Map Continuation X - Map 4 - Africa

Your claim is Mutapa/Zimbabwe, A key Part of Yemeni History is this, and Protugal Wants it. Your nation owns this region.

But the claim is legit: the Portuguese colonizers and the Mutapans allied to expell the Portuguese, for example. Time flows, so Mutapa could have been Portuguese when Yemen asked for it, but was then lost - maybe in the same period that África do Sul gained independence?
 
But the claim is legit: the Portuguese colonizers and the Mutapans allied to expell the Portuguese, for example. Time flows, so Mutapa could have been Portuguese when Yemen asked for it, but was then lost - maybe in the same period that África do Sul gained independence?

África do Sul gained its independence slowly, nobody can put down a certain independence date.
 
Um, no offense intended Turk but those borders are a tad ugly and the Mameluks seem to control about a fifth of Africa. Could you tone the Mameluks down slightly?
 
Could you by and chance take away your East African possesion, Travador? I just wrote a large history on that area.
 
África do Sul gained its independence slowly, nobody can put down a certain independence date.
Oh, right, I missed that - and, uhnm, interesting concept.

Look at Mauretania's extension
Mauretanan Colonial Africa is only a proposal - though MOST of it is desert that no one really wants, and it's at least easier to reach from Mauretana than from any other place.

EDIT:
@ImmortalImpi: of course, go ahead.
 
Here we are. I can tone down Mozambique, fix some ugly borders, but I'd prefer if it stayed like this. I can make it more straight, if you guys like.

mcx_africa.png

mcx_africa.png
 
Oh wow.

Trov, you may want to tone down your claims a bit too. I know it is mostly desert, but I think the game would benefit from a somewhat lesser claim.

Yeah, I agree it's too large. But this is, I don't know, "Antwerpen Conference" (our ATL Berlin Conference), so every proposal must be taken "with a grain of salt", as they are at best intentions than actual claims, most of time.
The original plan was that the major powers should do some broad claims like this, and then redivide the lands.
 
I still think Venice has the resources to hold a little more than small islands, but I suppose they would have thought it unprofitable to hold parts of North Africa, and in the characteristic Venetian way, would have ignored it. I will probably add some small Venetian outposts in Central West Africa since these are likely to have been the most profitable.

Venice had always been about what gave them the most profit, and managed holdings in Greece until the 7th (!) Ottoman-Venetian war in the early 1700s.

Thus, as always, Venice would have looked to expand on islands.

Expect further claims from the office of the Doge. ;)
 
Venetian holdings in West Africa. If the mainland colony is unrealistic, I do not really mind that being taken away, so long as the islands remain ;)

mcx_africa.png
 
Could we fix Northern Africa before moving on? It is a tad distracting.


Also, I think either Portugal or the UK would control that corner under Mauretania.
 
Top