespread approval), or can it be imposed by a ruling clique upon a populace for their own aims?
Click to expand...

Kaiphranos said:
Either is fine!
Click to expand...

What about the reverse route? If e.g. a whole new city is built from scratch and there's only e.g. fibre for telecommunation purposes and a rejection of good old-fashion copper wires which may be theoretically obsolete but still in widespread use anywhere, would this qualify in this contest?
 
Kaiphranos

Kaiphranos

Donor
Dr. Nodelescu said:
What about the reverse route? If e.g. a whole new city is built from scratch and there's only e.g. fibre for telecommunation purposes and a rejection of good old-fashion copper wires which may be theoretically obsolete but still in widespread use anywhere, would this qualify in this contest?
Click to expand...

Hmm, that's sort of the opposite of what was intended, but I worded the description pretty ambiguously. In the interests of fairness, I would allow it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top
Top