The USSR hasn't stomped over Central Asia that was their border by the end of the civil war, in fact having not taking any land from Poland or the Baltic states it seems the Soviets haven't moved since 1922 so better for the rest of the world.
Apart from that you have Angola and Algeria still having shit being blown up, I'm not sure sure Malaya would be too pleased at still being a colony when everyone else has independence, still Singapore probably more along the lines of Hong Kong than a police state OTL. Purely for the Brits, holding Kuwait might even keep the petropound instead of the petrodollar which was crucial to America's ecnomic dominance after WWII (that and Europe and Japan had been flattened). If there's no WWII like we know it, Anglo-Kuwaiti Oil would make a pretty penny as cars became widespread in a more affluent world and probably no 1970s oil crisis.
However the Dutch presense in Java, I think that might be the most unlikely, the Indonesians were ready to go to war in the 1960s over Western New Guinea for god sake, just cos it was part of the former Dutch East Indies- they'd definately go to war over Java. Holland would need international support to hold the island though seeing how many colonies remain that might not be that hard.
Also US control of Cuba, i dunno how that would go, although economically it would be better off (probably outshine Las Vegas for Casino-Tourism) but the Cubans would not take occupation and annexation by America post-1920 very well. Then again by now they might be like Puerto Rico, I bit miffed but they understand the advantages.