I knew you would come up with that complaint. Yes, Ethiopic Kingdom is only TTL's English name. I hadn't come up with a native name at the time, but I've just decided to use it's modern native name, Ītyōṗṗyā, if that's alright.
I still see nothing. Could you attach the image to your post instead of inserting it in your post?
And what's an "interior colony"?
By interior colony I mean that Italy has a colony in the interior of Africa. And the image attachment button doesn't work (it started not working when I got vista), so that's why it doesn't work. Here, I'll just give you the image link: http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/2638/africaitqk6.png
The link doesn't work for me.
Evidently God doesn't want me to see your map.
I haven't been able to see it either. Maybe it's best that you describe it to us?![]()
Okay...that's not good. Does it even work when you copy and paste it into your address bar?
Basically, there's Libya, Eritrea, and a colony stretching west from Eritrea and south from Libya.I haven't been able to see it either. Maybe it's best that you describe it to us?![]()
I can see it.
I copied it and resaved it as a PNG.
Hopefully everyone can see it now.
The Libya and Eritrea bits are okay. That bit in the middle... no. Just... just NO.
Ok, I've reduced both the claims:
the Mughal Empire now has the Sultanate of Melinde as his rightful territory, and the Kingdom of Nairobi as his vassal.
In venetian-blue, the Padanian Company of the Congo, Padanian Zanzibar and Mare Esplendente, a colony near the Guineas.
Too big. I said a few trading posts, that is not a few trading posts.
Couldn't you mark Padanian colonies in the Padanian colour I used [yellow]?
And, just the coast of Melinde would be acceptable for Mughal? Or just single cities/trading ports properly?
Zanzibar and Mombassa, the two central tradeports in East Africa. (they were so near that I just united the border between then - if some european nation wants that coast between them, feel free to take it)Just a few cities. I'd suggest Zanzibar.