For those who may have missed them, the update is at post 4547 and the 1930 map of India is at 4559.
I've spent the past three montsh reading this TL from start to finish and, now that I've caught up, I just want to say that this is definitely one of my favourites TLs on AH.com. I love the focus on oridnary people, ideas, and mass movements rather than on politicians and generals.
Thanks, and I'll definitely let you know if I plan to set another scene in Halifax (which I very well might, given its connection to Sierra Leone).
It occurs to me that with all of Bengal and the more populous parts of Pakistan in the Republic proper, but much of Hindu-majority India not, the Muslims have a somewhat larger slice of the Republic's population and more of a political voice than they would have in an OTL United India...
The people in the five "princely unions" vote in Indian elections and are represented in the Indian parliament - the only difference between them and ordinary provinces is that they have "houses of lords" and the former rulers have certain local judicial powers.
Even so, though, Madras and most of the independent princely states, which
don't vote in Indian elections, are also Hindu-majority, so you're right that Muslims have more proportional voting power. This, along with Muslim prominence in the Congress and the building of intercommunal institutions during the 1880s-1910s, is one of the reasons why there was no significant movement for a separate Muslim state in TTL.
Despite its current status as a Siamese possession, I think that the eventual fate of the main portion of Burma (the Irrawaddy valley and tributaries, more or less) is going to be a mostly-independent state with Indian influence on its foreign policy a la Hyderabad and Nepal. From both a geographic and economic standpoint, it looks towards India more than Siam, especially given direct Indian control over the Irrawaddy delta.
All true, but on the other hand, it's culturally closer to Siam, and is Buddhist where India is Hindu and Muslim. Upper Burma will fight both Siamese and Indian domination, but its long-term fate (like that of the Irrawaddy delta) could go either way. It will probably be a generation or so before the matter is decided.
Buganda and the other states between Lake Not-Victoria and the Sudd are likely to have their own input, given that they control the actual source of the White Nile.
And other countries as well - the watershed goes all the way down to Burundi and the northern Zanzibari empire, so a number of states might get dragged into the conflict or play a part in its resolution. I won't go into much more detail now, because the crisis is only a few updates away.
And it really is fascinating to see these glimpses of a world where Africa, the Middle East and South/Southeast Asia have had the chance to continue developing their own cultural and societal structures without European settler colonies or resource extraction colonies overwriting them to anywhere near the degree of OTL. Just one of the things that makes me wish we lived in that world instead of the one where we had a century and a half of nightmares (and counting, in some places) instead.
There have been nightmares enough in TTL, both European-made and homegrown, and in fact, one of the consequences of a more equitable colonial world is that Africans and Asians sometimes have more latitude to oppress their own people. But hopefully it is and will be a world in which more people are able to realize their human potential.
The United States in the 1930s will be next.